Implementing Risk Management in the Italian Public Sector: Hybridization between Old and New Practices

References

• Arena, M., Arnaboldi, M., & Azzone, G. (2010). The organizational dynamics of enterprise risk management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35, 659–675. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, A. A., & Webb, A. (2005). A directors guide to risk and its management. International Federation of Accountants Articles of Merit Award Program for Distinguished Contribution to Management Accounting, August, p. 26.
   Google Scholar
• Barberis, P. (1998). The new public management and a new accountability. Public Administration, 76, 451–470. doi:10.1111/padm.1998.76.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, A., Loughton, E., & Otley, D. (1991). Control in a financial services company (RIF): A case study. Management Accounting Research, 2, 109–139. doi:10.1016/S1044-5005(91)70030-9
   Google Scholar
• Bhimani, A. (2009). Risk management, corporate governance and management accounting: Emerging interdependencies. Management Accounting Research, 20, 2–5. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggart, N. W., & Beamish, T. D. (2003). The economic sociology of conventions: Habit, custom, practice, and routine in market order. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 443–464. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.29.010202.100051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2005). The emergence of risk-based regulation and the new public risk management in the United Kingdom. Public Law, 3, 512–548.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2008). Risk-based regulation: Choices, practices and lessons being learned. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, R., Epstein, D., & Latimer, J. (2009). Accounting for ethos or programmes for conduct? The brave new world of research ethics committees. The Sociological Review, 57, 727–749. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Cornforth, C., Farrell., C., Gnan, G., Hinna, A., & Monteduro, F. (2013). Studies in public and non-profit governance: Conceptualizing and researching governance in public and non-profit organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Quirk, B. (2013). Reducing public risk and improving public resilience: An agenda for risk enablement strategies. In C. Staite (Ed), Making sense of the future: Do we need a new model of public services? Birmingham, UK: INLOGOV.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, W. W. (2002). Organization change: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Calogero, M. (2010). The introduction of New Public Management principles in the Italian public sector. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 30, 30–54.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. J. (2006). Tools and techniques for enterprise risk management. London, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• COSO. (2004). Enterprise risk management. Retrieved from http://www.coso.org/Publications/%20ERM/COSO_ERM_%20ExecutiveSummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Courpasson, D., & Reed, M. (2004). Introduction: Bureaucracy in the age of enterprise. Organization, 11, 5–12. doi:10.1177/1350508404039656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decastri, M. (2005). Amministrazione pubblica e stereotipi. Alla ricerca della burocrazia perduta. In M. Decastri, L. Hinna, M. Meneguzzo, & R. Mussari (Eds.), Economia delle aziende pubbliche (pp. 331–380). Milano, Italy: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E., & Pollitt, C. (2005). The oxford handbook of public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gephart, R. P., Van Maanen, J., & Oberlechner, T. (2009). Organizations and risk in late modernity. Organization Studies, 30, 141–155. doi:10.1177/0170840608101474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., Hinna, A., & Scarozza, D. (2013). Leading organizational changes in public sector. Building blocks in understanding boards behaviour. In T. Bovaird, C. Cornforth, C. Farrell, G. Gnan, A. Hinna, & F. Monteduro (Eds.), Studies in public and non-profit governance: Conceptualizing and researching governance in public and non-profit organizations (pp. 57–89). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A. W. (1954). Patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, G. (2007, September). Strategic risk is the main threat to shareholder value but too many firms are still failing to grasp this nettle. Financial Management, September, 2007, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2008). Handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, S. (2001). A primer on risk management in the public service. University of Calgary: A background document for CCMD’s Action-Research Roundtable on Risk Management. Calgary, Canada: Government of Canada Publications.
   Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. (2004). The orange book: Management of risk – principles and concepts. Retrieved from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/3/5/FE66035B-BCDC-D4B3-11057A7707D2521F.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Government at work: Best practices and model programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1998). The art of the state: Culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2002). The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37, 15–37. doi:10.1111/goop.2002.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Jackson, M. (1991). Administrative argument. Aldershot, UK: Dartmouth.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., James, O., Peters, B. G., & Scott, C. (2004). Controlling modern government. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, O. E. (2003). Public management and administration: An introduction. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, F. (2015). New public management (NPM): A dominating paradigm in public sectors. African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 9, 141–152. doi:10.5897/AJPSIR2015.0775
   Google Scholar
• Kalimullah, N. A. K., Alam, M., Ashraf, N., & Ashaduzzaman, M. M. (2012). New public management: Emergence and principles. BUP Journal, 1, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kolisovas, D., & Škarnulis, A. (2011). Risk management in Lithuania’s public sector: Starting point, current situation and future perspectives. Intellectual Economics, 5, 547–559.
   Google Scholar
• Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I. (2009). New public management: The cruellest invention of the human spirit? Abacus, 45, 1–21. doi:10.1111/abac.2009.45.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, F., & Isaacs, F. (2008). Risk management in public sector research: Approach and lessons learned at a national research organization. R&D Management, 38, 510–519. doi:10.1111/radm.2008.38.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M. (2008). Institutional rationality and practice variation: New directions in the institutional analysis of practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 349–361. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012. doi:10.1177/0170840607078111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, J. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, M. W. (2005). Measuring the payoffs of strategic risk management. CMA Management, 79, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• McGoun, E. G. (1995). The history of risk measurement. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6, 511–532. doi:10.1006/cpac.1995.1047
   Google Scholar
• McPhee, I. (2005, September). Risk and risk management in the public sector. Keynote Address to the Public Sector Risk and Governance Forum. Australia: Australian National Audit Office.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1949). Social theory and social structure. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, M. W., Stevenson, W., & Webster, S. (1985). Limits to bureaucratic growth. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. D. (2009). Organizational risk after modernism. Organization Studies, 30, 157–180. doi:10.1177/0170840608101475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., Kurunmäki, L., & O’Leary, T. (2008). Accounting, hybrids and the management of risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 942–967. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2007.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 173–205. doi:10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Pandey, S. K. (2010). The big question for performance management: Why do managers use performance information? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 849–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrman, A., & Jansson, U. (2004). Ericsson’s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34, 434–456.
   Google Scholar
• Otley, D. T., & Berry, A. J. (1994). Case study research in management accounting and control. Management Accounting Research, 5, 45–65. doi:10.1006/mare.1994.1004
   Google Scholar
• Peccia, T. (2001). Designing an operational risk framework from a bottom-up perspective. In Mastering risk volume 2: Applications. London, UK: Pearson Education Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, N., Lawrence, T. B., & Hardy, C. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29, 635–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., Pasha, O. Q., & Edwards, L. H. (2013). Does performance management lead to better outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. public transit industry. Public Administration Review, 73, 625–636. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the Neo–Weberian State. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2004). The risk management of everything. London, UK: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2007). Organized uncertainty designing a world of risk management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34, 849–855. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao, Y. (2007). Public risk management: Development and financing. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 19, 33–56.
   Google Scholar
• Scapens, B., & Bromwich, M. (2009). Editorial: Risk management, corporate governance and management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 20, 1. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13, 25–35. doi:10.2307/2086752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., & Davies, A. (2005). Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: New public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organization Studies, 26, 683–706. doi:10.1177/0170840605051821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vann, J. L. (2004). Resistance to change and the language of public organizations: A look at “Clashing Grammars” in large-scale information technology projects. Public Organization Review, 4, 47–73. doi:10.1023/B:PORJ.0000015651.06417.e1
   Google Scholar
• Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Meiri, S. (2008). New public management values and person-organization fit: A socio psychological approach and empirical examination among public sector personnel. Public Administration, 86, 111–131. doi:10.1111/padm.2008.86.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, M. (2009). A contingency theory perspective on the risk management control system within Birmingham City Council. Management Accounting Research, 20, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2008.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 559–586. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a003515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. E. (2004). The role of work context in work motivation: A public sector application of goal and social cognitive theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14, 59–78. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research–design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar