EPSAS—Worrying the Wrong End of the Stick?

REFERENCES

• Adler, E., & Haas, P. M. (1992). Conclusion: Epistemic communities, world order, and the creation of a reflective research program. International Organization, 46(1), 367–390. doi:10.1017/S0020818300001533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2011). Why governments should use the government finance statistics accounting system. Abacus, 47(4), 411–445. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2002). The IPSAS approach: A useful tool for accounting reform, in Europe. In V. Montesinos & J. M. Vela (Eds.), Innovations in governmental accounting (pp. 85–97). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., & Condor, V. (2002). Towards the harmonization of local accounting systems in the international context. Financial Accountability and Management, 18(2), 129–162. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00148
   Google Scholar
• Cañibano, L., & Mora, A. (2000). Evaluating the statistical significance of de facto accounting harmonization: A study of European global players. European Accounting Review, 9(3), 349–369. doi:10.1080/09638180020017113
   Google Scholar
• Caperchione, E. (2000). Trends and open issues in governmental accounting systems: Some elements of comparison. In R. Jones (Ed.), Public sector accounting (Vol. 4, pp. 29–46). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, P. (1997). Advancing the harmonisation of international accounting standards: Exploring an alternative path. The International Journal of Accounting, 32(3), 357–378. doi:10.1016/S0020-7063(97)90016-9
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (1992). GAAP as a symbol of legitimacy: New York State’s decision to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 17(7), 613–643. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(92)90016-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, V. L., & Feroz, E. H. (2001). Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decisions to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 26, 565–596. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. L. (2006). IPSAS and government accounting reform in developing countries. In E. Lande & J. C. Scheid (Eds.), Accounting reform in the public sector: Mimicry, fad or necessity (pp. 31–41). Paris: Experts Comptables Media.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECA. (2012). Resolution CC-R-2012-02 on supreme audit institutions’ cooperation with Eurostat and National Statistical Institutions. Retrieved December 1, 2012 from http://eca.europa.eu/portal/pls/portal/docs/1/18138743.PDF
   Google Scholar
• EC Eurostat. (2012). Summary of responses—Public consultation—Assessment of the suitability of the IPSAS for the Member States. Retrieved December 29, 2012 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/D4_2012/EN/D4_2012-EN.PDF
   Google Scholar
• EC Eurostat. (2013a). Towards implementing harmonised public sector accounting standards in Member States (Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament COM(2013)114). Retrieved March 15, 2013 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EC Eurostat. (2013b). The suitability of IPSAS for the Member States (Commission Staff Working Document SWD(2013)57). Retrieved March 15, 2013 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EC Eurostat. (2013c). Document accompanying the public consultation “towards implementing European Public Sector Accounting Standards (EPSAS) for EU Member States—Public consultation on future EPSAS governance principles and structures” (Public Consultation Paper Dated November 25, 2013). Retrieved November 30, 2013 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EC Eurostat. (2014). Technical Press briefing on ESA2010 regulation. Brussels, January 16, 2014. Retrieved January 26, 2014 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• Emenyonu, E. N., & Gray, S. J. (1992). EC accounting harmonisation: An empirical study of measurement practices in France, Germany and the UK. Accounting and Business Research, 23(89), 49–58. doi:10.1080/00014788.1992.9729860
   Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young. (2013). Overview and comparison of public accounting and auditing practices in the 27 EU Member States. Retrieved March 15, 2013 from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• EU Council Directive 2011/85/EU, on requirements for budgetary frameworks of the Member States, L306/41, Official Journal of the EU.
   Google Scholar
• Fontes, A., Rodrigues, L. L., & Craig, R. (2005). Measuring convergence of national accounting standards with international financial reporting standards. Accounting Forum, 24(4), 415–438. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2005.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Heald, D., & Georgiou, G. (2011). The macro-fiscal role of the U.K. whole of government account. Abacus, 47(4), 446–476. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepworth, N. (2002). The European experience of and attitudes to the development of international accounting standards. In V. Montesinos & J. M. Vela (Eds.), Innovations in governmental accounting (pp. 73–83). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. (1994). Some reflections on ‘the harmonization of accounting within the EU’. European Accounting Review, 3(2), 241–254. doi:10.1080/09638189400000020
   Google Scholar
• IMF. (2012, August 7). Fiscal transparency, accountability, and risk. Prepared by the Fiscal Affairs Department in Collaboration with the Statistics Department. Retrieved November 1, 2012 from http://www.imf.org/external/index.htm
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2000a). National accounting, government budgeting and the accounting discipline. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(2), 101–116. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00099
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2000b). Public versus private: The empty definitions of national accounting. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(2), 167–178. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00103
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. (2014). Management of government within two different exogenous financial metrics: An unfamiliar context for research and teaching. In A. Bourmistrov & O. Olson (Eds.), Accounting, management control and institutional development (pp. 63–79). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., Lande, E., Lüder, K., & Portal, M. (2013). A comparison of budgeting and accounting reforms in the national governments of France, Germany, the UK, and the US. Financial Accountability and Management, 29(4), 419–441. doi:10.1111/faam.12022
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., & Pendlebury, M. (2010). Public sector accounting (6th ed.). Essex, England: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R., & Pallot, J. (1998). Trends, patterns and influencing factors: Some reflections. In O. Olson, J. Guthrie, & C. Humphrey (Eds.), Global warning: Debating international developments in new public financial management (pp. 376–399). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lüder, K. (2000). National accounting governmental accounting and cross-country comparisons of government financial condition. Financial Accountability and Management, 16(2), 117–128. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00100
   Google Scholar
• Lüder, K. (2002). Research in comparative governmental accounting over the last decade: Achievements and problems. In V. Montesinos & J. M. Vela (Eds.), Innovations in governmental accounting (pp. 1–21). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Makaronidis, A. (2012, December 13). DG Eurostat’s speaker. In ACCA’s 4th International Public Sector Conference: Rebalancing the economy—boosting growth, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• McCulloch, G., & Richardson, W. (2000). Historical research in educational settings. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. (1988). An historical-comparative perspective of governmental accounting. In J. L. Chan & R. H. Jones (Eds.), Governmental accounting and auditing: International comparisons (pp. 198–206). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2000). Comparative international accounting (6th ed.). London, UK: FT-Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic response to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, L. (2003). Using documents in social research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organisations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R., Ruef, M., Mendel, P. J., & Caronna, C. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organisations: From professional dominance to managed care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smulian, M. (2013). Whole of government accounts qualified again. Public Finance. Retrieved August 31, 2013 from http://www.publicfinance.co.uk/news/2013/07/whole-of-government-accounts-qualified-again/?utm_source=Adestra&utm_medium=email&utm_term=
   Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T. (2014). Accounting reforms, standard setting and compliance. In T. Budding, G. Grossi, & T. Tagesson (Eds.), Public sector accounting (pp. 8–22). Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tay, J. S. W., & Parker, R. H. (1990). Measuring international harmonization and standardization. Abacus, 26(1), 71–88. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.1990.tb00233.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar