In or Out: Developing a Categorization of Different Types of Co-Production by Using the Critical Case of Dutch Food Safety Services

References

• Alford, J. (1993). Towards a new public management model: Beyond ‘Managerialism’ and its critics. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 52(2), 135–148. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.1993.tb00263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients. From service-delivery to co-production. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Baars, T. (2011). Experiential science: Towards an integration of implicit and reflected practitioner-expert knowledge in the scientific development of organic farming. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 24(6), 601–628. doi:10.1007/s10806-010-9281-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: How users and communities contribute to public services. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 35–60). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public services. Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0047279414000567
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, D., & Harris, M. (2009). The challenge of co-production. How equal partnerships between professionals and the public are crucial to improving public services. London, UK: NESTA.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2014, May 20–21). Defining co-production more precisely: Positioning the concept in relation to volunteering and professionalism. Paper for the meeting of the IIAS Study Group on Co-Production of Public Services: Bergamo, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Pestoff, V., & Verschuere, B. (2012). Co-production as a maturing concept. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 1–9). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59–65. doi:10.2307/975300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewert, B., & Evers, A. (2012). Co-production: Contested meanings and challenges for user organizations. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 61–78). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freise, M. (2012). Co-producing safety or participative window dressing? Regulation partnerships in German local governance arrangements. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 264–280). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). A. Discovery of grounded theory. Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Inspectieloket. (2012). Systeemtoezicht en Horizontaal Toezicht: conceptleidraad voor de rijksinspecties. Retrieved May 2014 from http://www.inspectieloket.nl
   Google Scholar
• Inspectieloket. (2014). Programma Risicogestuurd Toezicht. Retrieved March 2014 from http://www.inspectieloket.nl
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. (2013). Co-production in Scotland: Two case studies. In E. Loeffler, G. Power, T. Bovaird, & F. Hine-Hughes (Eds.), Co-production of health and wellbeing in Scotland (pp. 46–51). Birmingham, UK: Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeffler, E., & Hine-Hughes, F. (2013). Five steps to making the transformation to co-production. In E. Loeffler, G. Power, T. Bovaird, & F. Hine-Hughes (Eds.), Co-production of health and wellbeing in Scotland (pp. 132–137). Birmingham, UK: Governance International.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2014). New media and the coproduction of safety: An empirical analysis of Dutch practices. American Review of Public Administration, 44(1), 17–34. doi:10.1177/0275074012455843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2015). What are third sector organisations and their benefits for commissioners? Retrieved April 2015 from http://www.nao.org.uk/successful-commissioning/introduction/what-are-civil-society-organisations-and-their-benefits-for-commissioners/#
   Google Scholar
• Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit (NVWA). (2014). Handhavingstrategie. Retrieved May 2014 from http://www.vwa.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Onderzoeksraad voor Veiligheid (OvV). (2014). Risico’s in de vleesketen. Den Haag, The Netherlands: Onderzoeksraad.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1976). The delivery of urban services. Outcomes of change. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V. … Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as co-producers of public services. Some institutional and economic considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1981.tb01208.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percy, S. L. (1978). Conceptualizing and measuring citizen co-production of community safety. Policy Studies Journal, 7(Winter), 486–493. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01797.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2008). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. In V. Pestoff & T. Brandsen (Eds.), Co-production. The third sector and the delivery of public services (pp. 11–29). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00384.x
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some crucial conceptual issues. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 13–34). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rijksoverheid [National Government]. (2011). Wat zijn de bevoegdheden van een cliëntenraad in een zorginstelling? Retrieved October 2011 from http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/goed-bestuur-in-de-zorg/vraag-enantwoord/wat-zijn-de-bevoegdheden-van-een-clientenraad-in-eenzorginstelling.html
   Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. P., Stenvall, J., Rannisto, P. H., Harisalo, R., & Hakari, K. (2014). Coordinating co-production in complex network settings. European Journal of Social Work, Online-first publication, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13691457.2014.930730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Land, M. (2014). De Buurtwacht: Naar een balans tussen instrumentalisering en autonomie van burgers in veiligheid. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2013). Waarom burgers coproducent willen zijn. Een theoretisch model om de motivaties van coproducerende burgers te verklaren. Bestuurskunde, 22(4), 72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analysing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2015a). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, online-first publication, 1–19. doi:10.1177/0020852314566007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C. J. A., & Steen, T. P. S. (2015b, 30 March – 1 April). ‘Why is this citizen layman entering my domain?!’ The effect of autonomy, organizational support, and red tape on openness towards co-production. Paper for the XIX IRSPM Conference (Panel D107): Birmingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Coproduction: State of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas, 23(4), 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review. on-line first publication. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar