What about Financial Sustainability of Local Government!—A Critical Review of Accountability, Transparency, and Public Assurance Arrangements in England during Austerity

References

• Ahrens, T., & Ferry, L. (2015). NCC and the Grassroots: Accountability and Budgeting under Austerity. Accounting, Audit and Accountability Journal, 28(8), 909–933. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-03-2014-1658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2012). Rethinking public service delivery. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., & Delbridge, R. (2009). Escape from the Iron Cage? Organizational change and isomorphic pressures in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 165–187. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. (2009). Final score: The impact of comprehensive performance assessment of local government 2002–2008. London, UK: Audit Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, A., & Seal, W. (2005). Social justice in a cold climate: Could social accounting make a difference? Accounting Forum, 29(4), 455–473. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2005.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, M., Allen, T., Grace, C., & Martin, S. (2014). Self, sector or centre? Approaches to turnaround. London, UK: LGA.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Goodin, R., & Schillemans, T. (2014). The oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Smith, D. (2008). Follow the money: The audit commission public money and the management of public services 1983–2008. London, UK: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Public Scrutiny. (2014). What rotherham and mid-Staffordshire tell us about public scrutiny and where it is lacking. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.cfps.org.uk/publications?item=11669&offset=0
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Public Scrutiny. (2015a). Local public accounts committees expanding on our December 2013 paper. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.cfps.org.uk/domains/cfps.org.uk/local/media/downloads/2015-03-25_- local_pac_further_details_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Public Scrutiny. (2015b). Annual review 2014–2015. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from http://www.cfps.org.uk/publications?item=11649&offset=0
   Google Scholar
• Cruz, N. F., Da, Tavares, A. F., Marques, R. C., Jorge, S., & De Sousa, L. (2016). Measuring local government transparency. Public Management Review, 18(6), 866–893. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1051572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2010a). Regional Government. Statement by Rt Hon Eric Pickles Secretary of State, July 22, 2010. London, UK: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2010b). Departmental books are open to an army of armchair auditors. Statement by Rt Hon Eric Pickles Secretary of State, August 12, 2010. London, UK: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2011). Pickles hails new wave of council transparency. Statement by Rt Hon Eric Pickles Secretary of State, September 29, 2011. London, UK: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Communities and Local Government. (2015). Local government transparency code. London, UK: DCLG.
   Google Scholar
• Downe, J., Grace, C., Martin, S., & Nutley, S. (2010). Theories of public service improvement – A comparative analysis of local performance assessment frameworks. Public Management Review, 12(5), 663–678. doi:10.1080/14719031003633201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, P., Ferry, L., & Zakaria, Z. (2014). A ‘panoptical’ or ‘synoptical’ approach to monitoring performance? Local public services in England and the widening accountability gap. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(6), 529–538. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood, S. (2014). Autonomy, governance, accountability and a new audit regime. Public Money and Management, 34(2), 139–141. doi:10.1080/09540962.2014.887547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteller-Moré, A., & Otero, J. P. (2012). Fiscal Transparency. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1153–1173. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.657839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzioni, A. (2014). The limits of transparency. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 687–688. doi:10.1111/puar.12276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., Coombs, H., & Eckersley, P. (In press). Budgetary stewardship, innovation and working culture: Identifying the missing ingredient in English and Welsh local authorities’ recipes for austerity management. Financial Accountability and Management, 37(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2011). Budgeting and Governing for Deficit Reduction in the UK Public Sector: Act One ‘The Comprehensive Spending Review’. Journal of Finance and Management in the Public Services, 10(1), 14–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2012). Budgeting and Governing for Deficit Reduction in the UK Public Sector: Act Two ‘The Annual Budget’. Public Money and Management, 32(2), 119–126. doi:10.1080/09540962.2012.656017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015a). Accountability and Transparency: A Nuanced Response to Etzioni. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 11–12. doi:10.1111/puar.12303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., & Eckersley, P. (2015b). Budgeting and Governing for Deficit Reduction in the UK Public Sector: Act Three ‘Accountability and Audit Arrangements’. Public Money and Management, 35(3), 203–210. doi:10.1080/09540962.2015.1027496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., Eckersley, P., & Van Dooren, W. (2015). Local taxation and spending as a share of GDP in large Western European countries. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1779–1780. doi:10.1177/0308518X15595891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferry, L., Eckersley, P., & Zakaria, Z. (2015). Accountability and Transparency in English Local Government: Moving from “matching parts” to “awkward couple”? Financial Accountability and Management, 31(3), 345–361. doi:10.1111/faam.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2001). Hybrid Forms of Accountability: Citizen engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India. Public Management Review, 3(3), 363–383. doi:10.1080/14616670110051957
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton. (2015). Local Government Governance Review. Retrieved August 11, 2015, from http://www.grant-thornton.co.uk/Global/Publication_pdf/Local-government-governance-review-2015-All-aboard.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2010). Accountability and transparency: Siamese twins, matching parts, awkward couple? West European Politics, 33(5), 989–1009. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopwood, A. G. (1984). Accounting and the pursuit of efficiency. In A. G. Hopwood, & C. Tomkins (Eds.), Issues in public sector accounting (pp. 167–187). Oxford, UK: Philip Allan.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons. (2011). Select Committee: Audit and inspection of local authorities - Communities and Local Government Committee 4th Report. Norwich, UK: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons Public Accounts Committee. (2015). Financial sustainability of local authorities. Thirty–fourth Report of Session 2014–15. HC 833 Norwich, UK: TSO.
   Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J., Wood, A., & Gibbs, M. (2013). Report to the Secretary of State for education on ways forward for children’s services in Doncaster. Retrieved August 12, 2015, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/212598/Ways_forward_for_children_s_services_in_Doncaster.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association. (2011). Taking the lead: Self-regulation and improvement in local government. London, UK: LGA.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association. (2014). Evaluation of sector–led improvement. London, UK: LGA.
   Google Scholar
• Local Government Association. (2015). Taking stock: Where next with sector-led improvement? London, UK: LGA.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local governance under the coalition government: Austerity, localism and the Big Society. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.642949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C., & Nutley, S. (2013). New development: All change? Performance assessment regimes in UK local government. Public Money and Management, 33(4), 277–280. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.799816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. (2014). Transparency. In M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, & T. Schillemans (Eds.), The oxford handbook of public accountability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Neely, A. (2010). Performance measurement in the public sector in England: Searching for the golden thread. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 591–600. doi:10.1111/puar.2010.70.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár, M. (2008). The accountability paradigm: Standards of excellence. Public Management Review, 10(1), 127–137. doi:10.1080/14719030701763245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2008). The dynamics of performance management: Constructing information and reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2013). Financial management in government – Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London, UK: Houses of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2014a). Financial sustainability of local authorities. London, UK: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2014b). The impact of funding reductions on local authorities. London, UK: NAO.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. (2015). Principles Paper: Managing provider failure. London, UK: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Ospina, S., Grau, N. C., & Zaltsman, A. (2004). Performance evaluation, public management improvement and democratic accountability. Public Management Review, 6(2), 229–251. doi:10.1080/1471903042000189119
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking About Government. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658. doi:10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, M. (1997). The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raudla, R., Savi, R., & Liedemann, E. (2013). The use of performance information in cutback budgeting: The case of Estonia. COCOPS sponsored paper prepared for ECPR General Conference in Bordeaux, 4–7 September.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1999). Control and power in central-local Government relations. Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Samaratunge, R., Alam, Q., & Teicher, J. (2008). Public sector reforms and accountability: The case of south and Southeast Asia. Public Management Review, 10(1), 101–126. doi:10.1080/14719030701763237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seal, W. (1999). Accounting and competitive tendering in UK local government: An institutionalist interpretation of the new public management. Financial Accountability & Management, 15(3–4), 309–327. doi:10.1111/1468-0408.00087
   Google Scholar
• Seal, W. (2003). Modernity, modernization and the deinstitutionalization of incremental budgeting in local government. Financial Accountability & Management, 19(2), 93–116. doi:10.1111/fam.2003.19.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Seal, W., & Ball, A. (2005). Regulating corporate performance and the managerialisation of local politics. International Public Management Review, 6(1), 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Seal, W., & Ball, A. (2006). Re-inventing budgeting: The impact of third way modernisation on local government budgeting. London, UK: CIMA.
   Google Scholar
• Seal, W., & Ball, A. (2011). Interpreting the dynamics of public sector budgeting: A dialectic of control approach. Financial Accountability and Management, 27(4), 409–436. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0408.2011.00531.x
   Google Scholar
• Shaoul, J., Stafford, A., & Stapleton, P. (2012). Accountability and corporate governance of public private partnerships. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(3), 213–229. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2011.12.006
   Google Scholar
• So, B. W. Y. (2014). Civic engagement in the performance evaluation of the Public Sector in China: Building horizontal accountability to enhance vertical accountability. Public Management Review, 16(3), 341–357. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.770055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmins, N., & Gash, T. (2014). Dying to Improve: The Demise of the Audit Commission and Other Improvement Agencies. London, UK: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dooren, W., Bouckaert, G., & Halligan, J. (2015). Performance management in the public sector (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1964). The politics of the budgetary process. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Wildavsky, A. (1975). Budgeting: A comparative theory of Budgetary Processes. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2012). Coming to terms with accountability. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011–1036. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.662446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D., & Game, C. (2011). Local government in the UK. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar