789
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Toward a Pragmatic Model of Public Responsiveness: Implications for Enhancing Public Administrators’ Responsiveness to Citizen Demands

References

  • Adams, G. B., Bowerman, P. V., Dolbeare, K. M., & Stivers, C. (1990). Joining purpose to practice: A democratic identity for the public service. In H. D. Kass, & B. L. Catron (Eds.), Images and identities in public administration (pp. 219–240). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Agranoff, R. (2005). Managing collaborative performance: Changing the boundaries of the State? Public Performance & Management Review, 29(1), 18–45.
  • Alkadry, M. G. (2003). Deliberative discourse between citizens and administrators: If citizens talk, will administrators listen? Administration & Society, 35(2), 184–209. doi:10.1177/0095399703035002004
  • Barry, B. (1967). The public interest. In A. Quinton (ed.), Political philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swider, A., & Tipton, S. (1991). The good society. New York, NY: Knopf.
  • Box, R. C. (1992). The administrator as trustee of the public interest: Normative ideals and daily practice. Administration & Society, 24(3), 323–345. doi:10.1177/009539979202400303
  • Box, R. C. (1998). Citizen governance: Leading American communities into the 21st century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Bozeman, B. (2007). Public values and public interest. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
  • Bryer, T. A. (2007). Toward a relevant agenda for a responsive public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(3), 479–500. doi:10.1093/jopart/mul010
  • Bryer, T. A. (2009). Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions. Public Administration Review, 69(2), 271–283. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-2
  • Cassinelli, C. W. (1958). Some reflections on the concept of the public interest. Ethics, 69(1), 48–61. doi:10.1086/291189
  • Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democracy theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 307–326. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
  • Chaney, C. K., & Saltzstein, G. H. (1998). Democratic control and bureaucratic responsiveness: The police and domestic violence. American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 745–768. doi:10.2307/2991728
  • Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), 141–142.
  • Cooper, T. L., Bryer, T. A., & Meek, J. W. (2006). Citizen-centered collaborative public management. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 76–88.
  • Crompton, J. L. (1983). Recreation vouchers: A case study in administrative innovation and citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 43(6), 537–546. doi:10.2307/975921
  • Delli Carpini, M. X., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 315–344. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
  • Demir, T. (2011). Professionalism, responsiveness, and representation: What do they mean for city managers? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(3), 151–158. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.533066
  • Denhardt, J., & Denhardt, R. (2007). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Denhardt, R. B. (2008). Theories of public organization (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Wadsworth.
  • Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Holt.
  • Dubnick, M. J. (2005). Accountability and the promise of performance: In search of the mechanisms. Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), 276–417.
  • Ebdon, C., & Franklin, A. (2006). Citizen participation in budgeting theory. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 437–447. doi:10.1111/puar.2006.66.issue-3
  • Farazmand, A. (1997). Professionalism, bureaucracy, and modern governance: A comparative analysis. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern systems of government: Exploring the role of bureaucrats and politicians (pp. 48–73). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Festenstein, M. (1997). Pragmatism and political theory: From Dewey to Rorty. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fox, C. J., & Cochran, C. E. (1990). Discretion advocacy in public administration theory: Toward a Platonic guardian class? Administration & Society, 22, 249–271. doi:10.1177/009539979002200206
  • Frederickson, H. G. (1991). Toward a theory of the public for public administration. Administration and Society, 22(4), 395–417.
  • Fried, R. (1976). Performance in American bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
  • Gastil, J. (2000). By popular demand: Revitalizing representative democracy through deliberative elections. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Gawthrop, L. C. (1998). Public service and democracy: Ethical imperatives for the 21st century. New York, NY: Chatham House Publishers.
  • Hall, J. (2002). Reconsidering the connection between capacity and governance. Public Organization Review, 2(1), 23–43. doi:10.1023/A:1016071303640
  • Herring, E. P. (1936). Public administration and the public interest. New York and London: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.
  • Ho, A. T. (2006). Accounting for the value of performance measurement from the perspectives of city mayors. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(2): 363–393.
  • Hummel, R. P. (1987). The Bureaucratic experience (3rd ed.). New York, NY: St Martin’s Press.
  • Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004). Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Administration Review, 64(1), 55–65. doi:10.1111/puar.2004.64.issue-1
  • Jaskyte, K. (2011). Predictors of administrative and technology innovations in nonprofit organizations. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 77–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02308.x
  • Kearney, R. C., & Sinha, C. (1988). Professionalism and bureaucratic responsiveness: Conflict or compatibility? Public Administration Review, 48(1), 571–579. doi:10.2307/975521
  • Kumar, S., Kant, S., & Amburgey, T. L. (2007). Public agencies and collaborative management approaches: Examining resistance among administrative professionals. Administration & Society, 39(5), 569–610. doi:10.1177/0095399707303635
  • Loveridge, R. O. (1971). City managers in legislative politics. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Manring, N. J. (1994). ADR and administrative responsiveness: Challenges for public administrators. Public Administration Review, 54(2), 1–18. doi:10.2307/976530
  • Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). A democratic polity?: Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30(6), 630–667. doi:10.1177/153267302237231
  • Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Moynihan, D. P. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, D.C. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164–188. doi:10.1177/0275074003251379
  • Nalbandian, J. (1999). Facilitating community, enabling democracy: New roles for local government managers. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 187–197. doi:10.2307/3109948
  • Nalbandian, J. (1991). Professionalism in local government: Transformations in the roles, responsibilities, and values of city managers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
  • Potoski, M. (1999). Managing uncertainty through bureaucratic design: Administrative procedures and state air pollution control agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9(4), 623–640. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024425
  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2001). Do networks really work? A Framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423. doi:10.1111/puar.2001.61.issue-4
  • Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Roberts, N. (1997). Public deliberation: An alternative approach to crafting policy and setting direction. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 124–132. doi:10.2307/977060
  • Romzek, B., & Dubnick, M. J. (1987). Accountability in the public sector: Lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Administration Review, 47(3), 227–238. doi:10.2307/975901
  • Rourke, F. E. (1969). Bureaucracy, politics, and public policy. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
  • Rourke, F. E. (1992). Responsiveness and Neutral Competence in American Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 52(6), 539–546. doi:10.2307/977164
  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290. doi:10.1177/0162243904271724
  • Saltzstein, G. H. (1992). Bureaucratic responsiveness: Conceptual issues ad current research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 63–88.
  • Schumaker, P. D. (1975). Policy responsiveness to protest-group demands. The Journal of Politics, 37(2), 488–521. doi:10.1017/S0022381600041256
  • Schumaker, P. D., & Loomis, B. (1979). Responsiveness to citizen preferences and societal problems in American communities. In S. Hines, & G. Hopkins (Eds.), South Atlantic Urban Studies. Columbia, SC: University of South California.
  • Shaffer, W. R., & Weber, R. E. (1974). Policy responsiveness in the American States. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Sharp, E. B. (1981). Responsiveness in urban service delivery: The case of policing. Administration & Society, 13(1), 33–58. doi:10.1177/009539978101300103
  • Simon, H. A., Simthburg, D. W., & Thompson, V. A. (1950). Public administration. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Steinburg, C. (1992). Taking charge of change. Training and Development, 46(3), 26–32.
  • Stivers, C. (1994). The listening bureaucrat: Responsiveness in public administration. Public Administration Review, 54(4), 364–369. doi:10.2307/977384
  • Svara, J.H. (1990). Official leadership in the city. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Svara, J.H. (1998). The politics-administration dichotomy model as aberration. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 51–58.
  • Svara, J. H. (2009). Introduction to the symposium: The nature of public professionalism and the future of ASPA. Public Administration Review, 69, 1037–1039. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-6
  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
  • Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-5
  • Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. doi:10.1111/puar.2008.68.issue-2
  • Wheeland, C. M. (2000). City management in the 1990s: Responsibilities, roles, and practices. Administration & Society, 32(3), 255–281. doi:10.1177/00953990022019425
  • Williamson, A., & Fung, A. (2004). Public deliberation: Where are we and where can we go? National Civic Review, 93(4), 3–15. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7811
  • Yang, K. (2009). Examining perceived honest performance reporting by public organizations: Bureaucratic politics and organizational practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 81–105. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum042
  • Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). Public responsiveness of government organizations: Testing a preliminary model. Public Performance & Management Review, 31(2), 215–240. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576310204

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.