Do different irrigating solutions affect the dislodgement resistance of bioceramic-based root canal sealers? A systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Lin GSS, Ghani N, Noorani TY, et al. Dislodgement resistance and adhesive pattern of different endodontic sealers to dentine wall after artificial ageing: an in-vitro study. Odontology. 2021;109(1):149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnermeyer D, Vahdat-Pajouh N, Schafer E, et al. Influence of the final irrigation solution on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based, epoxy resin-based and silicone-based endodontic sealers. Odontology. 2019;107(2):231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokouhinejad N, Hoseini A, Gorjestani H, et al. The effect of different irrigation protocols for smear layer removal on bond strength of a new bioceramic sealer. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(1):10–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Çetinkaya Ý, Bodrumlu E, Koxsak M, et al. Effect of modified NaOCl irrigation solution on bond strength of bioceramic-based root canal sealer to dentin. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(4):574–578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghoneim W, Shaheen N. Effect of different root canal disinfection protocols on push-out bond strength of two endodontic sealers. Tanta Dent J. 2017;14(4):181.
   Google Scholar
• Gundogar M, Sezgin GP, Erkan E, Department of Endodontics, Medipol University Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey, et al. The influence of the irrigant QMix on the push-out bond strength of a bioceramic endodontic sealer. Eur Oral Res. 2019;52(2):64–68.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal S, Raghu R, Shetty A, et al. An in vitro comparative evaluation of the effect of three endodontic chelating agents (17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, 1% peracetic acid, 0.2% chitosan) on the push out bond strength of gutta percha with a new bioceramic sealer (BioRoot RCS). J Conserv Dent. 2019;22(5):475–478.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh S, Podar R, Dadu S, et al. An in vitro comparison of push-out bond strength of biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate in the presence of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate. Endodontology. 2016;28(1):42.
   Google Scholar
• Gernhardt CR, Eppendorf K, Kozlowski A, et al. Toxicity of concentrated sodium hypochlorite used as an endodontic irrigant. Int Endod J. 2004;37(4):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marending M, Paque F, Fischer J, et al. Impact of irrigant sequence on mechanical properties of human root dentin. J Endod. 2007;33(11):1325–1328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnermeyer D, Burklein S, Dammaschke T, et al. Endodontic sealers based on calcium silicates: a systematic review. Odontology. 2019;107(4):421–436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Haddad A, Che Ab Aziz ZA. Bioceramic-Based root canal sealers: a review. Int J Biomater. 2016;2016:9753210.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reyes-Carmona JF, Felippe MS, Felippe WT. The biomineralization ability of mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement on dentin enhances the push-out strength. J Endod. 2010;36(2):286–291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain G, Rajkumar B, C. Boruah L, et al. Influence of different endodontic irrigants on the push-out bond strength of an epoxy-resin based sealer and newly introduced bioceramic sealer to root dentin: an in-vitro study. JDS. 2019;7(1):9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg N, Garg A. Textbook of endodontics. Bengaluru (India): Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Pvt. Limited; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Torabinejad M, Walton RE. Endodontics: principles and practice. Amsterdam (The Netherlands): Saunders/Elsevier; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tronstad L. Clinical endodontics: a textbook. Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann MA, Beer R. Endodontology. Stuttgart (Germany): Thieme; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ford HEP. Endodontics: problem-solving in clinical practice. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Health Assessment and Translation (OHAT). Risk of Bias Assessment Tool [Internet]. National Toxicology Programme (NTP). 2021 [cited June 2021]. Available from: https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/ohat/pubs/riskofbiastool_508.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wikoff D, Urban JD, Harvey S, et al. Role of risk of bias in systematic review for chemical risk assessment: a case study in understanding the relationship between congenital heart defects and exposures to trichloroethylene. Int J Toxicol. 2018;37(2):125–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqaderi H, Lee CT, Borzangy S, et al. Coronal pulpotomy for cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth with closed apices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016;44:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadegh M, Sohrabi H, Kharazifard M, et al. Effect of smear clear and some other commonly used irrigants on dislodgement resistance of mineral trioxide aggregate to root dentin. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(5):e617–e621.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ÇAkici F, ÇAkici EB, Ilker A, et al. Evaluation of effect of disinfection systems on bond strength of root canal sealers. Mid Black Sea J Health Sci. 2020;6(1):92–98.
   Google Scholar
• Yahya MM. The effect of root canal irrigants on the push –out bond strength of biodentine. Tikrit J Dental Sci. 2015;3(1):69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Monga P, Kaur N, Bhandari S, et al. In vitro evaluation of bond strength of sealers after using various irrigants and erbium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser irradiation on radicular dentin surface: a SEM study. Endodontology. 2019;31(1):110.
   Google Scholar
• Rocha AW, de Andrade CD, Leitune VC, et al. Influence of endodontic irrigants on resin sealer bond strength to radicular dentin. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2012;53(1):1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neelakantan P, Berger T, Primus C, et al. Acidic and alkaline chemicals’ influence on a tricalcium silicate-based dental biomaterial. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019;107(2):377–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YL, Lee BS, Lin FH, et al. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials. 2004;25(5):787–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JB, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, et al. Metrologic evaluation of the surface of white MTA after the use of two endodontic irrigants. J Endod. 2007;33(4):463–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YL, Lin FH, Wang WH, et al. Effects of EDTA on the hydration mechanism of mineral trioxide aggregate. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):534–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WP, Chen YY, Huang SH, et al. Limitations of push-out test in bond strength measurement. J Endod. 2013;39(2):283–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan P, Peng B, Fan B, et al. The effects of sodium hypochlorite (5.25%), chlorhexidine (2%), and glyde file prep on the bond strength of MTA-dentin. J Endod. 2006;32(1):58–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adl A, Shojaee NS, Sobhnamayan F, et al. The effect of chlorhexidine on push-out bond strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. Avicenna J Dent Res. 2014;6(1):21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Nandini S, Natanasabapathy V, Shivanna S. Effect of various chemicals as solvents on the dissolution of set white mineral trioxide aggregate: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2010;36(1):135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltz RE, Torabinejad M, Pouresmail M. Quantitative analysis of the solubilizing action of MTAD, sodium hypochlorite, and EDTA on bovine pulp and dentin. J Endod. 2003;29(5):334–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thabane L, Mbuagbaw L, Zhang S, et al. A tutorial on sensitivity analyses in clinical trials: the what, why, when and how. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran L, Tam DNH, Elshafay A, et al. Quality assessment tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro studies: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021;21(1):101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst JA, Howick J, Aronson JK, et al. The need for randomization in animal trials: an overview of systematic reviews. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e98856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggion CM. Jr. Guidelines for reporting pre-clinical in vitro studies on dental materials. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2012;12(4):182–189.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IntHout J, Ioannidis JP, Borm GF, et al. Small studies are more heterogeneous than large ones: a meta-meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(8):860–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washio A, Morotomi T, Yoshii S, et al. Bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer as a promising root canal filling material without semisolid core materials. Materials. 2019;12:23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pane ES, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Critical evaluation of the push-out test for root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2013;39(5):669–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jainaen A, Palamara JE, Messer HH. Push-out bond strengths of the dentine-sealer interface with and without a main cone. Int Endod J. 2007;40(11):882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goracci C, Fabianelli A, Sadek FT, et al. The contribution of friction to the dislocation resistance of bonded fiber posts. J Endod. 2005;31(8):608–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar