Long-term durability assessment of 3D printed concrete

References

• Hou S, Duan Z, Xiao J, et al. A review of 3D printed concrete: performance requirements, testing measurements and mix design. Constr Build Mater. 2021;273:121745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labonnote N, Rønnquist A, Manum B, et al. Additive construction: state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Autom Constr. 2016;72:347–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanoni M, Angst U, Elsener B. Corrosion challenges and opportunities in digital fabrication of reinforced concrete. Paper presented at the RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication; 2018. p. 225–233.
   Google Scholar
• Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, et al. 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2017;12(3):261–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu P, Wang J, Wang X. A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr. 2016;68:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangler T, Roussel N, Bos FP, et al. Digital concrete: a review. Cem Concr Res. 2019;123:105780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini A, Kollmannsberger S, Rank E. Additive manufacturing in construction: a review on processes, applications, and digital planning methods. Addit Manuf. 2019;30:100894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma G, Wang L. A critical review of preparation design and workability measurement of concrete material for largescale 3D printing. Front Struct Civ Eng. 2018;12(3):382–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddika A, Mamun MAA, Ferdous W, et al. 3D-printed concrete: applications, performance, and challenges. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2020;9(3):127–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang J, Dong S, et al. A review of the current progress and application of 3D printed concrete. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf. 2019;125:105533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul SC, van Zijl GP, Tan MJ, et al. A review of 3D concrete printing systems and materials properties: current status and future research prospects. RPJ. 2018;24(4):784–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long W, Tao J, Lin C, et al. Rheology and buildability of sustainable cement-based composites containing micro-crystalline cellulose for 3D-printing. J Cleaner Prod. 2019;239:118054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma G, Li Z, Wang L. Printable properties of cementitious material containing copper tailings for extrusion based 3D printing. Constr Build Mater. 2018;162:613–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, et al. Mix design and fresh properties for high-performance printing concrete. Mater Struct. 2012;45(8):1221–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baz B, Remond S, Aouad G. Influence of the mix composition on the thixotropy of 3D printable mortars. Mag Concr Res. 2022:74(6):
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay YWD, Ting GHA, Qian Y, et al. Time gap effect on bond strength of 3D-printed concrete. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2019;14(1):104–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoshnevis B. Automated construction by contour crafting—related robotics and information technologies. Autom Constr. 2004;13(1):5–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le TT, Austin SA, Lim S, et al. Hardened properties of high-performance printing concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(3):558–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji G, Xiao J, Zhi P, et al. Effects of extrusion parameters on properties of 3D printing concrete with coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater. 2022;325:126740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Zou S, Yu Y, et al. 3D recycled mortar printing: system development, process design, material properties and on-site printing. J Build Eng. 2020;32:101779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Han N, Zhang L, et al. Mechanical and microstructural evolution of 3D printed concrete with polyethylene fiber and recycled sand at elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2021;293:123524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lao W, Li M, Wong TN, et al. Improving surface finish quality in extrusion-based 3D concrete printing using machine learning-based extrudate geometry control. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2020;15(2):178–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baz B, Aouad G, Khalil N, et al. Inter-layer reinforcement of 3D printed concrete elements. Asian J Civ Eng. 2021;22(2):341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Baz B, Aouad G, Remond S. Effect of the printing method and mortar’s workability on pull-out strength of 3D printed elements. Constr Build Mater. 2020;230:117002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baz B, Aouad G, Leblond P, et al. Mechanical assessment of concrete–steel bonding in 3D printed elements. Constr Build Mater. 2020;256:119457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj A, Jones SZ, Kalantar N, et al. Additive manufacturing processes for infrastructure construction: a review. J Manuf Sci Eng. 2019;141(9):091010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukkapatnam S, Mander J, Paal S, et al. 2017. Workshop report—NSF workshop on additive manufacturing (3D printing) for civil infrastructure design and construction. National Science Foundation (NSF), Arlington, VA; 2017 Jul 13–14. Available from: https://events.tti.tamu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/nsf-3dp-workshop-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Samarasinghe DAS, Wood E. Innovative digital technologies. In: Handbook of research on driving transformational change in the digital built environment. Pennsylvania:IGI Global; 2021. p. 142–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ji G, Ding T, Xiao J, et al. A 3D printed ready-mixed concrete power distribution substation: materials and construction technology. Materials. 2019;12(9):1540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet TA, Ahmed ZY, Bos FP, et al. Design of a 3D printed concrete bridge by testing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2018;13(3):222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, et al. Vision of 3D printing with concrete—technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos F, Wolfs R, Ahmed Z, et al. Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: Potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2016;11(3):209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asprone D, Menna C, Bos FP, et al. Rethinking reinforcement for digital fabrication with concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerella VN, Ogura H, Mechtcherine V. Incorporating reinforcement into digital concrete construction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of IASS Annual Symposia; 2018. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vitharana MG, Paul SC, Kong SY, et al. A study on strength and corrosion protection of cement mortar with the inclusion of nanomaterials. Sustain Mater Technol. 2020;25:e00192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buswell RA, De Silva WL, Jones SZ, et al. 3D printing using concrete extrusion: a roadmap for research. Cem Concr Res. 2018;112:37–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Zhang Y, Ramanujan D, et al. The status, challenges, and future of additive manufacturing in engineering. Comput Aided Des. 2015;69:65–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewayde E, Nehdi M, Allouche E, et al. Effect of mixture design parameters and wetting-drying cycles on resistance of concrete to sulfuric acid attack. J Mater Civ Eng. 2007;19(2):155–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panda B, Sonat C, Yang E, et al. Use of magnesium-silicate-hydrate (MSH) cement mixes in 3D printing applications. Cem Concr Compos. 2021;117:103901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerella VN, Näther M, Iqbal A, et al. Inline quantification of extrudability of cementitious materials for digital construction. Cem Concr Compos. 2019;95:260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moelich GM, Kruger J, Combrinck R. Plastic shrinkage cracking in 3D printed concrete. Compos B Eng. 2020;200:108313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baz B, Aouad G, Kleib J, et al. Durability assessment and microstructural analysis of 3D printed concrete exposed to sulfuric acid environments. Constr Build Mater. 2021;290:123220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma L, Zhang Q, Jia Z, et al. Effect of drying environment on mechanical properties, internal RH and pore structure of 3D printed concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2021;315:125731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Putten J, De Schutter G, Van Tittelboom K. The effect of print parameters on the (micro) structure of 3D printed cementitious materials. Paper presented at the RILEM International Conference on Concrete and Digital Fabrication; 2018. p. 234–244.
   Google Scholar
• Rahul AV, Santhanam M, Meena H, et al. Mechanical characterization of 3D printable concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;227:116710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfs RJM, Bos FP, Salet TAM. Hardened properties of 3D printed concrete: the influence of process parameters on interlayer adhesion. Cem Concr Res. 2019;119:132–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. Effects of interlocking on interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in 3D printing of concrete. Autom Constr. 2017;83:212–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zareiyan B, Khoshnevis B. Interlayer adhesion and strength of structures in contour crafting – effects of aggregate size, extrusion rate, and layer thickness. Autom Constr. 2017;81:112–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menéndez E, Matschei T, Glasser FP. 2013. Sulfate attack of concrete. In: Alexander M, Bertron A, De Belie N, editors. Performance of cement-based materials in aggressive aqueous environments. RILEM state-of-the-art reports. Vol. 10. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D. Standard test method for length change of hydraulic-cement mortars exposed to a sulfate solution; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tay YWD, Lim JH, Li M, et al. Creating functionally graded concrete materials with varying 3D printing parameters. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2022;17(3):662–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Cheikh K, Rémond S, Khalil N, et al. Numerical and experimental studies of aggregate blocking in mortar extrusion. Constr Build Mater. 2017;145:452–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalil N, Aouad G, El Cheikh K, et al. Use of calcium sulfoaluminate cements for setting control of 3D-printing mortars. Constr Build Mater. 2017;157:382–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaeb Z, AlSakka F, Hamzeh F. 3D concrete printing: machine design, mix proportioning, and mix comparison between different machine setups. In: 3D concrete printing technology. Melbourne, Australia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019. p. 115–136.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM C. Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar. C1437; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Standard E. 2009. Methods of testing cement-part 1: determination of strength. Ankara: Turkish Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Berger S, Aouad G, Coumes CCD, et al. Leaching of calcium sulfoaluminate cement pastes by water at regulated pH and temperature: experimental investigation and modeling. Cem Concr Res. 2013;53:211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFNOR. Essai Pour Béton Durci—Essai de Porosité et de Masse Volumique—NF; 2010. p. 18–459.
   Google Scholar
• Tian B, Cohen MD. Does gypsum formation during sulfate attack on concrete lead to expansion? Cem Concr Res. 2000;30(1):117–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragoug R, Metalssi OO, Barberon F, et al. Durability of cement pastes exposed to external sulfate attack and leaching: physical and chemical aspects. Cem Concr Res. 2019;116:134–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellmann F, Möser B, Stark J. Influence of sulfate solution concentration on the formation of gypsum in sulfate resistance test specimen. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(2):358–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Bescop P, Solet C. External sulphate attack by ground water: experimental study on CEM I cement pastes. Rev Eur Gén Civ. 2006;10(9):1127–1145.
   Google Scholar
• Xu A, Lu J, Xu J, et al. Sulfate resistance of Portland-limestone cement mortars cured at 20 °C and 60 °C. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2021:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650373.2021.1967813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida N. Sulfate attack on residential concrete foundations in Japan. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2019;8(6):327–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziez MN, Bezzar A. Effect of temperature and type of sand on the magnesium sulphate attack in sulphate resisting Portland cement mortars. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(3):272–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsubone K, Yamaguchi Y, Ogawa Y, et al. Deterioration of concrete immersed in sulfuric acid for a long term. In: Key engineering materials. Vol. 711. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications Ltd.; 2016. p. 659–664.
   Google Scholar
• Vandhiyan R, Kumar KR, Gurumoorthy N, et al. Microstructural characterisation and durability enhancement of concrete with nano silica. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2020;981(3):032071.
   Google Scholar
• Meziane E, Ezziane K, Kenai S, et al. Mechanical, hydration, and durability modifications provided to mortar made with crushed sand and blended cements. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2015;29(18):1987–2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez F, Sobolev K. Nanotechnology in concrete – a review. Constr Build Mater. 2010;24(11):2060–2071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannag MJ. High strength concrete containing natural pozzolan and silica fume. Cem Concr Compos. 2000;22(6):399–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazıcı H. The effect of curing conditions on compressive strength of ultra high strength concrete with high volume mineral admixtures. Build Environ. 2007;42(5):2083–2089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran T, Anand N, Nitish Kumar S, et al. Influence of nano-cementitious materials on improving the corrosion resistance and microstructure characteristics of concrete. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021;35(18):1995–2022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar