Open Source Governance—A More Ambitious Cousin of Collaborative Governance

REFERENCES

• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(Special Issue: Collaborative Public Management), 56–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, C., Kraus, M. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Keltner, D. (2012). The local-ladder effect: Social status and subjective well-being. Psychological Science. doi:10.1177/0956797611434537
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenilla, M. (2010). Concepts in democratic theory. In D. R. Insua & S. French (Eds.), e-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective (pp. 15–30). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Azfar, O., Kähkönen, S., Lanyi, A., & Meagher, P. (1999). Decentralization, governance, and public services: The impact of institutional arrangements (Working Paper No. 255). Center for Institutional Reform and the Informal Sector, University of Maryland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2002). Coase’s penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. The Yale Law Journal, 112, 369–446. doi:10.2307/1562247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 394–419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B. (2011). Collaborative governance. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 386–402). New Delhi, India: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, D. R. (2010). Peer participation and software: What Mozilla has to teach government. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Panke, D. (2007). Network governance: Effective and legitimate? In E. Sørensen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 153–169). Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carreras, A., & Franco, A. F. (2010). Problem-structuring methods for e-democracy. In D. R. Insua & S. French (Eds.), e-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective (pp. 49–63). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Catlaw, T. J., & Sandberg, B. (2012). “Dangerous Government”: Info-liberalism, active citizenship, and the open government directive. Administration & Society. Published online 29 November 2012. doi:10.1177/0095399712461912
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J. P. (2012). Bundling information goods. In M. Peitz & J. Waldofogel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the digital economy (pp. 273–305). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. (2009). The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 22, 529–544. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1433815
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, G. G., & Tran, C. C. (2012). Securing government transparency: Cybersecurity policy issues in a Gov 2.0 environment and beyond. In K. Andreasson (Ed.), Cybersecurity: Public sector threats and responses (pp. 233–255). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demil, B., & Lecocq, X. (2006). Neither market nor hierarchy nor network: The emergence of bazaar governance. Organization Studies, 27, 1447–1466. doi:10.1177/0170840606067250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, J. D., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). Collaborative governance: Private roles for public goals in turbulent times. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., & Galunic, D. C. (2001). Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1229–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everingham, J., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2012). Collaborative governance of ageing: Challenges for local government in partnering with the seniors’ sector. Local Government Studies, 38, 161–181. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.615834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francq, P. (2009). E-democracy: The social software perspective. In M. Litras, R. Rennyson, & R. Ordóñez de Pablos (Eds.), Knowledge networks: The social software perspective (pp. 61–74). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• French, S. (2010). Decision support systems. In D. R. Insua & S. French (Eds.), e-Democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective (pp. 65–82). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K., & Jensen, M. J. (2011). E-democracy writ small. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 177–197. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2010.490558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getha-Taylor, H. (2007). Collaborative governance: Lessons from Katrina. The Public Manager, 36, 7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity: A platform for designing business architecture. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hang, J., Hohensohn, H., Mayr, K., & Wieland, T. (2005). Benefits and pitfalls of open source in commercial contexts. In S. Koch (Ed.), Free/open source software development (pp. 222–242). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, D. L. (2005). Open government: An American tradition faces national security, privacy, and other challenges. New York, NY: Chelsea House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Iannacci, F. (2005). Coordination processes in open source software development: The Linux case study. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 7, 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jäppinen, T. (2011). New user-driven innovation policy: The key to Finnish local government service reform. In A. Anttiroiko, S. J. Bailey, & P. Valkama (Eds.), Innovations in public governance (pp. 158–174). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22, 911–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattel, R., Randma-Liiv, T., & Kalvet, T. (2011). Small states, innovation and administrative capacity. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership (pp. 61–82). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, G. E. (2003). e-Democracy and participatory decision processes: Lessons from e-negotiation experiments. Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 12, 127–143. doi:10.1002/mcda.352
   Google Scholar
• Khaleghian, P. (2004). Decentralization and public services: The case of immunization. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 163–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, B. J., Kavanaugh, A. L., & Hult, K. M. (2011). Civic engagement and internet use in local governance: Hierarchical linear models for understanding the role of local community groups. Administration & Society, 43, 807–835. doi:10.1177/0095399711413873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, R. N. (2003). The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 351–385. doi:10.1093/icc/12.2.351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (Eds.). (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, D. P. (2011). The capacity for civic engagement: Public and private worlds of the self. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. K. (2012). Open source, crowdsourcing, and public engagement. In E. Downey & M. A. Jones (Eds.), Public service, governance and web 2.0 technologies: Future trends in social media (pp. 181–199). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 5-8 Jan. 2004, pp. 1–10. New York, NY: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300
   Google Scholar
• Martin, L. L. (2004). Bridging the gap between contract service delivery and public financial management: Applying theory to practice. In A. Khan & W. B. Hildreth (Eds.), Financial management theory in the public sector (pp. 55–71). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50, 370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, A. (2007). Open government. In M. Bevir (Ed.), Encyclopedia of governance. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGhie-Richmond, D., & Winter, E. (2011). Considerations for effective collaborative practice: A reflection on the use of case studies in on-line teacher education learning spaces. In F. Pozzi & D. Persico (Eds.), Techniques for fostering collaboration in online learning communities: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J., Deirdre, C., & Maarten, H. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 10–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Ainscow, M., Chapman, C., & West, M. (2011). Collaboration and networking in education. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J. (2005). Professionals and the conflicting forces of administrative modernization and civic engagement. The American Review of Public Administration, 35, 311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. (2011). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, J., Barnes, M., Sullivan, H., & Knops, A. (2004). Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobelius, D. (2004). Towards the sixth generation of R&D management. International Journal of Project Management, 2, 369–375.
   Google Scholar
• Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies: Transparency and open government. Whitehouse Press Office. Retrieved June 6, 2012 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, T. (2010). Government as a platform. In D. Lathrop & L. Ruma (Eds.), Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Sebastopol, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlicek, R. C. (2000). Embracing insanity: Open source software development (p. 11). Indianapolis, IN: Sams.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. S. (Ed.). (1996). The New Hacker’s dictionary (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, E. S. (1999). The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, T. (2001). Collaboration in action: An uncertain process. Administration in Social Work, 25, 53–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. C. (2011). Beyond smokestacks and silos: Open-source, web-enabled coordination in organizations and networks. Public Administration Review, 71, 677–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P. J., & Choi, T. (2011). Deliberation, consensus, and stakeholder satisfaction: A simulation of collaborative governance. Public Manager Review, 14, 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, R., & Stiedl, D. (2001). Decentralization of road administration: Case studies in Africa and Asia. Public Administration & Development, 21, 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Røiseland, A. (2011). Understanding local governance: Institutional forms of collaboration. Public Administration, 89, 879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S. K. (2006). Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development. Management Science, 52, 1000–1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sifry, M. L. (2011). WikiLeaks and the age of transparency. Minneapolis, MN: BookMobile.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, C., & West, J. (2006). Knowledge networks and the geographic locus of innovation. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vahaverbeke, & J. West (Eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C. (2010). When should the public be involved in public management? Design principles with case applications. In R. O’Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world: The Minnowbrook perspective. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuzzi, A., Padovani, C., & Nesti, G. (2007). Communication and (e)democracy: Assessing European e-democracy discourses. In B. Cammaerts & N. Carpentier (Eds.), Reclaiming the media communication rights and democratic media roles. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, S. (2004). The success of open source. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, T., & Dutfield, G. (Eds.). (2011). Intellectual property and human development: Current trends and future scenarios. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeats, D. (2007). Morality and pragmatism in free software and open source. In K. St. Amant & B. Still (Eds.), Handbook of research on open source software: Technological, economic and social perspectives. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Zadek, S. (2008). Global collaborative governance: There is no alternative. Corporate Governance, 8, 374–388.
   Google Scholar