Adhesion and colorimetric analysis of acrylate resin-based screen-printed inks on anodized aluminium substrate

References

• Metal. 2006. https://www.nazdar.com/en-us/SCREEN-INKS-Inks-By-Substrate-Substrate-Metal.
   Google Scholar
• Role of resin in printing ink | foreverest resources. 2020. https://foreverest.cn/news-list/role-of-resin-in-printing-ink.
   Google Scholar
• Theohari S, Iakovidis I, Karampotsos A, et al. Printing on anodized aluminium surface. OJAppS. 2016;06(11):783–795.
   Google Scholar
• Parnicka P, Mazierski P, Grzyb T, et al. Influence of the preparation method on the photocatalytic activity of Nd-modified TiO2. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2018;9:447–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poljaček SM, Tomašegović T, Leskovšek M, et al. Effect of SiO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles on the performance of UV visible fluorescent coatings. Coatings. 2021;11(8):928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahović Poljaček S, Tomašegović T, Batušić S. Reproduction of images with special effect inks in screen printing technique. In: Book of proceedings, roadmap to change, 5th international conference of design and graphic arts; ISEC Lisboa and IPT (Publishers), 2019, Lisboa, pp. 192–199.
   Google Scholar
• Kipphan H. Handbook of print media. 1st ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Izdebska J. Printing on polymers: fundamentals and applications. J. Izdebska, S. Thomas (Eds.); 2016. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, UK: pp. 371–388.
   Google Scholar
• Solvent-based screen printing inks | Marabu Printing Inks. 2017. https://www.marabu-inks.com/products/product-overview/screen-printing-inks/solvent-based.html.
   Google Scholar
• Din RU, Nikogeorgos N, Jellesen MS, et al. Influence of steam-based pre-treatment using acidic chemistries on the adhesion performance of powder coated aluminium alloy AA6060. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2017;74:167–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critchlow GW, Brewis DM. Review of surface pretreatments for aluminium alloys. Int J Adhes Adhes. 1996;16(4):255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mui TSM, Silva LLG, Prysiazhnyi V, et al. Polyurethane paint adhesion improvement on aluminium alloy treated by plasma jet and dielectric barrier discharge. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016;30(2):218–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuder HA, Sizemore CA, Whitten MC, et al. Enhanced paint adhesion to metals using in situ phosphatizing coatings. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18(1):123–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob T. Printing materials science and technology. Pira International, Leatherhead, UK; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Faine B. The New Guide to Screenprinting, Simon & Schuster, Sydney, Australia; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Growth in wearable technologies – screen printing mag. 2019. https://screenprintingmag.com/growth-in-wearable-technologies/.
   Google Scholar
• The Future of Screen Printing. 2015. https://www.fespa.com/en/news-media/industry/the-future-of-screen-printing.
   Google Scholar
• Mahović Poljaček S, Tomašegović T, Vugrek G. Influence of the printing plate quality on image reproduction in screen printing. In: Proceedings of XI Conference of Chemists, Technologists and Environmentalists of Republic of Srpska; Faculty of Technology Banja Luka, Banja Luka, 2016. pp. 539–546.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer P, Dmitruk A, Kaczmar JW. Adhesion of functional layers based on epoxy and polyurethane resins for aluminum substrate. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2021;109:102899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabau AS, Jun J, McClurg D. Coating adhesion of a chromate-containing epoxy primer on Al2024-T3 surface processed by laser-interference. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;102:102641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avilés MD, Saurín N, Carrión FJ, et al. Epoxy resin coatings modified by ionic liquid. Study of abrasion resistance. Express Polym. Lett. 2019;13(4):303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batishcheva K, Islamova A. Surface properties of aluminum alloy after laser processing and low-temperature heating. In: AIP conference proceedings. Vol. 2135; 2019. pp. 20012.
   Google Scholar
• Polini W, Sorrentino L. Analysis of adhesion in an aggressive environment of a protective paint coating on an aluminium alloy surface treated by air cold plasma. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18(14):1643–1661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroofi A, Safa NN, Ghomi H. Atmospheric air plasma jet for improvement of paint adhesion to aluminium surface in industrial applications. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2020;98:102554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrino L., G. Napolitano, L. Sorrentino, Wettability improving of 2024 aluminium alloy by oxygen cold plasma treatment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2006;31(5–6):465–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saji VS. Superhydrophobic surfaces and coatings by electrochemical methods – a review. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2022;2022:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim W-S, Kim K-H, Jang C-J, et al. Micro- and nano-morphological modification of aluminum surface for adhesive bonding to polymeric composites. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2013;27(15):1625–1640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theohari S, Kontogeorgou C. Effect of temperature on the anodizing process of aluminum alloy AA 5052. Appl Surf Sci. 2013;284:611–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheasby P.G., S. Wernick, R. Pinner, “Surface treatment and finishing of aluminum and its alloys. Volumes 1 and 2 (5th revised and enlarged edition).” Metals Park, OH: OH/Teddington, England, ASM International/Finishing Publications, Ltd.; 1987
   Google Scholar
• Tsangaraki-Kaplanoglou I, Theohari S, Dimogerontakis T, et al. Effect of alloy types on the anodizing process of aluminum. Surf Coat Technol. 2006;200(8):2634–2641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ata A. The effect of humidity on the adhesion behavior of AC, anodised aluminium. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2008;22(7):733–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M. Switching surface wettability properties. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28(8–9):791–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rider AN. The influence of porosity and morphology of hydrated oxide films on epoxy-aluminium bond durability. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2001;15(4):395–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel R, Blank C, Grundke K, et al. Wettability of methacrylate copolymer films deposited on anodically oxidized and roughened aluminium surfaces. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(3):469–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen W, Hutton B, Liu F. A new understanding on the mechanism of fountain solution in the prevention of ink transfer to the non-image area in conventional offset lithography. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18(15–16):1861–1887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo P, Sugar Land T. T. (US) T. (US); C.S. (US); Shane M. Richard, Deer Park, Magnolia, Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2005/0034197 A1, 1, p. 10–13. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Willfahrt A, Stephens J, Hübner G. Optimising stencil thickness and ink film deposit: an investigation about the preparation of thick film screen printing stencils and their influence on desired thick film ink or paste deposits; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Standard Test Methods for Evaluating the Relative Lightfastness and Weatherability of Printed Matter; n.d. https://www.astm.org/d3424-01.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mahovic Poljaček S, Risović D, Furić K, et al. Comparison of fractal and profilometric methods for surface topography characterization. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;254(11):3449–3458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969;13(8):1741–1747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Żenkiewicz M. Methods for the calculation of surface free energy of solids. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng. 2007;24(1):137–145.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oss CJ, Good RJ, Chaudhury MK. Additive and nonadditive surface tension components and the interpretation of contact angles. Langmuir. 1988;4(4):884–891.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marmur A. Solid-Surface characterization by wetting. Annu Rev Mater Res. 2009;39(1):473–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami D, Jinnai H, Takahara A. Wetting transition from the Cassie-Baxter State to the Wenzel State on textured polymer surfaces. Langmuir. 2014;30(8):2061–2067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzel RN. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem. 1936;28(8):988–994.
   Google Scholar
• Stout KJ, Sullivan PJ, Dong WP, et al. The development of methods for the characterization of roughness in three dimensions. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Blunt L, Jiang X. Advanced techniques for assessment surface topography development of a basis for 3D surface texture standards “SURFSTAND,” ISBN 97819039961192003.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 25178-6002019. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Areal — Part 600: Metrological characteristics for areal topography measuring methods
   Google Scholar
• Israelachvili J. Intermolecular and surface forces, intermolecular and surface forces; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng R, Lin J, Wang PC, et al. Effect of adhesive characteristics on static strength of adhesive-bonded aluminum alloys. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015;57:85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D3359-17 standard test methods for rating adhesion by tape test – free download PDF, 2018. https://kupdf.net/download/astm-d3359-17-standard-test-methods-for-rating-adhesion-by-tape-test_5b756063e2b6f56f300844c3_pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Batishcheva K, Islamova A. Investigation of free surface energy of rough aluminum alloy substrate. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2135; 2019. pp. 20011.
   Google Scholar
• Davis JR. Aluminum and aluminum alloys introduction and overview, light metals and alloys. ASM International, Ohio, US; 2001. pp. 351–416.
   Google Scholar
• Skoneczny W, Niedźwiedź M, Bara M. The effect of production parameters of oxide layers on their nanostructure, nanomorphology, and surface free energy. Applied Sciences. 2018;8(11)2018:2251.
   Google Scholar
• Pukánszky B, Fekete E. Adhesion and surface modification. Adv Polym Sci. 1999;139:109–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar