Managing Public Accountability: How Public Managers Manage Public Accountability

REFERENCES

• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2006). Delegating to the quango: ex ante and ex post ministerial constraints. Governance, 19, 229–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. A. P. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13, 447–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & Goodin, R. E. (2014). Public accountability. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public accountability (pp. 1–20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. A. P., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street-level bureaucracy to system-level bureaucracy: How ICT is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62, 174–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. (2010). Backstage Europe: Comitology, accountability and democracy in the European Union (PhD Thesis), Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2010). The accountability of European agencies: Legal provisions and ongoing practices. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, C., Flinders, M., & van Thiel, S. (1999). Quangos—what’s in a Name? Defining Quangos from a comparative perspective. Governance, 12, 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance measurement: A look at possible dysfunctions. Work Study, 51, 230–239.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G., & Travers, T. (1999). Regulation inside government: Waste-watchers, quality police, and sleazebusters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (1997). The global revolution in public management: Driving themes, missing links. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16, 446–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, D. E., Nalbandian, J., & Romzek, B. S. (2002). Politics, administration and markets: Conflicting expectations of accountability. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 117–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Administration Review, 65, 94–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, R. (2003). Holding power to account: Accountability in modern democracies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Ossege, C. (2012). Accountability–are we better off without it? An empirical study on the effects of accountability on public managers’ work behaviour. Public Management Review, 14, 585–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2006). The web of managerial accountability: The impact of reinventing government. Administration & Society, 38, 166–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. (2010). Accountability and multi-level governance: More accountability, less democracy? West European Politics, 33, 1030–1049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2003). The essential public manager. London, UK: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Romzek, B. S., & Dubnick, M. J. (1998). Accountability. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration: Volume 1, A-C. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schillemans, T., Brandsen, T., van Hout, E., & Oude Vrielink, M. (2008). Horizontale verantwoording bij maatschappelijke ondernemingen: Een verkenning in opdracht van het Platform Maatschappelijke Ondernemingen. Delft, The Netherlands: PMO.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20, 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2011). Lost in diffusion? How collaborative arrangements lead to an accountability paradox. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77, 505–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar