Managing Goal Commitment in Public Organizations: The Effects of Goal Conflict

References

• Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 1–14. doi:10.2307/2392596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Gates, S. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Erez, M., Earley, P. C., & Huhn, C. L. (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 50–66. doi:10.2307/256061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidson, E. (2001). Professionalism: The third logic: On the practice of knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, S., & Rohrbaugh, J. (2011). The role of psychological climate on public sector employees’ organizational commitment: An empirical assessment for three occupational groups. International Public Management Journal, 14, 27–62. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.547818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, H. J., Wesson, M. J., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Alge, B. J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 885–896. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.6.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P., Borgogni, L., & Pettita, L. (2008). Goal setting and performance management in the public sector. International Public Management Journal, 11, 385–403. doi:10.1080/10967490802491087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705–717. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. The Academy of Management Review, 13, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, E. A., Smith, K. G., Erez, M., Chan, D., & Schaffer, A. (1994). The effects of intra-individual goal conflict on performance. Journal of Management, 20, 67–91. doi:10.1177/014920639402000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 171–194. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, K. J. (1987). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: Toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299–326. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(00)00053-X
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20–52. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paarlberg, L. E., & Perry, J. E. (2007). Values management aligning employee values and organization goals. The American Review of public Administration, 37, 387–408. doi:10.1177/0275074006297238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panday, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2006). Connecting the dots in public management: Political environment, organizational goal ambiguity and the public manager’s role ambiguity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 511–532. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L., Mesch, D., & Paarlberg, L. (2006). Motivating employees in a new governance era: The performance paradigm revisited. Public Administration Review, 66, 505–514. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00611.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, L. W., Crampon, W. J., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organizational commitment and managerial turnover: A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 15, 87–98. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90030-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Ritz, A., Shantz, A., Alfes, K., & Arshoff, A. S. (2012). Who needs leaders the most? The interactive effect of leadership and core self-evaluations on commitment to change in the public sector. International Public Management Journal, 15, 160–185. doi:10.1080/10967494.2012.702588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J., & Dietrich, M. (1999). Conceptualizing professionalism: Why economics needs sociology. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 58, 977–998. doi:10.1111/ajes.1999.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stazyk, E. C., Panday, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Understanding affective organizational commitment: The importance of institutional context. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 603–624. doi:10.1177/0275074011398119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Children and Education. (2005). Styringsanalyse af uddannelsesområdets styringssystem. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Ministry of Children and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. What government agencies do and why they do it. New York, NY: BasicBooks.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-Sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 11, 559–586. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 59–78. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2007). Public service and motivation: Does mission matter? Public Administration Review, 67, 54–64. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar