References
- Adamic, L., & Glance, N. (2005). The political blogosphere and the 2004US election: Divided they blog. In Proceedings of the third international workshop on Link discovery (pp. 36–43). New York, NY: ACM.
- Allingham, M. (2002). Choice theory: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
- Barbera, P. (2014). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. Retrieved from https://files.nyu.edu/pba220/public/barbera-polarization-social-media.pdf
- Black, D. (1958). The theory of committees and elections. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
- Buchanan, J. (1968). The demand and supply of public goods. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
- Buchanan, J., & Tullock, G. (1962). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014). Echo chamber or public sphere? Predicting political orientation and measuring political homophily in twitter using big data. Journal of Communication, 64 (2), 317–332. doi:10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-2
- Conover, M., Gonçalves, B., Flammini, F., & Menczer, F. (2012). Partisan asymmetries in online political activity. EPJ Data Science, 1 (1), 1–19. doi:10.1140/epjds6
- Farrell, H. (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 35–52. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815
- Francis, D. (2014). Ebola response becomes states’ Rights vs. Civil liberties. Retrieved from http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/10/31/ebola_response_becomes_states_rights_vs_civil_liberties_maine_quarantine
- Freeman, J. (1999). Efficiency and rationality in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 163–1975. doi:10.2307/2667036
- Gibson, C. (2014). Facts, Not Fear: Misguided quarantine policies have the potential to cause more damage than the Ebola virus itself. Retrieved February 10, 2015 from http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/opinion-blog/2014/10/31/cuomo-and-christie-responses-to-ebola-are-over-the-top
- Gilens, M., & Page, B. I. (2014). Testing theories of American politics: Elites, interest groups, and average Citizens. Perspectives on Politics, 12 (3), 564–581. doi:10.1017/S1537592714001595
- Hill, P. J. (1999). Public choice: A review. Faith & Economics, 34, 1–10.
- Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow Macmillan. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; Reprint edition.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. Boston, MA: Wiley Martin.
- Marwala, T. (2013). Flexibly-bounded Rationality and Marginalization of Irrationality Theories for Decision Making. arXiv:1306.20 [cs.AI]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1306/1306.2025.pdf
- McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q. (1967). The Medium is The Message: An Inventory of Effects. London, UK: Penguin Books.
- Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Pavel, L. (2012). Game theory for control of optimal networks, static and dynamic game theory: Foundation and application (pp. 11–26). doi:10.1007/978-0-8176-8322-1_2
- Putnam, L. L., & Mumby, D. K. (1993). Organizations, emotion and the myth of rationality. In S. Fineman, (Ed.), Emotion in organization (pp. 36–57). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Reed, M. (2007). Organizations and rationality: The odd couple. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1991.tb00768.x
- Shughart II, W. F. (2014). The concise encyclopedia of economics: Public choice. Retrieved from http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PublicChoice.html
- Spohn, W. (2002). The many facets of the theory of rationality. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, l (2), 247–262.
- Thompson, J. (1967). Organizations in action: Social bases of administrative theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.