Worlds Apart? Worlds Aligned? The Perceptions and Prioritizations of Civil Servant Values Among Civil Servants From China and The Netherlands

REFERENCES

• Andersen, L. B., Jørgensen, T. B., Kjeldsen, A. M., Pedersen, L. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2012). Public value dimensions: developing and testing a multi-dimensional classification. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(11), 715–728. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.670843
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aufrecht, S. E., & Bun, L. S. (1995). Reform with Chinese characteristics: The context of Chinese civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 55, 175–182. doi:10.2307/977183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207–1220. doi:10.1177/0146167203254602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck Jørgensen, T., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values an inventory. Administration & Society, 39(3), 354–381. doi:10.1177/0095399707300703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., & Tortia, E. (2006). Worker motivations, job satisfaction, and loyalty in public and nonprofit social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(2), 225–248. doi:10.1177/0899764006287207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cherrington, D. J. (1989). Organizational behavior, The management of individual and organizational performance. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G. (2011). The loyalties of top public administrators. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(2), 285–306. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., & Huberts, L. W. (2008). Portraying the nature of corruption using an explorative case study design. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 640–653. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00904.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., & Van Der Wal, Z. (2008). On value differences experienced by sector switchers. Administration & Society, 40(1), 79–103. doi:10.1177/0095399707311785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, G., & Van der Wal, Z. (2010). Managing conflicting public values: Governing with integrity and effectiveness. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 623–630. doi:10.1177/0275074010375298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, B. R., & Nigro, L. G. (1996). Max Weber and US public administration: The administrator as neutral servant. Journal of Management History (Archive), 2(1), 37–46. doi:10.1108/13552529610105654
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. S. (2011). Contemporary trends and dilemmas of administrative ethics in the developing world. In M. S. De Vries & P. S. Kim (Eds.), Value and virtue in public administration: A comparative perspective (pp. 169–185). Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(02), 269–289. doi:10.1017/S1537592711000892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heald, D. (2006). Transparency as an instrumental value. In C. Hood, & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 59–73). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, K. M. (2013). Loyalty from a Confucian perspective. In S. Levinson, J. Parker & P. Woodruff (Eds.), Loyalty (pp. 22–37). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In C. Hood, & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 3–23). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, -K.-K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 163–183. doi:10.1111/ajsp.1999.2.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, D. (2008). Zhongguo Lishi shang de minbenwei weishenme meiyou chansheng minzhu zhengzhi? (Why democratic politics didn’t develop from Chinese traditional civilian-based thought?). Shehui Kexue (Journal of Social Sciences), 11, 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptein, M., Huberts, L., Avelino, S., & Lasthuizen, K. (2005). Demonstrating ethical leadership by measuring ethics: A survey of US public servants. Public Integrity, 7(4), 299–311.
   Google Scholar
• Kernaghan, K. (2000). The post-bureaucratic organization and public service values. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66(1), 91–104. doi:10.1177/0020852300661008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2005). The global public management revolution (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2011). “Wei renmin fuwu” de mingtishi kaocha (Study on the Proposition of “serve the people”). Makesi Zhuyi Yanjiu (Studies on Marxism), 7, 105–113.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, T., & Zhang, D. (2012). Lun Zhongguo Gongchandang minben sixiang dui chuantong minben sixiang de chuancheng he chaoyue (The continuation and surpassing of the people-oriented ideas in the Chinese tradition by the idea of people first of the CPC). Makesi Zhuyi Yanjiu (Studies on Maxism), 12, 104–109.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on government transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 3–9. doi:10.1177/0020852311435639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• O’Flynn, J. (2007). From new public management to public value: Paradigmatic change and managerial implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(3), 353–366. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1987). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch, U. (2008). Administrators and Accountability. The plurality of value systems in the public domain. Public Integrity, 10(4), 335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Petter, J. (2005). Responsible behavior in bureaucrats: An expanded conceptual framework. Public Integrity, 7(3), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J. (2007). Governmental transparency in the path of administrative reform. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piotrowski, S. J., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Citizen attitudes toward transparency in local government. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 306–323. doi:10.1177/0275074006296777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prat, A. (2006). The more closely we are watched, the better we behave? In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 91–103). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Redford, E. S. (1954). The protection of the public interest with special reference to administrative regulation. The American Political Science Review, 48(4), 1103–1113. doi:10.2307/1951013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York, NY: Free press.
   Google Scholar
• Rokeach, M. (1974). Change and stability in American value systems, 1968–1971. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38(2), 222–238. doi:10.1086/268153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2004). Comparative public administration: Navigating Scylla and Charybdis-Global comparison as a translation problem. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 26(2), 150–168.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2008). Sorting out public values? On the contingency of value classification in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 30(1), 92–113.
   Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R. (2014). As good as it gets? On the meaning of public value in the study of policy and management. The American Review of Public Administration. Advance online publication 21 March 2014. doi:10.1177/0275074014525833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutgers, M. R., & Van der Meer, H. (2010). The origins and restriction of efficiency in public administration regaining efficiency as the core value of public administration. Administration & Society, 42(7), 755–779. doi:10.1177/0095399710378990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45. doi:10.1111/josi.1994.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. H., Struch, N., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Values and intergroup social motives: A study of Israeli and German students. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(3), 185–198. doi:10.2307/2786958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasavage, D. (2006). Does transparency make a difference? The example of the European council of ministers. In C. Hood, & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 165–179). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, J. H. J., Huberts, L. W. J. C., & Verberk, S. (2002). Het morele gezicht van de overheid. Waarden normen en beleid [The moral face of government. Values, norms and policy]. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2011). The content and context of organizational ethics. Public Administration, 89(2), 644–660. doi:10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2013). Mandarins versus Machiavellians? On Differences between work motivations of administrative and political elites. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 749–759. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z. (2014). Elite ethics. comparing public values prioritization between administrative elites and political elites. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(14), 1030–1043. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.928319
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lasthuizen, K. (2008). What’s valued most? Similarities and differences between the organizational values of the public and private sector. Public Administration, 86(2), 465–482. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00719.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., De Graaf, G., & Lawton, A. (2011). Competing values in public management: Introduction to the symposium issue. Public Management Review, 13(3), 331–341. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.554098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Huberts, L. (2008). Value solidity in government and business: Results of an empirical study on public and private sector organizational values. The American Review of Public Administration, 38(3), 264–285. doi:10.1177/0275074007309154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Van Hout, E. T. J. (2009). Is public value pluralism paramount? The intrinsic multiplicity and hybridity of public values. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 220–231. doi:10.1080/01900690902732681
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wal, Z., & Yang, L. (2015). Confucius meets Weber or “Managerialism takes all”? comparing civil servant values in China and the Netherlands. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 411–436. doi:10.1080/10967494.2015.1030486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walder, A. G. (1988). Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1974). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Translated, edited and with an introduction by H. H Gerth and C. Wright Mills. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers. The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, B. (2002). Rujia chuantong ruhe zhiyuan xiandai minzhu? Dui hengtingdun wenti de yizhong jieda (How confucian tradition support modern democracy: An answer to the question raised by Huntington). Xueshu Yanjiu (Academic Research), 2002(5), 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L., & Van der Wal, Z. (2014). Rule of morality vs. rule of law? An exploratory survey study of civil servant values in China and the Netherlands. Public Integrity, 16(2), 187–206. doi:10.2753/PIN1099-9922160206
   Google Scholar
• Yao, X. (2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar