Functional Actorness? Border Security in the EU and Turkey

REFERENCES

• Bigo, D. (2001). The Möbius ribbon of internal and external security(ies). In M. Albert, D. Jacobson, & Y. Lapid (Eds.), Identities, borders, orders: Rethinking international relations theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. (2006). Internal and external aspects of security. European Security, 15(4), 385–404.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., & Guild, E. (Eds.). (2005). Controlling frontiers: Free movement into and within Europe. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2007). Migration control in Europe after 9/11: Explaining the absence of securitization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(3), 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, E. (2010). Extraterritorial migration control and human rights: Preserving the responsibility of the EU and its Member States. In B. Ryan & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Extraterritorial immigration control: Legal challenges. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Burgin, A. (2014). Strategic learning, limited Europeanization: How the Turkish national police used twinning to prepare itself for the new border agency. Turkish Studies, 15(3), 458–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, S. (2007). The EU border management strategy: FRONTEX and the challenges of irregular immigration in the Canary Islands (Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Working Document, No. 261/March 2007). Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Cmakalova, K., & Rolenc, J. M. (2012). Actorness and legitimacy of the European Union. Cooperation and Conflict, 47(2), 260–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson, S. (1996). Visa requirements, carrier sanction, ‘safe third countries’ and ‘readmission’: The development of an asylum ‘buffer zone’ in Europe. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 21(1), 76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2002, February). EU Schengen catalogue—External borders control, removal and readmission: Recommendations and best practices. General Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2011). Regulation (EU) No 1168/2011 of the European Parliament and of the council of 25 October 2011 amending council regulation (EC) No 2007/2004 establishing a European Agency for the management of operational cooperation at the external borders of the Member States of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304/1-17, 22.11.2011
   Google Scholar
• Crépeau, F. (2013, April 17). Report by the special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants, François Crépeau – Addendum – Mission to Turkey (25–29 June 2012) (Human Rights Council 23rd Session, A/HRC/23/46/Add.2). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants (SRHRM). Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Duman, O., & Tsarouhas, D. (2006). “Civilianization” in Greece versus “demilitarization” in Turkey—A comparative study of civil-military relations and the impact of the European Union. Armed Forces & Society, 32(3), 405–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2002, May 7). Towards integrated management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union (Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2002) 233 Final). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014a). EU research projects: SUNNY—Smart UNmanned aerial vehicle sensor network for detection of border crossing and illegal entrY (FP7-SECURITY: Project Reference: 313243). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014b, March 11). An open and secure Europe: Making it happen. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014c). Shaping the future of home affairs policies—The next phase. European Commission – Press Release. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-234_en.htm?locale=en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014d, October 8). Turkey 2014 progress report (Commission Staff Working Document) (Accompanying the Document ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2014-2015’ {COM(2014) 700 Final}, SWD(2014) 307 Final). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament & European Council. (2013, November 6). Regulation (EU) No. 1052/2013 establishing the European border surveillance system (Eurosur). Official Journal of the European Union, L 295(11).
   Google Scholar
• The European Union & The Republic of Turkey. (2014). AGREEMENT between the European Union and the Republic of Turkey on the readmission of persons residing without authorisation. Official Journal of the European Union, L 134/3.
   Google Scholar
• FRONTEX. (2005). Frontex agency budget 2005. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://frontex.europa.eu/about-frontex/governance-documents/
   Google Scholar
• FRONTEX. (2012a, May 28). Frontex signs a memorandum of understanding with Turkey. Retrieved September 12, 2012, from http://www.frontex.europa.eu/news/frontex-signs-a-memorandum-of-understanding-with-turkey-iY5Euj
   Google Scholar
• FRONTEX. (2012b). Third countries. Retrieved February 20, 2013, from http://www.frontex.europa.eu/partners/third-countries
   Google Scholar
• FRONTEX. (2014). Budget 2014. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://frontex.europa.eu/about-frontex/governance-documents/
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. (2005). Europe’s border relationships and international migration relations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 787–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., & Taylor, A. (2013). How EU capacity bargains strengthen states: Migration and border security in South-East Europe. West European Politics, 36(1), 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendijk, K., Guild, E., & Minderhoud, P. (Eds.). (2003). In search of Europe’s borders. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Guild, E., & Bigo, D. (2010). The transformation of European border controls. In B. Ryan & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Extraterritorial immigration control: Legal challenges. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Guild, E., & Carrera, S. (2013, November 14). EU borders and their controls: Preventing unwanted movement of people in Europe? (Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Essay, No. 6). Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V., & Lahav, G. (2000). A reappraisal of the state sovereignty debate: The case of migration control. Comparative Political Studies, 33, 163–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, C., & Jones, C. (2014). Eurosur: Saving lives or reinforcing deadly borders? Statewatch Journal,23(3/4), 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbing, P. (2005, August). Integrated border management at the EU level (Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) Working Document, No. 227). Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Icduygu, A. (2005). Transit migration in Turkey: Trends, patterns, and issues. European University Institute. Research Reports 2005/4. CARIM: Euro-Mediterranean Consortium for Applied Research on International Migration. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Icduygu, A., & Yukseker, D. (2012). Rethinking transit migration in Turkey: Reality and re-presentation in the creation of a migratory Phenomenon. Population, Space and Place, 18, 441–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J. (2008, August). Reinforcing the surveillance of EU border: The future development of FRONTEX and EUROSUR (The Changing Landscape of European Liberty and Security (CHALLENGE), Research Paper No. 11). Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J. (2011). Beyond the Tartar Steppe: EUROSUR and the ethics of European border control practices. In J. P. Burgess & S. Gutwirth (Eds.), A threat against Europe? Security, migration and integration. Brussels, Belgium: VUBPRESS Brussels University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. (2002). Justice and home affairs issues in Turkish–EU relations: Assessing Turkish asylum and immigration policy and practice. The Turkish Economic and Social Studies Foundation (TESEV). Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. (2003). Turkey: A transformation from emigration to immigration. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://www.migrationinformation.org/
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. (2007). Border management and EU–Turkish relations: Convergence or deadlock (Research Reports 2007/3 ed.). Research Reports 2007/3. European University Institute (EUI). Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. (2008). Managing irregular migration in Turkey: A political-bureaucratic perspective (CARIM Analytic and Synthetic Notes 2008/61). Florence, Italy: European University Institute (EUI).
   Google Scholar
• Kirisci, K. (2012). Turkey’s new draft law on asylum: What to make of it? In S. P. Elitok & T. Straubhaar (Eds.), Turkey, migration and the EU: Potentials, challenges and opportunities. Hamburg, Germany: Hamburg University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2004). EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2014). The power of functionalist extension: How EU rules travel. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(6), 885–903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. (2009). The creation of FRONTEX and the politics of institutionalisation in the EU external borders policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(3), 371–388.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, S. (2010). EU border security and migration into the European Union: FRONTEX and securitisation through practices. European Security, 19(2), 231–254.
   Google Scholar
• Lutterbeck, D. (2006). Policing migration in the mediterranean. Mediterranean Politics, 11(1), 59–82.
   Google Scholar
• Macmillan, C. (2009). The application of neofunctionalism to the enlargement process: The case of Turkey. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(4), 789–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2003). Justice and home affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(Annual Review), 119–135.
   Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2004). Justice and home affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(Annual Review), 117–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2006). Justice and home affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(Annual Review), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2009). Justice and home affairs. Journal of Common Market Studies,47(Annual Review), 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungianu, R. (2013). Frontex: Towards a common policy on external border control. European Journal of Migration and Law, 15(4), 359–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal, A. W. (2009). Securitization and risk at the EU border: The origins of FRONTEX. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 333–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. (1998). The PHARE programme and the concept of spillover: Neofunctionalism in the making. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3), 428–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. (2006). Explaining decisions in the European Union: Developing and examining a revised neofunctionalist framework. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Bretherton, C. (2013). EU external policy at the crossroads: The challenge of actorness and effectiveness. International Relations, 27(3), 261–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozden, S. (2013). Syrian refugees in Turkey (MPC Research Report 2013/05). Florence, Italy: European University Institute—Migration Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, J., & Riekmann, S. P. (2008). European administration: Centralisation and fragmentation a means of polity-building? West European Politics, 31(4), 771–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollak, J., & Slominski, P. (2009). Experimentalist but not accountable governance? The role of frontex in managing the EU’s external borders. West European Politics, 32(5), 904–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. (2010). Extraterritorial immigration control: What role for legal guarantees? In B. Ryan & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Extraterritorial immigration control: Legal challenges. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Saatcioglu, B. (2014). AKP’s ‘Europeanization’ in civilianization, rule of law and fundamental freedoms: The primacy of domestic politics. Journal of Balkan and near Eastern Studies, 16(1), 86–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, W., & Stone Sweet, A. (2012). Neo-functionalism and supranational governance. In E. Jones, A. Menon, & S. Weatherill (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of the European Union. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Satana, N. S. (2011). Civil-military relations in Europe, the Middle East and Turkey. Turkish Studies, 12(2), 279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1969). Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration. International Organization, 23(1), 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1970). A revised theory of regional integration. International Organization, 24(4), 836–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (2005). Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of neofunctionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 255–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert, D. (2013). Turkey’s integrated border management strategy. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 12(1), 173–179.
   Google Scholar
• Sterkx, S. (2008). The external dimension of EU asylum and migration policy: Expanding Fortress Europe? In J. Orbie (Ed.), Europe’s global role: External policies of the European Union. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stone Sweet, A., & Sandholtz, W. (1997). European integration and supranational governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 297–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temel, I. (2007). The border management issue in relation between Turkey and the EU (Masters thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Today’s Zaman. (2010). Gov’t vows to get draft on border management ready by late 2010. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://www.todayszaman.com/news-217303-govt-vows-to-get-draft-on-border-management-ready-by-late-2010.html
   Google Scholar
• Toktas, S., & Selimoglu, H. (2012). Smuggling and trafficking in Turkey: An analysis of EU-Turkey cooperation in combating transnational organized crime. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 14(1), 135–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in the light of the new dynamism of the EC. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 20(1), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2008). Border management in the mediterranean: Internal, external and ethical challenges. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(2), 253–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, C. F. (2012). Policy legacies, Visa reform and the resilience of immigration politics. West European Politics, 35(4), 726–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, J.-U. (2012). The EU an actor Sui Generis? A comparison of EU and ASEAN actorness? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(4), 653–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yavuz, E. (2009). Gov’t, military at odds over planned border security unit. Today’s Zaman. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://todayszaman.com/news-169147-govt-military-at-odds-over-planned-border-security-unit.html
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz, E. (2010a). Gov’t takes steps to establish special border patrol agency. Today’s Zaman. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://todayszaman.com/news-226566-govt-takes-steps-to-establish-special-border-patrol-agency.html
   Google Scholar
• Yavuz, E. (2010b). Military obstructs EU-backed border protection project. Today’s Zaman. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://www.todayszaman.com/news-210464-military-obstructs-eu-backed-border-protection-project.html
   Google Scholar