e-Government Development and Government Effectiveness: A Reciprocal Relationship

References

• Bekkers, V., & Homburg, V. (2007). The myths of e-government: Looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society, 23, 373–382. doi:10.1080/01972240701572913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgault, J., & Van Dorpe, K. (2013). Managerial reforms, Public Service Bargains and top civil servant identity. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 49–70. doi:10.1177/0020852312467739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, S. (2003). Information technology, e‐government, and institutional change. Public Administration Review, 63, 738–741. doi:10.1111/puar.2003.63.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., & Crosby, B. C. (2001). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Caldow, J. (2002). Seven e-government milestones. In Delivering the vision. Public services for the information society and the knowledge economy (pp. 17–38). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P., & Røvik, K. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cordella, A., & Iannacci, F. (2010). Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19, 52–66. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coursey, D., & Norris, D. (2008). Models of e‐government: Are they correct? An empirical assessment. Public Administration Review, 68, 523–536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00888.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, G., & Chapman, J. (2012). Better public services? Public management and the New Zealand model. Public Policy, 7(2), 151.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 467–494. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, T. (Ed.). (2003). OECD e-government studies the e-government imperative. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. (2002). Information, institutions and governance. In National center for digital government. Boston, MA: JFK School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. (2011). Disjointed innovation: The political economy of digitally mediated institutional reform. Retrieved from SSRN 1916392 (2011). 10.2139/ssrn.1916392
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J. E. (2006). Enacting technology in networked governance: Developmental processes of cross-agency arrangements. In National center for digital government. Boston, MA: JFK School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gauld, R., & Goldfinch, S. (2006). Dangerous enthusiasms: E-government, computer failure and information systems development. Dunedin, New Zealand: University of Otago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., & Wallis, J. (2010). Two myths of convergence in public management reform. Public Administration, 88(4), 1099–1115. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grint, K. (2005). Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership. Human Relations, 58, 1467–1494. doi:10.1177/0018726705061314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halligan, J. (2013). The evolution of Public Service Bargains of Australian senior public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79, 111–129. doi:10.1177/0020852312464935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeks, R., & Bailur, S. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspective, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice working paper No. 16, Institute for Development Policy and Management. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heifetz, R., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. H., & Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. New York, NY: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69, 3–19. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1994). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10, 104–117. doi:10.1177/095207679501000208
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2000). Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal, 3, 1–22. doi:10.1016/S1096-7494(00)00032-5
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargains: Reward, competency, loyalty-and blame. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (Vol. 3). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2000). Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 7–34. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024267
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., & Kim, D. (2003). South Korean public officials’ perceptions of values, failure, and consequences of failure in e-government leadership. Public Performance & Management Review, 26, 360–375. doi:10.1177/1530957603026004004
   Google Scholar
• Korac-Kakabadse, A., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1997). Best practice in the Australian Public Service (APS): An examination of discretionary leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 12, 433–491. doi:10.1108/02683949710181209
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. (2010). Public service bargains in British central government: Multiplication, diversification and reassertion. In Painter, M. and Peters, B.G. (Eds.), Tradition and public administration. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Gill, D. (2011). Toward a new era of administrative reform? The myth of post‐NPM in New Zealand. Governance, 24, 141–166. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2010.01508.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk, S. (2009). The impact of leadership and stakeholders on the success/failure of e-government service: Using the case study of e-stamping service in Hong Kong. Government Information Quarterly, 26, 594–604. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2009.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margetts, H., & Dunleavy, P. (2013). The second wave of digital-era governance: A quasi-paradigm for government on the Web. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371, 20120382. doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel, E. A. (2005). Facilitating cross-boundary leadership in emerging e-government leaders. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 2, 1–10. doi:10.1504/EG.2005.006644
   Google Scholar
• Nanus, B., & Dobbs, S. M. (1999). Leaders who make a difference: Essential strategies for meeting the nonprofit challenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, D., & Reed, M. (2010). ‘Leaderism’: An evolution of managerialism in UK public service reform. Public Administration, 88, 960–978. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01864.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Rost, J. C. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Prager.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, B. (1973). Administrative factor; papers in organization, politics and development. London, UK: Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1998). Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand’s reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13, 123–131. doi:10.1093/wbro/13.1.123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). e-government adoption model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17–35. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullock, G., Brady, G. L., & Seldon, A. (2002). Government failure: A primer in public choice. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2003). UN global e-government survey 2003. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2004). UN global e-government readiness report 2004: Towards access for opportunity. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2005). UN global e-government readiness report 2005: From E-government to E-inclusion. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2008). The united nations e-government survey 2008: From e-government to connected governance. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2010). United Nations e-government survey 2010: Leveraging e-government at a time of financial and economic crisis. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2012). United Nations e-government survey 2012: E-government for the people. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, J., & Dollery, B. E. (1999). Market failure, government failure, leadership and public policy. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wallis, J. L., Dollery, B. E., & McLoughlin, L. (2007). Reform and leadership in the public sector: A political economy approach. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2008). Definition of e-government. Retrieved May 15, 2009, from http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2013). Worldwide governance indicators. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#doc
   Google Scholar
• Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2007.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., Collier, A., & Deng, H. (2014). A multidimensional and integrative approach to study global digital divide and e-government development. Information Technology & People, 27, 38–62. doi:10.1108/ITP-01-2013-0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, F., Wallis, J., & Singh, M. (2015). E-government development and the digital economy: A reciprocal relationship. Internet Research, 25, 734–766. doi:10.1108/IntR-02-2014-0055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar