Functional Reforms in Italian Employment Policies: Institutional Impact at the Macro and Micro Level

REFERENCES

• Albonetti, R., & Violini, L. (2008). Il principio di sussidiarietà nel sistema lombardo di istruzione, formazione e lavoro: integrazione e innovazione. In A. Brugnoli & G. Vittadini (Eds.), La sussidiarietà in Lombardia. I soggetti, le esperienze, le policy. Milano, Italy: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• ARIFL (Agenzia Regionale per l’Istruzione la Formazione e il Lavoro). (2013). Modello di budget per operatore: La definizione delle soglie massime di spesa per operatore per la gestione della Dote Unica Lavoro’ Newsletter n. 04.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. (2005). The development of an evaluation framework for partnership working. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methodology, 3, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Backer, T. E. (2000). Innovation in context: New foundation approaches to evaluation, collaboration and best practices. Encino, CA: Human Interaction Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, W., & Le Grand, J. (1993). The theory of quasi-markets. In J. Le Grand & W. Bartlett (Eds.), Quasi-markets and social policy. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennmarker, H., Grönqvist, E., & Öckert, B. (2013). Effects of contracting out employment services: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98, 68–84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, S., & Wolff, J. (2008). Contracting out placement services in Germany: Is assignment to private providers effective for needy job-seekers?. IAB Discussion Paper, 5/2008.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., & Upchurch, M. (1999). Public sector employment. In G. Hollinshead, P. Nicholls, & S. Tailby (Eds.), Employee relations. London, UK: Financial Times Management.
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham, S. (1997). The contribution of interagency collaboration to the promotion of young people’s sexual health. Health Education Research, 12, 91–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredgaard, T., & Larsen, F. (2007). Implementing public employment policy: What happens when non-public agencies take over?. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(7), 287–300.
   Google Scholar
• Bredgaard, T., & Larsen, F. (2008). Quasi-markets in employment policy: Do they deliver on promises? Social Policy and Society, 7, 341–352.
   Google Scholar
• Bredgaard, T., Larsen, F., & Möller, L. R. (2005). Contracting-out the public employment service in Denmark: A quasi-market analysis. In T. Bredgaard & F. Larsen (Eds.), Employment policy from different angles. Copenhagen, Denmark: DJØF Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K. (2004). Human resource management in the public sector. Public Management Review, 6(3), 303–309.
   Google Scholar
• Brugnoli, A., & Vittadini, G. (2008). Sussidiarietà: antropologia positiva e organizzazione sociale. Fondamenti per una nuova concezione di Stato e mercato e punti cardine dell’esperienza lombarda. In A. Brugnoli & G. Vittadini (Eds.), La sussidiarietà in Lombardia. I soggetti, le esperienze, le policy. Milano, Italy: Guerini e Associati.
   Google Scholar
• Bruttel, O. (2005). Contracting-out and governance mechanisms in the public employment service. WZB Discussion Paper, 109/2005.
   Google Scholar
• Coda, V. (1984). La valutazione della formula imprenditoriale. Sviluppo & Organizzazione, 82, Marzo-Aprile.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, A. (2008). The ‘Lombardy Model’: Subsidiarity-informed regional governance. Social Policy & Administration, 42(2), 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M. (2001). Enterprising states. The public management of welfare-to-work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning, J. (2004). The reform of the Dutch public employment service. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University, SEOR.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, B., Powell, M., & Glendinning, C. (2004). Conceptualising successful partnerships. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12(4), 309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilbert, K., & Lafronza, V. (2005). Working together for community health – a model and case studies. Evaluation and Program Planning, 28, 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, D. (2008). Welfare markets’: Lessons from contracting out the delivery of welfare to work programmes in Australia and the Netherlands. York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating. Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Grubb, D. (2006). Australia’s quasi-market delivery of case management. International Social Security Association International Experts Workshop of the ISSA Technical Commission on Unemployment Insurance and Employment Maintenance Case Management to sustainable employment, Brussels, Belgium, 10–11 April, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hales, J., Taylor, R., Mandy, W., & Miller, M. (2003). Evaluation of employment zones: Report on a cohort survey of long-term unemployed people in the zones and a matched set of comparison areas. London, UK: National Centre for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hasluck, C., Elias, P., & Green, A. E. (2003). The wider labour market impacts of employment zones. Warwick, UK: Warwick Institute of Employment Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J., & Campbell, M. (1998). Working in partnership: Lessons from the literature. DfEE Research Report RR 63. London, UK: Department for Education and Employment.
   Google Scholar
• IReR (Istituto Regionale di Ricerca della Lombardia). (2010). Sperimentazione Valutatore Indipendente ai sensi dell’art. 17 della l.r. n. 22/06 e dell’art. 27 della l.r. 19/07 relativamente al biennio di attività 2008/2010. Valutazione delle performance degli operatori beneficiari della l.r. 22/06 e della l.r. 19/07, Vol. I, Final Report, November 2010.
   Google Scholar
• IstTer. (2007). Percorso di definizione del modello organizzativo di ARL/ARIFL, Progetto di realizzazione del servizio evolutivo del sistema direzionale D.D.G. n. 19639). Milano, Italy: Istituzioni & Territorio – Studio Associato.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, E. J., & Ochel, W. (2007). Contracting-out employment services: Temporary agency work in Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 125–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakabadse, A., & Kakabadse, N. (2001). Outsourcing in the public services: A comparative analysis of practice, capability and impact. Public Administration Development, 21, 401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (2003), Motivation, agency and public policy: Of knights and knaves, pawns and queens. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Skelcher, C. (1998). The dynamics of multi-organisational partnerships: An analysis of changing modes of governance. Public Administration, 76, 313–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundsgaard, J. (2002). Competition and efficiency in publicly funded services. OECD Economic Studies, 35(2), 79–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mabbett, D. (2009). Telling tales from abroad: Australia, the Netherlands and the welfare-to-work proposals in the UK. Benefits, 17(2), 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, L., & Cavenago, D. (2013). Redesigning welfare services for policies effectiveness. Public Management Review, 15(7), 1011–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, C., & Marston, G. (2008). Re-visiting the quasi-market in employment services: Australia’s job network. The Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30(2), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• McQuaid, R. W. (2000). The theory of partnerships – why have partnerships?. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Managing public–private partnerships for public services: An international perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, V. (2010). Innovation policy in Italy (1993–2002): Understanding the invention and persistence of a public management reform. Governance, 23, 251–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nativel, C., Sunley, P., & Martin, R. (2002). Localising welfare-to-work? Territorial flexibility and the New Deal for young people. Environment and Planning: Government and Policy, 20(6), 911–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Normann, R. (1984). Service management: Strategy and leadership in service businesses. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Obiettivo Lavoro. (2012). Obiettivo Lavoro Bilancio Sociale 2011. Retrieved from http://www.obiettivolavoro.it/content/il-bilancio-sociale
   Google Scholar
• Obiettivo Lavoro. (2013). Obiettivo Lavoro Bilancio Sociale 2012. Retrieved from http://www.obiettivolavoro.it/content/il-bilancio-sociale
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2001). Innovations in labour market policies – the Australian way. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). Italy: Better regulation to strengthen market dynamics. OECD Review of Regulatory Reform, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, J., Tyler, P., & Brennan, A. (2003). New developments in area-based initiatives in England: The experience of the SRB. Urban Studies, 40(8), 1399–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven, L. (2014). Varieties of market competition in public employment services – a comparison of the emergence and evolution of the new system in Australia, the Netherlands and Belgium. Social Policy & Administration, 48(2), 149–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struyven, L., & Steurs, G. (2004). Quasi-market reforms in employment and training services: First experiences and evaluation results. In P. Descy & M. Tessaring (Eds.), Evaluation of systems and programmes. Third report on vocational training research in Europe: Background report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (Cedefop Reference Series, 57).
   Google Scholar
• Trivellato, B. (2012). Politiche e modelli di governance dei servizi: l’Italia a confronto con altri casi internazionali. In M. Mezzanzanica (Ed.), Il mercato del lavoro negli anni della crisi. Dinamiche, occupabilità e servizi. Roma, Italy: Aracne.
   Google Scholar
• Trivellato, B., & Martini, M. (2011). Decentralising employment services at the regional level: The case of Lombardy in northern Italy. Paper presented at the 33rd EGPA Annual conference, September 7–10, 2011, Bucharest, Romania.
   Google Scholar