E-Government and Corruption: A Longitudinal Analysis of Countries

REFERENCES

• Ali, A. M., & Isse, H. S. (2003). Determinants of economic corruption: A cross-country comparison. CATO Journal, 22(3), 449.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201–210. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2008.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. (2007). Solving China’s rebalancing puzzle. Finance and Development, 44(3), 32–35.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H. (1995). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baltagi, B. H., Bresson, G., & Pirotte, A. (2003). Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman–Taylor?: A pretest estimator. Economics Letters, 79(3), 361–369. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan, P. (1997). Corruption and development: A review of issues. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(3), 1320–1346. doi:10.2307/2729979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S. (2003). E-government and access to information. In Transparency International (Ed.), Global corruption report 2003: Access to information (pp. 24–32). London, England: Profile Books Ltd..
   Google Scholar
• Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A free press is bad news for corruption. Journal of Public Economics,87(7–8), 1801–1824. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00186-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271–300. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E. C. C., & Golden, M. A. (2007). Electoral systems, district magnitude and corruption. British Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 115–137. doi:10.2307/4497282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B.-D. (2004). E-government to combat corruption: The case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719–735. doi:10.1081/pad-200029114
   Google Scholar
• Damania, R., Fredriksson, P., & Mani, M. (2004). The persistence of corruption and regulatory compliance failures: Theory and evidence. Public Choice, 121(3–4), 363–390. doi:10.1007/s11127-004-1684-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiRienzo, C. E., Das, J., Cort, K. T., & Burbridge, J. J. (2007). Corruption and the role of information. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(2), 320–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbahnasawy, N. G., & Revier, C. F. (2012). The determinants of corruption: Cross-country-panel-data analysis. The Developing Economies, 50(4), 311–333. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1049.2012.00177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence across countries. Journal of Public Economics, 83(3), 325–345. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00158-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzfeld, T., & Weiss, C. (2003). Corruption and legal (in)effectiveness: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 621–632. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00018-1
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 339–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42–50. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, R., & Best, M. L. (2006). Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. The Information Society, 22(1), 1–12. doi:10.1080/01972240500388149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 15(1), 222–279. doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, D., Loayza, N. V., & Soares, R. R. (2005). Accountability and corruption: Political institutions matter. Economics & Politics, 17(1), 1–35. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0343.2005.00145.x
   Google Scholar
• Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. doi:10.2307/2946696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1984). The new economics of organization. American Journal of Political Science, 28(4), 739–777. doi:10.2307/2110997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64–75. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. The American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427. doi:10.2307/1953254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D. E., & Gaebler, T. A. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Paldam, M. (2001). Corruption and religion adding to the economic model. Kyklos, 54(2–3), 383–413. doi:10.1111/1467-6435.00160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H. (2003). Determinants of corruption: A cross-national analysis. [Article]. Multinational Business Review (St. Louis University), 11(2), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, R. D., & Prasad, R. S. (2006). Role of e-governance in tackling corruption: The Indian experience. In R. Ahmad (Ed.), The role of public administration in building a harmonious society. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, T., Tabellini, G., & Trebbi, F. (2003). Electoral rules and corruption. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(4), 958–989. doi:10.1162/154247603322493203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four latin American countries. Journal of Politics, 64(2), 408–433. doi:10.1111/1468-2508.00132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126(1/2), 225–256. doi:10.2307/30026583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). E-government and anti-corruption: Empirical analysis of international data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298–316. doi:10.1080/01900690701590553
   Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., & Johnston, M. (2009). Does democracy check corruption? Insights from China and India. Comparative Politics, 42(1), 1–19. doi:10.2307/27822289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson, J. (2005). Eight questions about corruption. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3), 19–42. doi:10.2307/4134971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–55. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3878(00)00123-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354–369. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00594.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2013). Corruption perceptions index 2013. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results
   Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics, 76(3), 399–457. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration, & American Society for Public Administration. (2002). Benchmarking e-government: A global perspective. Retrieved from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan021547.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Xu, H. (2012). Information technology, public administration, and citizen participation: The impacts of e-government on political and administrative processes. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 915–920. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar