Public-Sector Consolidated Financial Statements: An Analysis of the Comment Letters on IPSASB’s Exposure Draft No. 49

REFERENCES

• Anthony, R. N. (1983). Tell it like it was: A conceptual framework for financial accounting. Irwin, IL: Homewood.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, R. N. (2000). The fatal defect in the federal accounting system. Public Budgeting & Finance, 20(4), 1–10. doi:10.1111/0275-1100.00025
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. (2011). Why governments should use the government finance statistics accounting system. Abacus, 47(4), 411–445. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00347.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkaoui, R. A. (2004). Accounting theory. Singapore. Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann, A. (2009). Public sector financial management. Edinburgh Gate Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., Dietrich, M., & Laughlin, R. (1996). The development of principal-agent, contracting and accountability relationships in the public sector: Conceptual and cultural problems. Critical Perspectives in Accounting, 7(4), 259–284.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (1998). Resisting the new public management-absorption and absorbing groups in schools and GP practices in the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 11(4), 403–435.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), 565–586.
   Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2006). Are citizens significant users of government financial information? Public Money and Management, 26(4), 205–209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2009). International experiences in whole of government financial reporting: Lesson-drawing for Spain. Public Money & Management, 29(4), 234–250. doi:10.1080/09540960903035023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlin, T., & Guthrie, J. (2003). Accrual output based budgeting systems in Australia: The rhetoric-reality gap. Public Management Review, 5(2), 145–162. doi:10.1080/1461667032000066372
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, T. M. (2006). Victoria’s accrual output based budgeting system-delivering as promised? Some empirical evidence. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00390.x
   Google Scholar
• Challen, D., & Jeffery, C. (2005). Definition of the reporting entity. Australian Accounting Review, 15(1), 71–78. doi:10.1111/j.1835-2561.2005.tb00254.x
   Google Scholar
• Chan, J. L. (2003). Government accounting: An assessment of theory, purpose and standards. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 13–20. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, D., Humphrey, C., & Moll, J. (2007). Developing whole of government accounting in the UK: Grand claims, practical complexities and a suggested future research agenda. Financial Accountability and Management, 23(1), 27–54. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2007.00418.x
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J. (2002). Symposium on local government accounting reforms in Europe: Introduction. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 14(4), 560–564.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Doumpos, M., Neofytou, E., & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Assessing financial distress where bankruptcy is not an option: An alternative approach for local municipalities. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1), 270–279. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., Stapleton, P., & McLean, C. (2007). Discourse and institutional change: ‘Giving accounts’ and accountability. Management Accounting Research, 18(2), 150–171. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2007.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Farnham, D., & Horton, S. (1996). Managing public and private organizations. In D. Farnham & S. Horton (Eds.), Managing the new public services. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Governmental Accounting Standards Board. (1991). GASB 14. The financial reporting entity.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G. (2009). New development: Consolidated financial reporting as a stimulus for change in Italian local government. Public Money & Management, 29(4), 261–264. doi:10.1080/09540960903035056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., Bergmann, A., Rauskala, I., & Fuchs, S. (2013, May 16–17). Applying the equity method as a means of consolidation in the public sector: Experiences in OECD countries. Paper presented at EGPA Workshop of Public Sector Management and IPSAS, Salerno, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Newberry, S. (2009). Theme: Whole-of-government accounting: International trends. Public Money and Management, 29(4), 209–215. doi:10.1080/09540960903034968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Pepe, F. (2009). Consolidation in the public sector: A cross-country comparison. Public Money & Management, 29(4), 251–256. doi:10.1080/09540960903035031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Soverchia, M. (2011). European commission adoption of IPSAS to reform financial reporting. Abacus, 47(4), 525–552. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00353.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2014, May 8–9). Pursuing private accounting and accountability in the public sector: The case of municipal consolidation. Paper presented at EGPA Workshop: New Challenges for Public Sector Accounting, Lisboa.
   Google Scholar
• Grossi, G., & Tagesson, T. (2007). Consolidated financial reports in local government: A comparative analysis of IPSASB and SCMA (Working Paper Series Kristianstad University College). Retrieved February 15, 2014 from http://hkr.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:174914/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. (1998). Application of accrual accounting in the Australian public sector: Rhetoric or reality? Financial Accountability and Management, 14(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00047
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J., & Johnson, M. (1994). Commercialisation of the public sector: Why, how and for what? A prospective view. In K. Whiltshire (Ed.), Governance and economic efficiency (pp. 87–108). Sydney, Australia: Ceda.
   Google Scholar
• Heald, D., & Georgiou, G. (2000). Consolidation principles and practices for the U.K. government sector. Accounting and Business Research, 30(2), 153–167. doi:10.1080/00014788.2000.9728932
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board. (2012). IFRS 10. Consolidated financial statements. Retrieved November 10, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2013a). Exposure draft no. 48. Separate financial statements. Retrieved November 10, 2013 from https://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/IPSASBExposure-Draft-48-Separate-Financial-Statements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2013b). Exposure draft no. 49. Consolidated financial statements. Retrieved November 10, 2013 from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/IPSASB-Exposure-Draft-49-Consolidated-Financial-Statements.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2013c). Exposure draft no. 50. Investments in associates and joint ventures. Retrieved November 10, 2013 from http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/publications/files/IPSASB-Exposure-Draft-50-Investments-in-Associates-and-Joint-Ventures.pdf
   Google Scholar
• International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board (IPSASB). (2014). The conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities. Retrieved November 10, 2014 from http://www.ifac.org/publicationsresources/conceptual-framework-general-purpose-financialreportingpublic-sector-enti-8
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. H., & Pendlebury, M. (2004). A theory of the published accounts of local authorities. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(3), 305–325 doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00386.x
   Google Scholar
• Kam, V. (1990). Accounting theory. New York, NY: Wiley, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Kober, R., Lee, J., & Ng, J. (2010). Mind your accruals: Perceived usefulness of financial information in the Australian public sector under different accounting systems. Financial Accountability and Management, 26(3), 267–298. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2010.00502.x
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (1999). Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of substantive efficiency or a rationalising modernity? Financial Accountability and Management, 15(3/4), 201–207. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00081
   Google Scholar
• Ma, R., & Matthews, R. (1993, November). What’s wrong with ED 55. Financial Forum. Melbourne, Australia: ASCPA.
   Google Scholar
• Nasi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2008). Implementation of accounting reforms: An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Public Management Review, 10(2), 173–194. doi:10.1080/14719030801928573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, O., Humphrey, C., & Guthrie, J. (1998). International experiences with “New” Public Financial Management (NPFM) reforms: New world? Small world? Better world?”. In O. Olson, C. Humphrey, & J. Guthrie (Eds.), Global warning: Debating international developments in new public financial management (pp. 17–48). Oslo, Norway: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pallot, J. (1992). Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(1), 38–59. doi:10.1108/09513579210008244
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Summa, H. (1997). Trajectories of reform: Public management change in four countries. Public Money and Management, 17(1), 7–18. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb, A., & Newberry, S. (2007). Globalization: Governmental accounting and IFRSs. Socio-Economic Review, 5(4), 725–754. doi:10.1093/ser/mwm017
   Google Scholar
• Robè, J. P. (2011). The legal structure of the firm. Accounting, Economics, and Law—A Convivium, 1(1), 1–86. doi:10.2202/2152-2820.1001
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, P., Hughes, J. W., & Stanton, J. (1998). Australian-USA federal governmental accounting: Convergence or divergence? Financial Accountability & Management, 14(4), 249–264. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00064
   Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the annual report an accountability medium? An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Financial Accountability and Management, 20(3), 327–350. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00389.x
   Google Scholar
• Tagesson, T. (2009). Arguments for proportional consolidation: The case of the Swedish local government. Public Money and Management, 29(4), 215–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Bogt, H., & van Helden, G. J. (2000). Accounting change in Dutch government: Exploring the gap between expectations and realizations. Management Accounting Research, 11(2), 263–279. doi:10.1006/mare.2000.0132
   Google Scholar
• Viganò, E. (1965). L’entity concept nella dottrina contabile americana [The “entity concept” in the American accounting doctrine]. Napoli, Italy: Giannini.
   Google Scholar
• Viganò, E. (2012). Contenuto e finalità del bilancio [Content and purposes of financial statements]. Padova, Italy: Cedam.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. G. (2009). Public sector consolidated statements—An assessment. Abacus, 45(2), 171–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6281.2009.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, V. (2010). Theory and accountability: The case of government consolidated financial reporting. International Review of Business Research Papers, 6(5), 82–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, A. (2008). Accrual accounting for the public sector—A fad that has had its day? International Journal on Governmental Financial Management, 8(2), 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Yen, A. C., Hirst, D. E., & Hopkins, P. E. (2007). A content analysis of the comprehensive income exposure draft comment letters. Research in Accounting Regulation, 19, 53–79. doi:10.1016/S1052-0457(06)19003-7
   Google Scholar