Investigation of recycling repetition effect on deinkability efficiency and printing properties

References

• Laurijssen J, Marsidi M, Westenbroek A, et al. Paper and biomass for energy? Resour Conserv Recycl. 2010;54(12):1208–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanueva A, Wenzel H. Paper waste - recycling, incineration or landfilling? A review of existing life cycle assessments?”. Waste Manag. 2007;27(8):29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobu E, Iosipand A, Ciolacu F. Potentıal benefıts of recovered paper sortıng by advanced technology. Cellulose Chem Technol. 2010;44:461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drelich J, Nalaskowski J, Gosiewska A, et al. Long-range attractive forces and energy barriers in de-inking flotation: AFM studies of interactions between polyethylene and toner. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(14):1829–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mauchaufé R, Lee SJ, Han I, et al. Improved drinking of inkjet-printed paper using environmentally friendly atmospheric pressure, low temperature plasma for paper recycling. Nature.(2019) 9:14046 | https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50495-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukoje M, Rožıć M. Arıous valorı satıon routes of paper intended for recyclıng – a revıew. Cellul Chem Technol. 2018;52(7-8):515–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreasson U, Wågberg L. 2001. The science of papermaking. In: Baker CF, editor. Proc. 12th fundamental res. Symp., p. 339. Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Forsström J, Eriksson M, Wågberg L. A new technique for evaluating ink–cellulose interactions: initial studies of the influence of surface energy and surface roughness. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2005;19(9):783–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsström J, Wågberg L. Influence of different storage conditions on deinkingefficiency of waterbased flexographic ink from modelcellulose surfaces and sheets. Nordic Pulp Paper Res J. 2004;19(2):250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karademir A, Aydemir C, Tutak D, et al. Printability of papers recycled from toner and inkjet-printed papers after deinking and recycling processes. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2018;16(2):76–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çiçekler M, Tutuş A. 2019. “Atık gazete kağıtlarının geri dönüşümü üzerine bir araştırma” congress on AGRIFOR, pp. 125–135. Muğla.
   Google Scholar
• Atik C. 1999. Geri dönüşümün selüloz lifleri üzerine etkisi. Doktora Tezi, Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği, Istanbul University, Istanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Şahin HT. Geri kazanılmış sekonder liflerin yeniden kullanılması üzerine bir inceleme. Suleyman Demirel Univ J Facul Forest. 2014;15:183–188.
   Google Scholar
• Tze William T, Gardner Douglas J. Contact angle and IGC measurements for probing surface-chemical changes in the recycling of wood pulp fibers. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2001;15(2):223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahey DW, Zhu JY, Houtman CJ. On measurements of effective residual ink concentration (ERIC) of deinked papers using Kubelka-Munk theory “progress in paper recycling”. 2006;16(1):3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Mokrzycki W, Tatol M. 2009. Perceptual difference in L*a*b* color space as the base for object colour identfication. In: Conference: 1'st international conference on image processing and communications, August.
   Google Scholar
• Köse E, Şahinbaşkan T. Renk yönetiminde kullanılan standart ICC profillerinin türkiye’de oluşturulmuş bazı profiller ile karşılaştırılması. Politeknik J. 2008;11(4):s.365–371.
   Google Scholar
• Husovska V, Pekarovic J, Pekarovicova A, et al. Soybean oil-based inks for enhanced deinkability of litho prints. J Print Media Technol Res. 2015;4(4):279–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozcan A, Tutak D. The effect of zeolite on inkjet coated paper surface properties and drinking. Nordic Pulp Paper. 2020; 09-25, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2020-0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imamoglu S. Deinkability efficiency of waste office pape rPrinted using a duplicating machine. J Appl Sci. 2006;6(9):2006–2009.
   Google Scholar
• Sönmez S. Interactive effects of copolymers and Nano-Sized pigments on coated recycled paperboards in flexographic print applications. Asian J Chem. 2011;23(6):2609–2613.
   Google Scholar
• Fabio PG, Nuno HCS, Trovatti E, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;55:205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao C, Yan T, Du J, et al. Introduction of broad spectrum antibacterial properties to bacterial cellulose nanofibers via ımmobilising ε-polylysine nanocoatings. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;36:204–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayathry G, Gopalaswamy G. Production and characterization of microbial cellulosic fibre from Acetobacter xylinum. Indian J Fibre Text Res. 2014;39:93–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halib N, Iqbal MC, Amin M, et al. Physicochemical properties and characterization of nata de coco from local food ındustries as a source of cellulose. Sains Malaysiana. 2012;41(2):205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JK, Park YH, Jung JY. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii PJK isolated from rotten apple. Biotechnol Bioproc E. 2003;8(2):83–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo CW, Park JY, Kim HJ, et al. “Study on the printing quality depending on the surface roughness of the digital printing paper" palpu chongi gisul. JKTAPPI. 2016;48(4):14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Novaković D, Stančić M, Karlovits I, et al. Influence of surface roughness on print quality on digitally printedself adhesive foils. J Print Media Technol Res. 2013;2:67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Xu R, Fleming PD, Pekarovicova A. The effect of ink jet paper roughness on print gloss. J Imag Sci Technol. 2005;49(6):660–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karademir A, Akgül M, Tutuş A. Kahramanmaraş endüstrisinde enzim kullanımına genel bir bakış: Enzimlerin kabuk soyma, liflerin modifikasyonu, çözünebilir kağıt hamuru ve selüloz üretiminde kullanımı” Forest industry engineering, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, (part 1). KSÜ Sci Eng J. 2002;5(1): 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Karlovits I, Lavrič G, Kavčič U, et al. Electrophotography toner adhesion on agro-industrial residue and invasive plant papers. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021; 1-16, DOI: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1894694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar