A numerical study on stress mitigation in through-thickness tailored bi-adhesive single-lap joints

References

• Worrall C, Ewen Kellar CV. Joining of fibre-reinforced polymer composites. A good practice guide. Composites UK Audley House, Northbridge Road, Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire; 2020. p. 1–77.
   Google Scholar
• Akhavan-Safar A, Ramezani F, Delzendehrooy F, et al. A review on bi-adhesive joints: benefits and challenges. Int J Adhes. 2022;114:103098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeevi G, Nayak SK, Abdul Kader M. Review on adhesive joints and their application in hybrid composite structures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019;33(14):1497–1520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goland M, Reissner E. The stresses in cemented joints. J Appl Mech. 1944;11(1):A17–A27.
   Google Scholar
• Adams RD, Peppiatt NA. Stress analysis of adhesive-bonded lap joints. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 1974;9(3):185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JH. Stresses in adhesive between dissimilar adherends. J Adhes. 1975;7(2):97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigwood DA, Crocombe AD. Elastic analysis and engineering design formulae for bonded joints. Int J Adhes. 1989;9(4):229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleich DM, Van Tooren MJL, Beukers A. Analysis and evaluation of bondline thickness effects on failure load in adhesively bonded structures. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2001;15(9):1091–1101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancaktar E, Simmons SR. Optimization of adhesively-bonded single lap joints by adherend notching. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(11):1363–1404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nirantar, P, & Sancaktar, E. Optimization of Adhesively Bonded Single Lap Joints by Tapering of Adherends. Proceedings of the ASME 2002 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. Design Engineering. New Orleans, Louisiana, USA. November 17–22, 2002. pp. 575-588. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2002-33432
   Google Scholar
• Crocombe AD, Adams RD. Influence of the spew fillet and other parameters on the stress distribution in the single lap joint. J Adhes. 1981;13(2):141–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adin H. The effect of angle on the strain of scarf lap joints subjected to tensile loads. Appl Math Model. 2012;36(7):2858–2867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RY, Soni SR. Experimental and analytical studies on the onset of delamination in laminated composites. J Compos Mater. 1984;18(1):70–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F M da Silva L, D Adams R. Techniques to reduce the peel stresses in adhesive joints with composites. Int J Adhes. 2007;27(3):227–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancaktar E, Nirantar P. Increasing strength of single lap joints of metal adherends by taper minimization. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2003;17(5):655–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campilho RDSG, Pinto AMG, Banea MD, et al. Strength improvement of adhesively-bonded joints using a reverse-bent geometry. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25(18):2351–2368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özel A, Aydin M, Temiż Ş. The effects of overlap length and adherend thickness on the strength of adhesively bonded joints subjected to bending moment. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2004;18(3):313–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkersen O. Die nietkraftverteilung in zugbeanspruchten nietverbindungen mit konstanten laschenquerschnitten. Luftfahrtforschung. 1938;15:41–48.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael C. Variable-adhesive bonded joints(stresses in ordinary lap joint compared to variable adhesive joint). Struct Adhes Bond Symp Hoboken, N J Stevens Inst Tech. 1966:99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Hart-Smith LJ. Adhesive-bonded single-lap joints. Technical report. Hampton (VA): N.A.S.A. Langely Reasearch Center; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas S. Nasa technical note, (NASA TN D-7855) (NASA-3M-D-7855) analysis of bonded joints. Hampton (VA); Langely Reasearch Center; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick RL. >Structural adhesives with emphasis on aerospace applications. Treatise on adhesion and adhesives. CRC Press, Marcel Dekker, INC.; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Sancaktar E, Kumar S. Selective use of rubber toughening to optimize lap-joint strength. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(10):1265–1296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires I, Quintino L, Durodola JF, et al. Performance of bi-adhesive bonded aluminium lap joints. Int J Adhes. 2003;23(3):215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires I, Quintino L, Miranda RM. Numerical simulation of Mono- and bi-adhesive aluminium lap joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2006;20(1):19–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitton MD, Broughton JG. Variable modulus adhesives: an approach to optimised joint performance. Int J Adhes. 2005;25(4):329–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B. Theoretical stress model of mixed-modulus single-lap adhesive bonded joints considering the bending effect. J Mech Eng. 2008;44(10):129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Stein N, Mardani H, Becker W. An efficient analysis model for functionally graded adhesive single lap joints. Int J Adhes. 2016;70:117–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Lu ZH, Lu YN. Closed-form solutions for elastic stress–strain analysis in unbalanced adhesive single-lap joints considering adherend deformations and bond thickness. Int J Adhes. 2011;31(6):434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Kumar S, Reddy JN. Material-tailored adhesively bonded multilayers: a theoretical analysis. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;148:246–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, das Neves PJC, Adams RD, et al. Analytical models of adhesively bonded joints—part I: literature survey. Int J Adhes. 2009;29(3):319–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Neves PJC, Da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Analysis of mixed adhesive bonded joints part I: theoretical formulation. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(1):1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Neves PJC, Da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Analysis of mixed adhesive bonded joints part II: parametric study. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(1):35–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa T, Nakano K, Toratani H. A two-dimensional stress analysis of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to tensile loads. J Adhes Sci Technol. 1997;11(8):1039–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawa T, Liu J, Nakano K, et al. Two-dimensional stress analysis of single-lap adhesive joints of dissimilar adherends subjected to tensile loads. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2000;14(1):43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range. Int J Adhes. 2007;27(5):362–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva LFM, Adams RD. Adhesive joints at high and low temperatures using similar and dissimilar adherends and dual adhesives. Int J Adhes. 2007;27(3):216–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton SE, Waas AM, Arnold SM. Functionally graded adhesives for composite joints. Int J Adhes. 2012;35:36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbas RJC, Da Silva LFM, Critchlow GW. Adhesively bonded functionally graded joints by induction heating. Int J Adhes. 2014;48:110–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado JJM, Marques EAS, da Silva LFM. Influence of low and high temperature on mixed adhesive joints under quasi-static and impact conditions. Compos Struct. 2018;194:68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Pandey PC. Behaviour of bi-adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2010;24(7):1251–1281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer H, Öz Ö. Comparative evaluation of numerical and analytical solutions to the biadhesive single-lap joint. Math Prob Eng. 2014;2014:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özer H, Öz Ö. Three dimensional finite element analysis of bi-adhesively bonded double lap joint. Int J Adhes. 2012;37:50–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wardle BL, Arif MF. Strength and performance enhancement of bonded joints by spatial tailoring of adhesive compliance via 3D printing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(1):884–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Wardle BL, Arif MF, et al. Stress reduction of 3D printed compliance-tailored multilayers. Adv Eng Mater. 2018;20(1):1700883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramezani F, Ayatollahi MR, Akhavan-Safar A, et al. A comprehensive experimental study on bi-adhesive single lap joints using DIC technique. Int J Adhes. 2020;102:102674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frascio M, de Sousa Marques EA, Carbas RJC, et al. Review of tailoring methods for joints with additively manufactured adherends and adhesives. Materials. 2020;13(18):3949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J JA, Schneider J, Schiffer A, et al. Dynamic crushing of tailored honeycombs realized via additive manufacturing. Int J Mech Sci. 2022;219:107126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaid J, Schneider J, Deshpande VS, et al. Multifunctionality of nanoengineered self‐sensing lattices enabled by additive manufacturing. Adv Eng Mater. 2022;24(7):2200194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaid J, Wardle BL, Kumar S. Strength and performance enhancement of multilayers by spatial tailoring of adherend compliance and morphology via multimaterial jetting additive manufacturing. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazir A, Jeng JY. A high-speed additive manufacturing approach for achieving high printing speed and accuracy. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2020;234(14):2741–2749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmann AJ, Setter RN, Dahmen V, et al. Additively manufactured b-stage epoxy for adhesive bonding in composite structures. Proceedings of the CAMX. 2018:11.
   Google Scholar
• Dahmen V, Redmann AJ, Austermann J, et al. Fabrication of hybrid composite T-joints by co-curing with 3D printed dual cure epoxy. Compos Part B Eng. 2020;183:107728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratasys. VeroWhitePlusTM RGD835 [Internet]. Available from: https://hub.stratasys.com/s/product
   Google Scholar
• 6.21 A. ABAQUS/CAE User’s Manual [Internet]. ABAQUS/CAE User’s Man; 2021. Available from: https://www.3ds.com/support/hardware-and-software/simulia-system-information/abaqus-2021/
   Google Scholar
• 3M. 3MTM Scotch-WeldTM Epoxy Adhesive DP490 [Internet]; 1996. Available from: https://www.3mindia.in/3M/en_IN/p/d/v100940156/
   Google Scholar
• LOCTITE. Description: LOCTITE ESP110 [Internet]; 2010. Available from: https://static.rapidonline.com/pdf/87-7343_v1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goglio L, Rossetto M. Evaluation of the singular stresses in adhesive joints. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2009;23(10-11):1441–1457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andruet RH, Dillard DA, Holzer SM. Two- and three-dimensional geometrical nonlinear finite elements for analysis of adhesive joints. Int J Adhes. 2001;21(1):17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar