354
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
PART ONE: Theoretical-Methodological View of the Evaluation of Welfare Systems

The Implications of the Rationality of Decision-Makers on the Utilization of Evaluation Findings

&
Pages 1223-1240 | Published online: 13 Aug 2008

REFERENCES

  • Patton , M. Q. 1997 . Utilization-Focused evaluation. The New Century Text, , 3rd , xiv Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications .
  • Rossi , P. H. , Freeman , H. E. and Lipsey , M. W. 1999 . Evaluation: A systematic approach , 6th , 55 Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications .
  • Simon , H. A. 1997 . Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations , Fourth , New York : The Free Press .
  • Braybrooke , D. and Lindblom , C. E. 1970 . A strategy of decision: Policy evaluation as a social process , New York : The Free Press .
  • Weiss , C. H. 1977 . “ Introduction ” . In Using social research in public policy making , Edited by: Weiss , C. H. 10 Lexington, Toronto : Lexington Books .
  • Weiss , C. H. 1988 . Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care? . Evaluation Practice , 9 ( 1 ) : 6
  • Brubaker , R. 1984 . The limits of rationality: An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. Controversies in Sociology 16 , 50 – 51 . London : George Allen & Unwin .
  • 8. Ibid, pp. 53–55.
  • 9. Ibid, p. 56.
  • 10. Ibid.
  • Lindblom , C. E. 1984 . “ The science of “muddling through” . In A reader in planning theory , Edited by: Faludi , A. 154 – 155 . Oxford : Pergamon Press .
  • Cohen , M. D. , March , J. G. and Olsen , J. P. 1972 . A garbage can model of organizational choice . Administrative Science Quarterly , 17 ( 1 ) : 1 – 25 .
  • Simon , H. A. 1997 . Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations , Fourth , New York : The Free Press .
  • Caudle , S. L. 1989 . “ Evaluating program results and success ” . In Managing public programs: balancing politics, administration, and public needs , Edited by: Cleary , R. E. , Henry , N. and Associates . 231 San Francisco, London : Jossey-Bass .
  • 15. Ibid., pp. 231–232.
  • Rose , R. 1984 . Understanding big government: The programme approach , 19 London : Sage Publications .
  • 17. Patton, op. cit., p. 65.
  • Henry , G. T. 2003 . Influential evaluations . American Journal of Evaluation , 24 ( 4 ) : 515 – 524 .
  • 19. Weiss, op. cit., pp. 15–17.
  • 20. Rossi, op. cit., p. 39.
  • Wholey , J. S. 2001 . “ Managing for results: Roles for evaluators in a new management era ” . In American Journal of Evaluation Vol. 22 , 343 – 347 .
  • 22. Weiss, op. cit., p. 5.
  • Lindblom , C. E. 1977 . Politics and markets: The world's political-economic systems , 120 New York : Basic Books, Inc., Publishers .
  • Weiss , C. H. 1975 . “ Evaluation research in the political context. Eds ” . In Handbook of evaluation research, Vol. 1 , Edited by: Struening , E. L. and Guttentag , M. 31 – 45 . 235 Beverly Hills : Sage Publications . quoted in Caudle, op. cit.,
  • e.g. Nutt, P. C., & and Backoff , R. W. 1992 . Strategic management of public and third sector organizations: A handbook for leaders , San Francisco : Jossey-Bass Publishers . Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy, Sixth Edition, Harlow etc.: Prentice-Hall. Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement, 3rd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • 26. Patton, op. cit., p. 20.
  • 27. Weiss, C. H., Murphy-Graham, E., & Birkeland, S. An alternative route to policy influence. American Journal of Evaluation 2005, 26 (1), 344. Henry, G. T., & Mark, M. M. Beyond use: Understanding evaluation's influence on attitudes and actions. American Journal of Evaluation 2003, 24 (3), 294. Rich, R. F. (1977). Uses of social science information by federal bureaucrats: Knowledge for action versus knowledge for understanding. In C. H. Weiss, Ed., Using social research in public policy making. Lexington, Toronto: Lexington Books pp. 199–211. Knorr, K. D. Policymakers' use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? In Weiss, C. H., Ed., Using Social Research in Public Policy Making. Lexington, Toronto: Lexington Books, 1977, pp. 165–182.
  • Patton , M. Q. 2001 . Evaluation, knowledge management, best practices, and high quality: Lessons learned . American Journal of Evaluation , 22 ( 3 ) : 332
  • 29. Henry & Mark, op. cit.
  • 30. Rich, op. cit., p. 200.
  • 31. Lindblom & Cohen, op. cit., p. 1.
  • Preskill , H. and Caracelli , V. 1997 . Current and developing conception of use: Evaluation use TIG Survey Results . Evaluation Practice , 18 : 215
  • 33. Henry & Mark, op. cit., p. 294. Patton, op. cit.
  • Pollitt , C. 2003 . The Essential public manager , 120 Maidenhead, Philadelphia : Open University Press .
  • Henkel , M. 1991 . Government, evaluation and change , 23 – 24 . London : Jessica Kingsley Publishers .
  • 36. Pollitt, op. cit., pp. 122–123.
  • 37. Pollitt, op. cit., p. 124.
  • 38. Patton, op. cit.
  • Nutt , P. C. 2002 . Selecting Decision Rules for Crucial Choices: An Investigation of the Thompson Framework . The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 38 ( 1 ) : 99 – 133 .
  • Thompson , J. D. 1967 . Organizations in action: Social science bases of administrative theory , New York : Mc Graw-Hill Book Company .
  • Rittel , H. and Webber , M. 1973 . Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences , 4 : 155 – 169 .
  • 42. Simon, op. cit.
  • Wholey , J. S. 2001 . Managing for results: Roles for evaluators in a new management era . American Journal of Evaluation , 22 ( 3 ) : 345
  • Caplan , N. 1997 . “ A Minimal set of conditions necessary for the utilization of social science knowledge in policy formulation at the national level. Ed ” . In Using Social Research in Public Policy Making , Edited by: Weiss , C. H. 185 Lexington, Toronto : Lexington Books .
  • Pawson , R. and Tilley , N. 1997 . Realistic evaluation , 85 London : SAGE Publications .
  • Van der Knaap , P. 2004 . Theory-based evaluation and learning: Possibilities and challenges . Evaluation , 10 ( 1 ) : 17
  • Van der Knaap, Ibid . 2004 . Evaluation , 10 ( 1 ) : 18 – 25 .
  • 48. Van der Knaap, Ibid., p. 26.
  • Iriti , J. E. , Bickel , W. E. and Nelson , C. A. 2005 . Using recommendations in evaluation: A decision-making framework for evaluators . American Journal of Evaluation , 26 ( 4 ) : 473
  • 50. Patton, op. cit., pp. 16–17.
  • 51. Weiss et al., op. cit., p. 13.
  • 52. Caplan, op. cit., p. 185.
  • 53. Caplan, op. cit., p. 185.
  • e.g. Fetterman , D. M. , Kaftarian , S. J. and Wandersman , A. , eds. 1996 . Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability , Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Sage Publications . Patton, op. cit. See also Vartiainen, P. (1994). Palveluorganisaatioiden tuloksellisuusarviointi, teoriat ja käytäntö: Päivähoitoon, erityisesti päiväkoteihin kohdistuva monitahoarviointi. Acta Wasaensia No. 40, Hallintotiede 2; Vaasa: Vaasan yliopisto.
  • 55. Patton, op. cit.
  • Torres , R. and Preskill , H. 2001 . Evaluation and organizational learning: Past, present, and future . American Journal of Evaluation , 22 ( 3 ) : 387 – 395 .
  • Chen , H. T. 1990 . Theory-Driven evaluations , Newbury Park : Sage Publications .
  • 58. See also Iriti, et al., op. cit., p. 472.
  • 59. Torres & Preskill, op. cit. 389.
  • Graff, F., & Christou, M. In evidence lies change: The research of Whiting Professor Carol Weiss. Harvard Graduate School of Education, HGSE News, 10.9.2001: http://www.gse.harvard.edu/news/features/weiss09102001.html

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.