Performance Management in the Public Sector: Does It Decrease or Increase Innovation and Performance?

REFERENCES

• Alexy, O., & Leitner, M. (2011). A fistful of dollars: Are financial rewards a suitable management practice for distributed models of innovation? European Management Review, 8, 165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 14–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., & Pallesen, T. (2008). ‘Not just for the money?’ How financial incentives affect the number of publications at Danish research institutions. International Public Management Journal, 11, 28–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2006). Motivation crowding and the federal civil servant: Evidence from the U.S. internal revenue service. International Public Management Journal, 9, 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A., & Chen, A. A. (2007). Performance targets and public service improvement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 455–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Crow, M. (1991). Red tape and technology transfer success in government laboratories. Journal of Technology Transfer, 16, 29–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 58, 109–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, G. A. (2008). Employee and organizational performance. In J. Perry & A. Hondeghem ( Eds.), Motivation in public management. The call of public service ( pp. 136–156). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bysted, R., & Jespersen, K. R. (2014). Exploring managerial mechanisms that influence innovative work behavior: Comparing private and public employees. Public Management Review, 16(2), 217–241. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2009). Microeconometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, I., Hall, B. H., Powell, W., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Patent data project—NSF proposal. Retrieved May 10, 2013 from http://emlab.berkeley.edu/users/bhhall/papers/CHPT_NSF_%20litreview_updated.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2009). Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 495–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., R.Koestner, & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeHart-Davis, L., & Pandey, S. (2005). Red tape and public employees: Does perceived rule dysfunction alienate managers? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 133–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ederer, F., & Manso, G. (Forthcoming). Is pay-for-performance detrimental to innovation? Management Science. Retrieved May 10, 2013 from http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/manso/em.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 652–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, S., & Moldogaziev, T. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, B. (1997). Not just for the money. An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(5), 589–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgellis, Y., Iossa, E., & Tabvuma, V. (2011). Crowding out intrinsic motivation in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(3), 473–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. M., Farr, J. L., Neff, N. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. B. (2011). Antecedents of organizational innovation: The diffusion of new public management into Danish local government. Public Administration, 89(2), 285–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J. (2002). Outcomes–based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, C. J., & Marschke, G. (2010). Incentives and their dynamics in public sector performance management systems. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(1), 183–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B. (2012). Management interventions and motivation crowding effects in public service provision. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2014). Performance management for academic researchers: How publication command systems affect individual behavior. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34(2), 84–107. doi:10.1177/0734371X13510850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, C. B., Hvitved, J., & Andersen, L. B. (2013). Command and motivation: How the perception of external interventions relates to intrinsic motivation and public service motivation. Public Administration. Advance Online Publication. Retrieved October 17, 2014. doi:10.1111/padm.12024
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldsen, A. M. (2012). Dynamics of public service motivation. Aarhus, Denmark: Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2003). Motivation, agency, and public policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, M. F., Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2012). How can managers affect employees’ perception of command systems?: A study of school principals’ implementation of obligatory student plans. Paper presented at IRSPM 2012 Conference, Rome, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, J. M., & Bretschneider, S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from a simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(2), 273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, P. (2013). Patents and innovation: Evidence from economic history. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(1), 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, S., & Bretschneider, S. (1997). The impact of red tape’s administrative delay on public organizations’ interest in new information technology. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7, 113–130.
   Google Scholar
• Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 12, 122–137.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauermann, H., & Cohen, W. M. (2010). What makes them tick? Employee motives and firm innovation. Management Science, 56(12), 2134–2153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented Inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, J. E. (2005). A framework for assessing incentives in results-based management. Public Administration Review, 65, 592–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, K. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 77–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., &Fotel, T. (2009). Democratic anchorage of infrastructural governance networks: The case of the Femern belt forum. Planning Theory, 8, 282–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., Damanpour, F., & Devece, C. A. (2011). Management innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibel, A., Rost, K., & Osterloh, M. (2010). Pay for performance in the public sector—Benefits and (hidden) costs. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(2), 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). E-Government and bureaucracy: Toward a better understanding of intranet implementation and its effect on red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 379–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, F. R., & Woodman, R. W. (2010). Innovative behaviour in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 323–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal (AMJ), 53, 107–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghi, C., Mohr, R. D., & Meyer, P. B. (2010). Workplace organization and innovation. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 622–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar