Looking beyond the Simplistic Ideals of Participatory Projects: Fostering Effective Co-production?

References

• Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery: Managing with external providers. The public management & leadership series. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N. (2008). Turning around the poorest neighbourhoods: Learning the lessons from 20 years of neighbourhood-based regeneration strategies in England. Advances in Education in Diverse Communities: Research, Policy and Praxis, 8(12), 313–328. doi:10.1108/S1479-358X(2012)0000008017
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, N., & Pill, M. (2011). The continuing popularity of the neighbourhood and neighbourhood governance in the transition from the ‘big state’ to the ‘big society’ paradigm. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29, 927–942. doi:10.1068/c1133r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, S. 2011. The evolving governance of public services in England: Extending competition, choice, co-design and co-production. Innovations in Public Governance, 15, 69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2005). Public governance: Balancing stakeholder power in a network society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 217–228. doi:10.1177/0020852305053881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501. doi:10.1080/14719030601022874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannan, T., John, P., & Stoker, G. (2006). Active citizenship and effective public services and programmes: How can we know what really works? Urban Studies, 43(5–6), 993–1008. doi:10.1080/00420980600676626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S., & Pill, M. (2012). Empowerment or abandonment? Prospects for neighbourhood revitalization under the big society. Public Money & Management, 32(3), 193–200. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.676276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., & Lowndes, V. (2010). Neighbourhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting – a study of Manchester. Local Government Studies, 36(3), 341–359. doi:10.1080/03003931003730477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durose, C., Mangan, C., Needham, C., Rees, J., & Hilton, M. (2013). Transforming local services through co-production. A policy review. Birmingham University. Retrieved from http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-social-sciences/government-society/inlogov/briefing-papers/transforming-local-public-services-co-production.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, K., & Vogt, H. (2012). On self-service democracy: Configurations of individualizing governance and self-directed citizenship. European Journal of Social Theory, 20. doi:10.1177/1368431012459693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fledderus, J., Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2013). Restoring trust through the co-production of public services. A theoretical elaboration. Public Management Review, 16(3), 425–443. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.848920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2013). Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung /Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(2). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs130254
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., & Manzi, T. (2013). New localism, old retrenchment: The “big society”, housing policy and the politics of welfare reform. Housing, Theory and Society, 30(1), 29–45. doi:10.1080/14036096.2012.683293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T., & Ormston, C. (2014). Localism and accountability in a post-collaborative era: Where does it leave the community right to challenge? Local Government Studies, 40(1), 141–161. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.801834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jupp, V. (2006). Purposive sampling. The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London, UK: SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9780857020116
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, A., & Parkinson, M. (2001). The Significance of neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2103–2110. doi:10.1080/00420980120087063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorf, K. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2008). How low can you go? Rationales and challenges for neighbourhood governance. Public Administration, 86(1), 53–74. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00696.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, C., & Ludwig, G. (2014). Empty gestures? A review of the discourses of ‘localism’ from the practitioner’s perspective. Local Economy, 29(3), 245–256. doi:10.1177/0269094214528774
   Google Scholar
• Marschall, M. (2004). Citizen participation and the neighborhood context: A new look at the coproduction of local public goods. Political Research Quarterly, 57(2), 231–244. doi:10.1177/106591290405700205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNabb, D. E. (2002). Research methods in public administration and nonprofit management: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Michels, A., & De Graaf, L. (2010). Examining citizen participation: Local participatory policy making and democracy. Local Government Studies, 36(4), 477–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.494101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. A. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London, UK: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (1982). Is small really so beautiful? Is big really so ugly? Size, effectiveness, and democracy in local government. Political Studies, 30(2), 190–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Mahoney, J., & Vincent, S. (2014). Critical realism as an empirical project: A beginner’s guide. In J. P. K. Edwards, J. O’Mahoney, & S. Vincent (Eds.), Studying organizations using critical realism. A practical guide (pp. 1–20). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2009). Delivering public services: Time for a new theory? Public Management Review, 12(1), 1–10. doi:10.1080/14719030903495232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010). Introduction. The (new) public governance: A suitable case for treatment? In S. Osborne (Ed.), The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance (pp. 1–16). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S., & Strokosch, K. (2013). It takes two to tango? Understanding the co-production of public services by integrating the services management and public administration perspectives. British Journal of Management, 24, S31–47. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G., Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation study of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112. doi:10.1080/10967494.2013.796260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, J. L. (2007). Democracy and the new public service. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(1), 3–16. doi:10.1177/0275074006296091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas. International Society for Third Sector Research. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2014). Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Management Review, 16(3), 383–401. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.841460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Osborne, S., & Brandsen, T. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595. doi:10.1080/14719030601022999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdue, D. (2001). Neighbourhood governance: Leadership, trust and social capital. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2211–2224. doi:10.1080/00420980120087135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., Morenoff, J. D., & Gannon-Rowley, T. (2002). Assessing ‘neighborhood effects’: Social processer and new directions in research. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 443–478. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of ‘broken windows’. Social Psychology Quarterly, 67(4), 319–342. doi:10.1177/019027250406700401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. D. (2002). Assessing the relationship between police-community coproduction and neighborhood-level social capital. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 18(2), 147–166. doi:10.1177/1043986202018002003
   Google Scholar
• Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2005). What is local government for? Refocusing local governance to meet the challenges of the 21st Century. London, UK: NLGN.
   Google Scholar
• Tuurnas, S. (2015). Learning to Co-produce? The perspective of public service professionals. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 28(7), 583–598. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. (2015). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi:10.1177/0020852314566007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The State of the art in research and the future Agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal, I. (2006). Reflections on the market, networking and trust. Public Management Review, 8(4), 583–589. doi:10.1080/14719030601022973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., Goodwin, M., & Gloke, P. (2011). Neoliberalism, big society, and progressive localism. Environment and Planning A, 46, 2798–2815. doi:10.1068/a130119p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1993). Applications of case study research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar