The EU and Multidimensional Forms of Power: Critical Moments and Change in Actorness and Power

REFERENCES

• Agence Europe, (1997, July 28). No. 7025.
   Google Scholar
• Agence Europe, (1999, July 30). No. 7518.
   Google Scholar
• Agence Europe, (2012, January 20). No. 10527.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. (2008). Introduction: Ethical power Europe? International Affairs, 84(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, T. (2011). The impact of EU law on minority rights. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1982). Civilian power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 21(2), 149–170. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.1982.tb00866.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, H. (1995). The anarchical society—A study of order in world politics. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984). The expansion of international society. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. D. B. (2010). Positions of responsibility: A comparison of ASEAN and EU approaches towards Myanmar. International Politics, 47(3–4), 433–449. doi:10.1057/ip.2010.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, P., & de Burca, G. (2011). EU law: Text, cases, and materials. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damro, C. (2012). Market power Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 19 (5), 682–699. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.646779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, B.(2008). Introduction: Exploring a central pillar of the European minority rights system. In L. De Witte & Verstichel (Eds.), The framework convention for the protection of national minorities: A useful pan-European instrument? Antwerp, Belgium: Intersentia.
   Google Scholar
• Diez, T., & Whitman, R. (2002). Analysing European integration: Reflecting on the English school. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 43–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doidge, M. (2011). The European Union and interregionalism: Patterns of engagement. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, F. (1972). Europe’s role in world peace. In R. Mayne (Ed.), Europea tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans look ahead. London, UK: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, T. (1995). The social construction of international society. European Journal of International Relations, 1(3), 367–389. doi:10.1177/1354066195001003003
   Google Scholar
• Egreteau, R. (2010). Intra-European bargaining and the “Tower of Babel” EU approach to the Burmese conundrum. East Asia, 27(1), 15–33. doi:10.1007/s12140-009-9088-x
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2003). Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament on article 7 of the treaty on European Union. Respect for and promotion of the values on which the Union is based. COM(2003) 606 final. Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1993). Presidency of the European council, presidency conclusions (pp. 21–22). Copenhagen, Denmark: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Union of European Nationalities. (2013, September 27). Now more than ever: Strong interest for the FUEN discussion meeting on the citizens’ initiative in the European Parliament. Flensburg, Germany: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Gaens, B. (2008). Europe–Asia interregional relations: A decade of ASEM. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gál, K., & Hicks, D. (2010). The European parliament intergroup for traditional minorities, national communities and languages, 2009–2014. Europäisches Journal Für Minderheitenfragen, 3(3–4), 236–250. doi:10.1007/s12241-010-0087-3
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (1996). Narrating crisis: The discursive construction of the winter of discontent. Sociology, 30(2), 253–277.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch Jovanovic, T. (2014). Reinventing national minority rights through European integration: From top-down to bottom-up Europeanisation ( Ph.D. dissertation). Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J., & Sasse, G. (2003). Monitoring the monitors: EU enlargement conditionality and minority protection in the CEECs. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe, 1, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrell, A. (1993). International society and the study of regimes: A reflective approach. In V. Ritterberg (Ed.), Regime theory and international relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A. (2006). “Normative” power Europe: A realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, M. (2003). “Do as I Say, Not as I Do”: The European Union, Eastern Europe and minority rights. East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, 17(4), 682–699. doi:10.1177/0888325403258291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, L. (2008). ASEAN’s albatross: ASEAN’s Burma policy, from constructive engagement to critical disengagement. Asian Security, 4(3), 271–293. doi:10.1080/14799850802306484
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2002). Power and weakness. Washington, DC: Hoover Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, T. (2010). Ethnic conflict in Burma: The challenge of unity in a divided country. In D. Lowell (Ed.), Burma or Myanmar? The struggle for national identity (pp. 51–81). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lerch, M., & Schwellnus, G. (2006). Normative by nature? The role of coherence in justifying the EU’s external human rights policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(2), 304–321. doi:10.1080/13501760500452665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006). The English school of international relations: A contemporary reassessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, H. (2008). Democracy and Human rights in the European-Asian dialogue: A clash of cooperation cultures? GIGA Working Paper. Hamburg, Germany: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. (2013). European international law. In Malloy (Ed.), Minority issues in Europe: Rights, concepts, policy. Berlin, Germany: Frank and Temme.
   Google Scholar
• Manners, I. (2002). Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 235–258. doi:10.1111/jcms.2002.40.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2003). The tragedy of great power politics. New York, NY: Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Narine, S. (2006). The English school and ASEAN. The Pacific Review, 19(2), 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navari, C. (2011). The concept of practice in the English school. European Journal of International Relations, 17(4), 611–630. doi:10.1177/1354066110368143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbie, J. (2008). A civilian power in the world? Instruments and objectives in European Union external policies. In J. Orbie (Ed.), Europe’s global role: External policies of the European Union (pp. 1–33). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, M. (2006). Myanmar in EU–ASEAN relations. Asia Europe Journal, 4 (4), 563–581.
   Google Scholar
• Portela, C. (2010). European Union sanctions and foreign policy: When and why do they work? London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, W. (1994, July 20). Asean undermines opposition to Burma junta. The Independence. Retrieved from Lexis-Nexis.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. (2004). Minority rights and EU enlargement: Normative overstretch or effective conditionality? In Toggenburg (Ed.), Minority protection and the enlarged European Union: The way forward. Budapest, Hungary: LGI Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schouenborg, L. (2012). The Scandinavian international society: Primary institutions and binding forces, 1815–2010. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. (2005). Beyond the civilian power EU debate. Politique Européenne, 17(3), 63–82. doi:10.3917/poeu.017.0063
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1994). Ethnic groups in Burma. London, UK: Anti-Slavery International.
   Google Scholar
• Stivachtis, Y. A., & Webber, M. (2011). Regional international society in a post-enlargement Europe. Journal of European Integration, 33(2), 101–116. doi:10.1080/07036337.2011.543519
   Google Scholar
• Toggenburg, G. (2004a). Bolzano declaration on the protection of minorities in the Enlarged European Union. Bolzano, Italy: European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano (EURAC).
   Google Scholar
• Toggenburg, G. (Ed.) (2004b). Minority protection and the enlarged European Union: The way forward. Budapest, Hungary: LGI Books.
   Google Scholar
• Toggenburg, G., & McLaughlin, K. (2011). The European Union and minorities in 2011. In European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano, Institute for minority rights and European Centre for Minority Issues (Ed.), European yearbook of minority issue 10. Leiden, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Toje, A. (2008). The European Union as a Small Power, or Conceptualizing Europe’s Strategic Actorness. Journal of European Integration, 30(2), 199–215.
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of, Maastricht (1992). Signed 7 February 1992, entered into force 1 November 1993. OJ C 191, 29.07.1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. (1999). Does the English school’s via media equal the contemporary constructivist middle ground? Presented at 24th Annual BISA Conference, Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, A. (2009). The evolution of international society: A comparative historical analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, M. (2008). Introduction: The Outlook for the Protection of Minorities in the Wider Europe. In B. Weller & Nobbs (Eds.), The Protection of minorities in the wider Europe. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. (2011). Normative power Europe: Empirical and theoretical perspectives. Basingtoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. (2009). The English school’s approach to international law. In C. Navari (Ed.), Theorising international society: English school methods (pp. 167–188). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, N. (2011). The European Union: What kind of international actor? Political Perspectives, 5(2), 8–32.
   Google Scholar