Democratic Innovations to the Rescue? Political Trust and Attitudes Toward Democratic Innovations in Southwest Finland

References

• Barcikowski, R. S. (1981). Statistical power with group mean as the unit of analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6(3), 267–285. doi:10.2307/1164877
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Å., & Christensen, H. S. (2014). Ideals and actions: Do citizens’ patterns of political participation correspond to their conceptions of democracy? Government and Opposition, FirstView. doi:10.1017/gov.2014.29
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund, T. (2009). The surge of referendums and the new politics approach. In M. Setälä & T. Schiller (Eds.), Referendums and representative democracy: Responsiveness, accountability and deliberation (pp. 117–135). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, R. (2002). Engineering democracy. Political Studies, 50, 102–116. doi:10.1111/post.2002.50.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Karp, J. A. (2007). Enraged or engaged? Preferences for direct citizen participation in affluent democracies. Political Research Quarterly, 60(3), 351–362. doi:10.1177/1065912907304108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, B. E., Dalton, R. J., & Scarrow, S. E. (Eds.). (2003). Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The internet and democratic citizenship: Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., & Tufte, E. R. (1973). Size and democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices. The erosion of political support in advanced democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., Goldsmith, M., Ladner, A., Mouritzen, P. E., & Rose, L. E. (2014). Size and local democracy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., & Narud, H. M. (Eds.). (2013). Between election democracy – The representative relationship after election day. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fatke, M., & Freitag, M. (2013). Direct democracy: Protest catalyst or protest alternative? Political Behavior, 35(2), 237–260. doi:10.1007/s11109-012-9194-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, J., & Blanco, I. (2007). Procedural legitimacy and political trust: The case of citizen juries in Spain. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 557–589. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font, J., & Galais, C. (2011). The qualities of local participation: The explanatory role of ideology, external support and civil society as organizer. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35(5), 932–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2004). Empowered participation – Reinventing urban democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B. (2009). How to improve the quality of democracy? Experiences with participatory innovations at the local level in Germany. German Politics & Society, 27 (4), 51–71. doi:10.3167/gps.2009.270403
   Google Scholar
• Geissel, B., & Newton, K. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluating democratic innovations – Curing the democratic malaise? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grönlund, K., Setälä, M., & Herne, K. (2010). Deliberation and civic virtue: Lessons from a citizen deliberation experiment. European Political Science Review, 2, 95–117. doi:10.1017/S1755773909990245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. (2014). The democratic costs of size: How increasing size affects citizen satisfaction with local government. Political Studies. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. The American Political Science Review, 92, 791–808. doi:10.2307/2586304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, M., & Zmerli, S. (2011). Introduction: The context of political trust. In S. Zmerli & M. Hooghe (Eds.), Political trust – Why context matters (pp. 1–11). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis – Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. (2002). Municipal size and democracy: A critical analysis of the argument of proximity based on the case of Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 25, 317–332. doi:10.1111/scps.2002.25.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., & Serritzlew, S. (2011). Jurisdiction size and local democracy: Evidence on internal political efficacy from large-scale municipal reform. American Political Science Review, 105, 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2012). Social media and democracy – Innovations in participatory politics. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2006). Ruling the void? The hollowing of Western democracy. New Left Review, 42, 25–51.
   Google Scholar
• Marien, S., & Christensen, H. S. (2013). Trust and openness: Prerequisites for democratic engagement? In K. Demetriou (Ed.), Democracy in transition: Political participation in the European Union (pp. 109–134). London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A., & de Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (2012). Curing the democratic malaise with democratic innovations. In B. Geissel & K. Newton (Eds.), Evaluating democratic innovations – Curing the democratic malaise? (pp. 3–20). London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J. (2006). Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W. J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2009). MLwiN version 2.1. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-democracy – Politics in the age of distrust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saglie, J., & Vabo, S. I. (2009). Size and e-democracy: Online participation in Norwegian local politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(4), 382–401. doi:10.1111/scps.2009.32.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis – An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters – Making democracy work. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherford, M. S., & McDonnell, L. M. (2007). Deliberation with a purpose: Reconnecting communities and schools. In S. W. Rosenberg (Ed.), Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? (pp. 184–218). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• White, J., & Ypi, L. (2010). Rethinking the modern prince: Partisanship and the democratic ethos. Political Studies, 58(4), 809–828. doi:10.1111/post.2010.58.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T., & Fuchs, D. (Eds.). (2007). Participatory democracy and political participation – Can participatory engineering bring citizens back in? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S., & Hooghe, M. (Eds.). (2011). Political trust – Why context matters. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar