Co-Production in a Network Setting: Providing an Alternative to the National Probation Service

References

• Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Development, 32(3), 447–463. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2003.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahven, A., Kruusement, A., & Salla, J. (2013) Tingimisi vabastamise ja käitumiskontrolli kohaldamise analüüs. Kriminaalpoliitika analüüs, 3/2013. Tallinn, Estonia: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery. Managing with external providers. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 7−27. doi:10.1177/0011128705281756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Brewer, G. A. (2013). Social capital, management capacity and public service performance: Evidence from the US states. Public Management Review, 15(1), 19–42. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.662445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, D. G. (1993). Values and volunteering. In J. D. Smith (Ed.), Volunteering in Europe (pp. 10–31). London, England: Voluntary Action Research, Second Series, No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. J. J. M., Tummers, L. G., & Voorberg, W. H. (2013). From public innovation to social innovation in the public sector: A literature review of relevant drivers and barriers. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Van Hout, E. (2006). Co-management in public service networks: The organisational effects. Public Management Review, 8(4), 537–549. doi:10.1080/14719030601022908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CASS. (2014). Homelessness amongst those in the criminal justice system. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from http://www.cass-cumbria.co.uk/homelessness-amongst-those-criminal-justice-system
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, J., Mackie, A., Prestage, Y., & Wood, M. (2013). Results from the Offender Management Community Cohort Study (OMCCS): Assessment and sentence planning. Matrix Evidence and NatCen Social Research, Ministry of Justice Analytical Series. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/309959/results-omccs.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chui, W. H., & Cheng, K. K. Y. (2013). Effects of volunteering experiences and motivations on attitudes toward prisoners: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Criminology, 8(2), 103–114. doi:10.1007/s11417-012-9148-9
   Google Scholar
• Clancy, A., Hudson, K., Maguire, M., Peake, R., Raynor, P., Vanstone, M., & Kynch, J. (Eds.) (2006). Getting out and staying out: Results of the prisoner resettlement pathfinders. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, H. A., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). Innovations in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Ottawa, Canada: IRSPM.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall, S. (2002). Rethinking what works with offenders: Probation, social context and desistance from crime. Cullompton, England: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Farrall, S. (2004). Social capital and offender reintegration: Making probation desistance focused. In S. Maruna, & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 57–84). Devon, England: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin, K. (2003). A choice blend: What volunteers want from organization and management. London, England: Institute for Volunteering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, H., & White, R. (2014). Innovative justice. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, F., Cnaan, R. A., Hustinx, L., Kang, C., Brudney, J. L., Haski-Leventhal, D., … Zrinscak, S. (2010). A cross-cultural examination of student volunteering: Is it all about résumé building? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(3), 498–523. doi:10.1177/0899764009344353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, J. S., & Jacobs, J. B. (2007). Ban the box to promote ex-offender employment. Criminology and Public Policy, 6(4), 755–762. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2007.00470.x
   Google Scholar
• Home Office. (2001). British crime survey 2000 England and Wales. London, England: Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., Scott, C., James, O., Jones, G., & Travers, T. (2002). Regulation inside government. Waste-watchers, quality police, and sleaze-busters (reprinted). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. (2013). Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4), 31–49. doi:10.1080/00220380410001673184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler, P., & Andreasen, A. R. (1996). Strategic marketing for non-profit organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kütt, M., & Surva, L. (2014). Vanglast vabanenute tugiisikusüsteemi eesmärgipärasuse kontrolli aruanne (Evaluation of the mentoring service 2013). Tallinn, Estonia: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, C. (2007). Social enterprise and social innovation: Strategies for the next ten years. A social enterprise think piece for the office of the third sector. London, England: Cabinet Office/OTS.
   Google Scholar
• Lelieveldt, H., Dekker, K., Voelker, B., & Torenvlied, R. (2009). Civic organizations as political actors mapping and predicting the involvement of civic organizations in neighborhood problem-solving and coproduction. Urban Affairs Review, 45(1), 3–24. doi:10.1177/1078087409332303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lember, V. (2004). Limiting aspects of contracting out in transitional countries: The case of Estonian prisons. Public Administration and Development, 24(5), 425–435. doi:10.1002/pad.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leone, R. P., Walker, C. A., Curry, L. C., & Agee, E. J. (2012). Application of a marketing concept to patient-centered care: Co-producing health with heart failure patients. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 17, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Machin, J., & Paine, A. E. (2008). Management matters: A national survey of volunteer management capacity. London, England: Institute for Volunteering Research.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., & Nolan, J. (2007). Accommodation and related services for ex-prisoners. In A. Hucklesby & L. Hagley-Dickinson (Eds.), Prisoner resettlement: Policy and practice (pp. 144–173). Devon, England: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F. (2012). Four forms of ‘offender’ rehabilitation: Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 17(1), 18–36. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02039.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Measham, T. G., & Barnett, G. B. (2007). Environmental volunteering: Motivations, modes and outcomes. Australian Geographer, 39(4), 537–552. doi:10.1080/00049180802419237.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598–607. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, G., Ender, J., Mänd, K., & Surva, L. (2008). Vabatahtlikus tegevuses osalemine Eestis. Uuringuaruanne. Versioon 4. Tallinn, Estonia: Vabatahtliku Tegevuse Arenduskeskus.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., & Carr, S. (2009). Co-production: An emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. London, England: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panet, P. D. L., & Trebilcock, M. J. (1998). Contracting-out social services. Canadian Public Administration, 41(1), 21–50. doi:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1998.tb01526.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519. doi:10.1080/14719030601022882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas, 23(4), 1102–1118. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Osborne, S. P., & Brandsen, T. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services: Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595. doi:10.1080/14719030601022999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, D. (2012). Coproduction and network structures in public education. In V. Pestoff, T. Brandsen, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), New public governance, the third sector and co-production (pp. 145–168). New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Randma-Liiv, T., & Kruusenberg, R. (2012). Policy transfer in immature policy environments: Motives, scope, role models and agents. Public Administration and Development, 32(2), 154–166. doi:10.1002/pad.1609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochester. (2006). Making sense of volunteering. A literature review. London, England: Volunteering England.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. (2012). Co-production: Option or obligation? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(3), 314–324. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00780.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler-Rainman, E., & Lippitt, R. (1977). The volunteer community: creative use of human resources (2nd ed.). La Jolla, CA: University Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, M. (2006). The recurring cycle: Pathways of homelessness, crime and imprisonment. Prison Service Journal, 166, 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Shumilov, R. (2008). Stigmatiseerimise mõju kriminaalhooldusalustele ja sellega kaasnevad tööhõiveprobleemid. Tallinn, Estonia: Estonian Academy of Security Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. doi:10.1177/0095399711418768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Dabney, D. (2004). Prison volunteers: Profiles, motivations, satisfaction. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40(1–2), 173–183. doi:10.1300/J076v40n01_09
   Google Scholar
• Uggen, C., Manza, J., & Behrens, A. (2004). Less than the average citizen: Stigma, role transition, and the civic reintegration of convicted felons. In S. Maruna & R. Immarigeon (Eds.), After crime and punishment: Pathways to offender reintegration (pp. 258–290). Devon, England: Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J. (2014). Integration and control: The governing of urban marginality in Western Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(4), 1418–1436. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Ministry of Justice. (2014). Transforming rehabilitation: A summary of evidence on reducing reoffending (2nd ed.). London, England: Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.
   Google Scholar
• Üprus, A., Surva, L., & Miller, I. (2010). Diakooniline sekkumisstrateegia: Vanglast vabanenute tugivõrgustiku kujundamine. I etapp: tugiisikusüsteemi loomine Virumaal Viru vangla ja usuliste ühenduste koostöös. Esimene vahearuanne. Tallinn, Estonia: Ministry of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Vancopponolle, D., & Verschuere, B. (2011). Failure in service delivery by public-private networks: The case of Flemish childcare. Public Policy and Administration, 27(1), 31–48. doi:10.1177/0952076710384904
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). Co-creation in social innovation: A comparative case-study on the influential factors and outcomes of co-creation. Ottowa, Canada: IRSPM.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., Melser, J., & Yates, P. M. (2007). Reconstructing the risk–need–responsivity model: A theoretical elaboration and evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12, 208–228. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, B., & McNeill, F. (2007). Giving up crime: Directions for policy. The Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2006.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 240–246. doi:10.2307/975377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K., Poyser, J., & Hopkins, K. (2012). Accommodation, homelessness and reoffending of prisoners: Results from the Surveying Prisoner Crime Reduction (SPCR) survey. Ministry of Justice Research Summary 3/12. Retrieved April 30, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/accommodation-homelessness-and-reoffending-of-prisoners
   Google Scholar