Are School Committees a Source of Empowerment? Insights from Tanzania

References

• Allen, I. E., & Seaman, C. A. (2007). Likert scales and data analyses. Quality Progress, 40(7), 64, URL http://search.proquest.com/docview/214764202?accountid=8579
   Google Scholar
• Alsop, R., Bertelsen, M. F. & Holland, J. (2006). Empowerment in practice: From analysis to implementation. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Askvik, S. (2005). Running a school on its own is too much: Why principals trust and distrust school governing bodies. In S. Askvik & N. Bak (Eds.), Trust in public institutions in South Africa (pp. 197–210). Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Borges, A. (2007). From patronage politics to community deliberation: The recent experience of democratic school management in Brazil. Public Administration and Development, 27(4), 273–282, doi 10.1002/pad.464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brannstrom, C. (2004). Decentralising water resource management in Brazil. The European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 214–234, doi: 10.1080/09578810410001688815
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M. (2001). Community partnerships in education: Dimensions, variations and implications. Paris, France: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283, doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Essuman, A., & Akyeampong, K. (2011). Decentralisation policy and practice in Ghana: The promise and reality of community participation in education in rural communities. Journal of Education Policy, 26(4), 513–527, doi: 10.1080/02680939.2011.554999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankfort-Nachmias, C. & Nachimias, D. (1992). Research methods in the social sciences. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: Recipes for public spheres: Eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 338–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., & McGee, R. (2013). The impact of transparency and accountability initiatives. Development Policy Review, 31(s1), s3–s28, doi: 10.1111/dpr.12017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyden, G. (2012). African politics in comparative perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20, doi: 10.1177/1525822X05282260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosack, S., & Fung, A. (2014). Does transparency improve governance? Annual review of political science, 17, 65–87, doi: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-032210-144356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, E. S., Posner, D. N., & Tsai, L. L. (2014). Does information lead to more active citizenship? Evidence from an education intervention in rural Kenya. World Development, 60, 69–83, doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafora, P. (2013). When devolved power is re-centralised: The adulteration of deliberative democracy in school governing bodies. The Social Science Journal, 34(2), 97–104.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2004). User committees: a potentially damaging second wave of decentralisation? The European Journal of Development Research, 16(1), 192–213, doi 10.1080/09578810410001688806
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (2011). Perspectives on decentralization. Documento de discussão, (3), Swedish ICLD internet source, http://www.icld.se/pdf/ICLD_wp3_printerfriendly.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Masue, O. S. (2010). Empowerment of and effectiveness of school committees in Tanzania (MPhil thesis). University of Bergen, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Masue, O. S. (2014). Empowerment of school committees and parents in Tanzania (PhD dissertation), University of Bergen, Bergen.
   Google Scholar
• Mbwambo, L., Eid, T., Malimbwi, R. E., Zahabu, E., Kajembe, G. C., & Luoga, E. (2012). Impact of decentralised forest management on forest resource conditions in Tanzania. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 21(2), 97–113, doi: 10.1080/14728028.2012.698583
   Google Scholar
• Moore, M. (2001). Empowerment at last? Journal of International Development, 13(3), 321–329, doi 10.1002/jid.787
   Google Scholar
• Narayan-Parker, D. (2005). Measuring empowerment: Cross-disciplinary perspectives: Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Prinsen, G., & Titeca, K. (2008). Uganda’s decentralised primary education: Musical chairs and inverted elite capture in school management committees. Public Administration and Development, 28(2), 149–164, doi: 10.1002/pad.487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, M. A., Vieira, Z. M., & Ribeiro, M. M. (2012). Participatory and decentralized water resources management: Challenges and perspectives for the North Paraíba River Basin committee―Brazil. Water Science and Technology, 66(9), 2007–2013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaoka, Y., & Nishimura, M. (2010). Does universal primary education policy weaken decentralisation? Participation and accountability frameworks in East Africa. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 40(1), 79–95, doi: 10.1080/03057920902913875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shayo, E. H., Norheim, O. F., Mboera, L. E., Byskov, J., Maluka, S., Kamuzora, P., & Blystad, A. (2012). Challenges to fair decision-making processes in the context of health care services: A qualitative assessment from Tanzania. International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(1), 30, URL: http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/30
   Google Scholar
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Springate-Baginski, O., Sarin, M., & Reddy, M. G. (2013). Resisting rights: Forest bureaucracy and the tenure transition in India. Small-scale Forestry, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, I. (2002). The notion of participation in primary education in Uganda: Democracy in school governance. Paper presented at the Learning Democracy and Citizenship: International Experiences. Oxford, England: Symposium Books.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, J., & Björkman, M. (2009). Power to the people: Evidence from a randomized field experiment of a community-based monitoring project in Uganda. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(2), 735–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (2005). Analytical considerations of ‘power’ as the basis and the goal of ‘empowerment’. Cross-disciplinary perspectives. Washington, DC. Electronic source: URL: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2012/NormanUphoffPower.pdf
   Google Scholar
• URT. (1995). Education and training policy. Dar es Salaam, Tz: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• URT. (2001). Basic Education Master Plan. Dar es Salaam, Tz: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, S. (2014). Determinants of ‘community participation’: The tradition of local initiatives and the institutionalisation of school management committees in Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(2), 162–185, doi: 10.1080/03057925.2012.746899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar