Public Values in Context: A Longitudinal Analysis of the U.S. Civil Service

REFERENCES

• Adams, G. (1992). Enthralled with modernity: The historical context of knowledge and theory development in public administration. Public Administration Review, 52(4): 363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. B., Beck-Jørgensen, T. B., & Kjeldsen, A. M. (2012). Public value dimensions: Developing and testing a multi-dimensional classification. IJPA, 35, 715–728.
   Google Scholar
• Beck-Jørgensen, T. B., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values: An inventory. Administration & Society, 39, 354–381. doi:10.1177/0095399707300703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekke, H. A. G. M., & van der Meer, F. M. (2000). Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bengston, D. N., & Xu, Z. (2009). Changing national forest values. In K. Krippendorff (Ed.), The content analysis reader (pp. 283–294). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the New Public Management. Public Administration Review, 74, 445–456. doi:10.1111/puar.12238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimock, M. (1980). Law and Dynamic Administration. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, G. W., & Larkey, P. D. (1986). The search for government efficiency: From hubris to helplessness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duriau, V. J., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 5–34. doi:10.1177/1094428106289252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, W. (1972). Compassion. Oakville, Ontario: Canadian Peace Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Kabanoff, B., Waldersee, R., & Cohen, M. (1995). Espoused values and organizational change themes. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1075–1104. doi:10.2307/256621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernaghan, K. (2003). Integrating values into public service: The values statement as centerpiece. Public Administration Review, 63, 711–719. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluckhohn, C. K. (1951). Value and value orientations in the theory of action. In T. Parsons & E. B. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and recording of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28, 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, L. E. (2009). Restoring the rule of law to public administration: What Frank Goodnow got right and Leonard White didn’t. Public Administration Review, 69, 803–813. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melchior, M. & A. Melchior. (2001). A case for particularism in public administration. Administration & Society, 33, 251–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2009). “Our Usable Past”: A historical contextual approach to administrative values. Public Administration Review, 69, 813–822. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2014). History as a source of values for New Public Governance. In D. F. Morgan & B. J. Cook (Eds.), New public governance: A regime-centered perspective (pp. 55–66). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2012). Putting the “public” back in public values research: Designing participation to identify and respond to values. Public Administration Review, 72, 699–708. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rescher, N. (1969). Introduction to value theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1979). From individual to institutional values: With special reference to the values of science. In M. Rokeach (Ed.), Understanding human values: Individual and society (pp. 47–70). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separation of powers. Public Administration Review, 43, 219–227. doi:10.2307/976330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classifications in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30, 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Office of Personnel Management. (2003). Biography of an Ideal: A History of the Federal Civil Service. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., de Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86, 465–482. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• White, L. (1948). The Federalists: A Study in Administrative History. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. (1951). Value analysis: The nature and use of the method. Glen Gardner, NJ: Libertarian Press.
   Google Scholar