Coproduction in Health Planning: Challenging the Need for “Open” Policy-Making Processes

References

• Abelson, J. A., & Gauvin, F.-P. (2006). Assessing the impacts of public participation: Concepts, evidence, and policy implications. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
   Google Scholar
• Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (1999). Managing in network settings. Review of Policy Research, 16(1), 18–41. doi:10.1111/ropr.1999.16.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., & Tatenhove, J. V. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the old and new policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3–4), 339–356. doi:10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy, participatory politics for a new age. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in Practice. Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the future.
   Google Scholar
• Boedeltje, M. (2009). Draagvlak door interactief bestuur: Fictie of feit? Enschede, The Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkers BV.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwen, R., & Taillieu, T. (2004). Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 14, 137–153. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornips J. (2008). Invloed en interactie: een onderzoek naar de relatie tussen instituties en invloed in lokale interactieve beleidsprocessen. Twente, The Netherlands: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• De Graaf, L. (2007). Gedragen beleid. Een bestuurskundig onderzoek naar interactief beleid en draagvlak in de stad Utrecht. Delft, The Netherlands: Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, S., & Klok, P.-J. (2003). Rebuilding Roombeek, an institutional analysis of interactive governance in the context of representative democracy. In B. Denters, et al. (Ed.), The rise of interactive governance and quasi-markets (pp. 91–110). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. (2000). Proces in vorm. Procesbegeleiding van interactieve beleidsvorming over lokale ruimtelijke projecten. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2005). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making. A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 417–446. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 15(2), 226–243. doi:10.1177/016224399001500204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2000). The deliberative practitioner. Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goverde H. J. M., & Lako, C. J. (2005). Hoe innovatief is interactieve beleidsvorming? Bestuurswetenschappen, 59, 530–550.
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W., & Hoppe, R. (2004). Science/Policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In S. Maase, & P. Weingart (Eds.), Scientific expertise and political decision-making. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy. Policy cycles & policy subsystems. Ontario, Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. (1997). Managing networks in the public sector: Findings and reflections. In W. J. M. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn, & J. Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing complex networks. Strategies for the public sector (pp. 166–191). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., Pratchett, L., & Stoker, G. (2001). Trends in public participation: Part 2. Citizen’s perspectives. Public Administration, 79(2), 445–455. doi:10.1111/padm.2001.79.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnikhof, R., Edelenbos J., & Krouwel A. (2003). Interactieve beleidsvorming. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, L. J. (1988). Strategies for intergovernmental management: Implementing programs in interorganizational networks. International Journal of Public Administration, 11(4), 417–441. doi:10.1080/01900698808524596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: the University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., & Warin, P. (2007). Are innovative, participatory and deliberative procedures in policy making democratic and effective? European Journal of Political Research, 46(4), 445–472. doi:10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partners+Pröpper. (2008). Inspraak Nieuwe Stijl beproefd. Onderzoek naar de toepassing en resultaten van Inspraak Nieuwe Stijl. Vught, The Netherlands: Raad van Toezicht van het Inspraakpunt Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat.
   Google Scholar
• Pröpper, I., & Steenbeek, D. (1999). De aanpak van interactief beleid: Elke situatie is anders. Bussum, The Netherlands: Coutinho.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruelle, H., & Bartels, G. (1998). Draagvlak en de wisselwerking tussen zender en ontvanger. In G. Bartels, W. Nelissen, & H. Ruelle (Eds.), De transactionele overheid. Communicatie als instrument: Zes thema’s in de overheidsvoorlichting (pp. 403–409). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Bedrijfsinformatie.
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., & Pennington, M. (2000). Public participation and local environmental planning: The collective action problem and the potential of social capital. Local Environment, 5, 153–169. doi:10.1080/13549830050009328
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. doi:10.1111/padm.2009.87.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J. 2012, Interactief beleid. Een analyse van organisatie en resultaten van interactieve planning in twee Vlaamse ‘hot spots’. Proefschrift., Faculteit Sociale Wetenschappen.
   Google Scholar
• Van Damme, J., & Brans, M. (2012). Managing public consultation: A conceptual framework and empirical findings from Belgian case studies. Public Administration, 90(4), 1047–1066. doi:10.1111/padm.2012.90.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar