363
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Social Capital, Civic Engagement, and Economics in a Transitioning Economy: The Case of Vietnam Provinces

&

References

  • Bae, K.-H. (2004). The process of enhancing social capital in the city of Los Angeles. International Review of Public Administration, 9(2), 121–138.
  • Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. New York City, NY: Columbia University Press for the National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Besser, T. J. (2009). Changes in small town social capital and civic engagement. Journal of Rural Studies, 25(2), 185–193.
  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. The American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
  • Carpenter, J. P., Daniere, A. G., & Takahashi, L. M. (2004). Cooperation, trust, and social capital in Southeast Asian urban slums. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(4), 533–551.
  • CECODES, VFF-CRT & UNDP (2013). The Viet Nam Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI) 2012: Measuring Citizens’ Experiences. 2012 PAPI Questionnaire. A Joint Policy Research Paper by Centre for Community Support and Development Studies (CECODES), Centre for Research and Training of the Viet Nam Fatherland Front (VFF-CRT), and United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Ha Noi, Viet Nam. [Obtained from UNDP]
  • Coffe, H., & Geys, B. (2005). Institutional performance and social capital: An application to the local government level. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27(5), 485–501.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(supplement), s95–s120.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Dalton, R. J., Hac, P. M., Nghi, P. T., & Ong, N. T. (2002). Social relations and social capital in Vietnam: The 2001 world values survey. Comparative Sociology, 1(3), 369–386.
  • Etzioni, A. (1996). A moderate communitarian proposal. Political Theory, 24(2), 155–171.
  • Fukuyama, F. (2001). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.
  • General Statistical Office of Vietnam. (2012a) Vietnam Statistical Yearbook. Province population. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=13541
  • General Statistical Office of Vietnam. (2012b) Vietnam Statistical Yearbook. Province monthly income per capita. Retrieved from https://www.gso.gov.vn/default_en.aspx?tabid=515&idmid=5&ItemID=13541
  • Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Review of Richard Florida’s The rise of the creative class. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35(5), 593–596.
  • Glewwe, P., Agrawal, N., & Dollar, D. (Eds.). (2004). Economic growth, poverty, and household welfare in Vietnam. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Hoyman, M., & Faricy, C. (2009). 2009. It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories. Urban Affairs Review, 44(3), 311–333.
  • Iyer, S., Kitson, M., & Toh, B. (2005). Social capital, economic growth and regional development. Regional Studies, 39(8), 1015–1040.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The life and death of great American cities. New York, NY: Random House Publishing.
  • Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288.
  • Larsen, R. K. (2011). Reinvesting rural development in Vietnam: Discursive constructions of grassroots democracy during the renovation reform. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 52(3), 316–332.
  • Lowery, D., & Lyons, E. W. (1989). The impact of jurisdictional boundaries: An individual-level test of the Tiebout model. Journal of Politics, 51, 73–79.
  • Lowery, D., Lyons, E. W., & DeHood, H. R. (1992). Institutionally inducted attribution errors: Their composition and impact on citizen satisfaction with local government services. American Politics Quarterly, 18(2), 169–196.
  • Luong, H. V. (2003). Economic growth and governances transformation in Vietnam. Department of Geography and Planning Working paper. Toronto, Ontario: University of Toronto.
  • Malecki, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039.
  • Malesky, E. J. (2004). Entrepreneurs on the periphery: A study of private sector development beyond the high performing cities and provinces of Vietnam. (Private Sector Discussion Paper No. 18). Hanoi, Vietnam: Mekong Project Development Facility, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Moser, C. (1996). Confronting Crisis: A comparative study of household responses to poverty and vulnerability in four poor urban communities. Environmentally Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series 8. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
  • Narayan, D. (1995). The Contribution of People’s Participation: Evidence from 121 Rural Water Supply Projects. Environmentally Sustainable Development Occasional Paper Series No. 1. The World Bank, Washington, DC.
  • Narayan, D., & Pritcheet, L. (2000). Social capital: Evidence and implications. In P. Dasgupta, & I. Serageldin (Eds), Social capital: A multi-faceted perspective (pp. 269–295). Washington, DC: World Bank.
  • Newman, C., Tarp, F., & Van Den Broeck, K. (2014). Social capital, network effects, and savings in rural Vietnam. Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 79–99.
  • Nguyen, P. Q. T., Bui, T. A., & Han, M. T. (2001). Doing business under the new enterprise law: A survey of newly registered companies. (Private Sector Discussion Paper No. 12). Mekong Project Development Facility, Hanoi Vietnam.
  • Nguyen, T. H., Le, C. Q., Tran, B. T., & Bryant, S. E. (2015). Citizen participation in city governance: Experiences from Vietnam. Public Administration and Development, 35(1), 34–35.
  • Nguyen-Hoang, P., & Schroeder, L. (2010). An analysis of quasi-decentralized budgeting in Vietnam. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(12–13), 689–709.
  • Norlund, I. (2003). Social capital or social capitalism: Diversification of the Vietnamese rural scenery. Paper presented to the International Conference “Moderisation and Social Transformation in Vietnam: Social Capital Formation and Institution Building”. Munich Institute for Social Sciences and Hanoi Institute of Socio-economic Development Studies, Hanoi, Vietnam.
  • Oliver, J. E. (2000). City size and civic involvement in metropolitan America. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 361–373.
  • Painter, M. (2003). Public administration reform in Vietnam: Problems and prospects. Public Administration and Development, 23(3), 259–271.
  • Pink-Harper, S. A. (2011). Social capital: A catalyst for local communities economic growth. Public Knowledge Journal, 2(2).
  • Putnam, R. (1993a). Making democracy work: Civic tradition in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Putnam, R. (1993b). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13(supplement), s35–s42.
  • Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Ronnas, P. (1998). The transformation of the private manufacturing sector in Vietnam in the 1990s. (Working Paper Series in Economic and Finance No. 241). Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Ronnas, P., & Ramamurthy, B. (Eds.). (2001). Entrepreneurship in Vietnam. Transformations and dynamics. Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Institute of Asian Studies; and Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  • Ross, B. H., & Levine, M. A. (2001). Urban politics: Power in Metropolitan America. Itasca, Illinois: F.E. Peacock Publishers, Inc.
  • Shimane, K. (2013). Social capital in Vietnam: On the basis of survey reports on urban and rural areas. The Senshu Social Capital Review: Exploring Social Capital Towards Sustainable Development in East Asia, 4, 143–159.
  • Sites, W. (1998). Communitarian theory and community development in the United States. Community Development Journal, 33(1), 57–65.
  • Sorensen, J. F. L. (2012). Testing the hypothesis of higher social capital in rural areas: The case of Denmark. Regional Studies, 46(7), 873–891.
  • Steer, L., & Taussig, M. (2002). A little engine that could…: Domestic private companies and Vietnam’s pressing need for wage employment. (Policy Research Working Paper No. 2873). World Bank Vietnam, August.
  • Svendsen, G. L. H., & Sorensen, J. F. L. (2007). There’s more to the picture than meets the eye: Measuring tangible and intangible capital in two marginal communities in rural Denmark. Journal of Rural Studies, 23(4), 453–471.
  • Turner, S., & Nguyen, P. A. (2005). Young entrepreneurs, social capital and doi moi in Hanoi, Vietnam. Urban Studies, 42(10), 1693–1710.
  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • Vietnam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index. Measuring citizens’ experiences. Retrieved from: http://papi.vn/en/about-papi.html
  • Vietnam Provincial Governance and Public Administration Performance Index (PAPI) 2012. Retrieved from http://www.vn.undp.org/content/vietnam/en/home/library/democratic_governance/PAPI-2012.html
  • Vo, X. H., & Baumgarte, R. (2000). Economic reform, private sector development and the business environment in Vietnam. Comparative Economic Studies, 42(3), 1–30.
  • Wang, X. (2001). Assessing public participation in U.S. cities. Public Performance and Management Review, 24(4), 322–336.
  • Whiteley, P. F. (2000). Economic growth and social capital. Political Studies, 48(3), 443–466.
  • Woodhouse, A. (2006). Social capital and economic development in regional Australia: A case study. Journal of Rural Studies, 22(1), 83–94.
  • Woodlock, M., & Narayan, D. (2000). Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Research Observer, 15(2), 225–249.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.