Testing, modelling, and parameter identification for adhesively bonded joints under the influence of temperature

References

• Da Silva LFM, Campilho RDSG, editors. Advances in numerical modelling of adhesive joints. In: Advances in numerical modeling of adhesive joints. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 1–93.
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva LFM, Öchsner A, Adams RD. Handbook of adhesion technology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Scattina A, Peroni L, Peroni M, et al. Numerical analysis of hybrid joining in car body applications. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25(18):2409–2433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström J. Mechanics of solid polymers: theory and computational modeling. Amsterdam; Boston; Heidelberg; London; New York (NY); Oxford; Paris; San Diego (CA); San Francisco (CA); Singapore; Sydney; Tokyo: Elsevier; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Raghava R, Caddell RM, Yeh GSY. The macroscopic yield behaviour of polymers. J Mater Sci. 1973;8(2):225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra PC, Smith LV. Characterization of adhesive yield criteria usingmixed-mode loading. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(11):1248–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlberger T, Biel A, Stigh U. Influence of temperature and strain rate on cohesive properties of a structural epoxy adhesive. Int J Fract. 2009;155(2):155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana G, Machado J, Carbas R, et al. Strain rate dependence of adhesive joints for the automotive industry at low and high temperatures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2018;32(19):2162–2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tserpes K, Barroso-Caro A, Carraro PA, et al. A review on failure theories and simulation models for adhesive joints. J Adhes. 2022;98(12):1855–1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea MD, Da Silva LFM, Campilho RDSG. Temperature dependence of the fracture toughness of adhesively bonded joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2010;24(11–12):2011–2026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques EAS, Da Silva LFM, Banea MD, et al. Adhesive joints for low- and high-temperature use: an overview. The Journal of Adhesion. 2015;91(7):556–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia Z, Yuan G, Hui D, et al. Effect of high loading rate and low temperature on mode I fracture toughness of ductile polyurethane adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(1):79–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea MD, Silva L, Campilho R. Effect of temperature on tensile strength and mode I fracture toughness of a high temperature epoxy adhesive. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2012;26(7):939–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banea MD, da Silva L, Campilho R. Effect of temperature on the shear strength of aluminium single lap bonded joints for high temperature applications. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2014;28(14–15):1367–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LF, das Neves PJ, Adams RD, et al. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—part I: literature survey. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2009;29(3):319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn O, Kurzok J, Oeter M, et al. Studiengesellschaft Stahlanwendung, Stahl-Informations-Zentrum. Untersuchungen zum crashverhalten geklebter und hybridgefügter stahlblechverbindungen. Düsseldorf: Verlag u. Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Brede M, Heise F-J. Methodenentwicklung zur berechnung von höherfesten stahlklebverbindungen des fahrzeugbaus unter crashbelastung: Forschungsvorhaben. Düsseldorf: Verlag und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH; 2008. p. 676.
   Google Scholar
• Burbulla F, Böhme W, Brede M, et al. Robustheit und zuverlässigkeit der berechnungsmethoden von klebeverbindungen mit hochfesten stahlblechen unter crashbedingungen – 2. Entwurf: Forschungsvorhaben; 2012. p. 828.
   Google Scholar
• Gurson AL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I – yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater Technol. 1977;99(1):2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lion A, Matzenmiller A, Meschut G, et al. Methodenentwicklung zur simulation und bewertung fertigungs- und betriebsbedingter klebschichtschädigungen infolge temperaturwechselbeanspruchung. FOSTA-Berichte; Düsseldorf: Verlag u. Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Grant L, Adams RD, da Silva LF. Effect of the temperature on the strength of adhesively bonded single lap and T joints for the automotive industry. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2009;29(5):535–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Structural adhesives – determination of shear behaviour of structural bonds – part 2: thick adherends shear test (ISO 11003-2:2001, modified). German version EN 14869-2 2011-07. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsches Institut für Normung e.V. Adhesives – determination of tensile strength of butt joints (ISO 6922). Modified German version EN 15870:2009 2009-08. Berlin: Beuth Verlag GmbH; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzkopf G, Bobbert M, Teutenberg D, et al. Tolerance analysis of adhesive bonds in crash simulation. Procedia CIRP. 2016;43:321–326.
   Google Scholar
• Burbulla F. Kontinuumsmechanische und bruchmechanische modelle für werkstoffverbunde. Kassel: Kassel University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• LSTC, editor. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual Volume II Material Models: LS-DYNA R11; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Burbulla F, Matzenmiller A. Crashsimulation von Kleberverbindungen des Rohkarosseriebaus. LS-DYNA Anwenderforum; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan JN, McGarry FJ. Effect of rubber particle size on deformation mechanisms in glassy epoxy. Polym Eng Sci. 1973;13(1):29–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson RA, Yee AF. Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies. J Mater Sci. 1989;24(7):2571–2580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needleman A, Rice JR. Limits to ductility set by plastic flow localization. In: Koistinen DP, Wang N-M, editors. Mechanics of sheet metal forming. Boston (MA): Springer US; 1979. p. 237–267.
   Google Scholar
• Gurson AL. Plastic flow and fracture behavior of ductile materials, incorporating void nucleation, growth, and interaction; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Lemaitre J. A course on damage mechanics. Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Rabatnov YN. Creep rupture: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Applied Mechanics. Applied Mechanics – Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Applied Mechanics; 1968. p. 342–349.
   Google Scholar
• Kachanov LM, Leipholz HHE, Oravas GAE. Introduction to continuum damage mechanics. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Chaboche JL. Continuum damage mechanics: present state and future trends. Nucl Eng Des. 1987;105(1):19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemaitre J. A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. J Eng Mater Technol. 1985;107(1):83–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GR, Cook WH. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech. 1985;21(1):31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Tang Z, Hong X. Inverse parameter identification for hyperelastic model of a polyurea. Polymers. 2021;13(14):2253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlein J, Wituschek S, Lechner M, et al. Inverse parameter identification of an anisotropic plasticity model for sheet metal. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021;1157(1):012004.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zeng K. Parameter optimization of particle-reinforced adhesive bonded joints based on the response surface method. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2022:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancello E, Goglio L, Stainier L, et al. Identification of the strain rate parameters for structural adhesives. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2008;22(13):1523–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doh J, Hur SH, Lee J. Viscoplastic parameter identification of temperature-dependent mechanical behavior of modified polyphenylene oxide polymers. Polym Eng Sci. 2019;59(S1):E200–E211.
   Google Scholar