Government Mapping of the Third Sector: A Government Innovation for Regulation and Coordination? Perspectives From the Third Sector

REFERENCES

• Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (2006). Socios por Bogotá [Partners for Bogotá]. Retrieved from http://www.bogota.gov.co/…/Red_Distrital_de_Cooperaci_n_para_el_Desarrollo%5B1%5D.doc
   Google Scholar
• Alcaldía Mayor de Bogotá. (2010, March). Sistema de Información para la Cooperación (SICO) [The Information System for Cooperation – SICO] [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://www.sdp.gov.co/PortalSDP/SeguimientoPoliticas/politicaCooperacion/SICO
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H., Glasius, M., & Kaldor, M. (Eds.). (2001). Global civil society yearbook. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appe, S. (2011). Civil society mappings by government. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 157–178.
   Google Scholar
• Appe, S. (2012). What about who is mapping and its implications? Comments on Brent Never’s ‘the case for better maps of social service provision.’ Voluntas: Interantional Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organization, 23, 204–212.
   Google Scholar
• Bassi, A. (2010). Social innovation. Retrieved May 20, 2011, from http://www.esse.unibo.it/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Biekart, K. (2008). Measuring civil society strength. Development and Change, 39(6), 1171–1180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody, E. (2006). The legal framework for nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 243–266). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brysk, A. (2000). Democratizing civil society in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 11(3), 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairns, B., Harris, M., & Young, P. (2007). Building the capacity of the voluntary nonprofit sector: Challenges of theory and practice. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 9–10, 869–885.
   Google Scholar
• Coston, J. M. (1998). A model and typology of government-NGO relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 358–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decreto. (2010). Por medio del cual se adopta la Política Pública de Cooperación en el Distrito Capital y se dictan otras disposiciones. Retrieved December 30, 2010, from http://www.sdp.gov.co/portal/page/portal/PortalSDP/SeguimientoPoliticas/politicaCooperacion/Politica/Proyecto%20Decreto%20Politica%20Cooperacion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. (2010, August 12). Let’s hear those ideas. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.economist.com/node/16789766
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. (2008). Just another empire? Demos. Retrieved November 20, 2009, from http://www.futurepositive.org/emperor.php
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on nongovernmental organizations. World Development, 24(6), 961–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2005). On being nonprofit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frumkin, P. (2006). Book review: Civil society: Measurement, evaluation, policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 327–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadenius, A., & Uggla, F. (1998). Shaping civil society. In A. Bernard, H. Helmich, & P. Lehning (Eds.), Civil society and international development. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, V. (Ed.). (2007). CIVICUS global survey. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, V., & Fioramonti, L. (Eds.). (2008). CIVICUS global survey of the state of civil society. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. (2006). Peru: NGO bill threatens human rights. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2006/11/09/peru-ngo-bill-threatens-human-rights?print
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2006). Recent laws and legislative proposals to restrict civil society and civil society organizations. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 8(4), 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2009a). Global Trends in NGO Law, 1(1), 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2009b). Barred from the debate. Global Trends in NGO Law, 1(3), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. (2010). Wave of constraint. Global Trends in NGO Law: Special Edition, 2(2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Milofsky, C. (2000). Transparent research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, D. (2005). Public benefit status: A comparative overview. International Journal of Not-for-Profit Law, 7(3), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. In P. E. Auerswald & I. Z. Quadir (Eds.), Innovations. Technology, governance, globalizations. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Najam, A. (2000). The four-C’s of third sector-government relations: Cooperation, confrontation, complementarity, and co-option. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10(4), 375–96.
   Google Scholar
• National Endowment for Democracy (NED). (2008). Defending civil society: A report of the world movement for democracy. Washington, DC: World Movement for Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Never, B. (2011). The case for better maps of social service provision. Voluntas, 22(1), 174–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Open Society Institute. (2004). Guidelines for laws affecting civic organizations. New York, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Phills Jr., J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Roger, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rutzen, D., & Shea, C. (2006). The associational counter-revolution. Alliance, 4(3), 27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (1994). The rise of the nonprofit sector. Foreign Affairs, 74(3), 109–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2004). Global civil society. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2000). The influence of the legal environment on the development of the nonprofit sector. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1990). Policy for design for democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S. (1995). Inverting political economy: Perspective, position and discourse in the analysis of welfare. In Words of welfare: The poverty of social science and the social science of poverty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Secretaria de Pueblos, Movimientos Sociales y Participación Ciudadana. (2009). Registry manual. Retrieved from http://www.sociedadcivil.gov.ec/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=113&Itemid=153
   Google Scholar
• Short, C., & Wright, S. (1997). Policy: A new field of Anthropology. In C. Short & S. Wright (Eds.), Anthropology of policy (pp. 3–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning and political action. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Program. (2006). UNDP and civil society organizations. New York, NY: UNDP.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. & Krishna, A. (2004). Civil society and public sector institutions: More than a zero-sum relationship. Public Administration and Development, 24(4), 357–372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walzer, M. (1995). Toward a global civil society. Providence: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, D., Fung, A., Graham, M., & Fagotto, E. (2006). The effectiveness of regulatory disclosure policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 155–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. A. (2002). Public information. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 217–254). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a difference. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 15(2), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Wing, K. (2004). Assessing the effectiveness of capacity-building initiatives: Seven issues for the field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33, 153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2005). Issues and options for improving engagement between the World Bank and civil society organizations. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2007). Qualitative-interpretive methods in policy research. In F. Fisher, G. J. Miller, & M. S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 405–415). New York, NY: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar