The National Research Council’s Rankings of Doctoral Programs in Public Affairs

References

• Adams, G. B., & White, J. D. (1994). Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields: An assessment of methods and quality. Public Administration Review, 54(6), 565–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A. W., & Solmon, L. C. (1981). Are reputational ratings needed to measure quality? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 13(7), 14–19. doi:10.1080/00091383.1981.9936988
   Google Scholar
• Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2011). College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 3–23. doi:10.1007/s11162-010-9185-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, W. E., Dundar, H., & Toutkoushian, R. K. (1998). The National Research Council graduate program ratings: What are they measuring? The Review of Higher Education, 21(4), 427–443. doi:10.1353/rhe.1998.0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2011). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: Exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education, 61(4), 431–444. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9339-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, R. E. (1992). Revisiting the doctoral dissertation in public administration: An examination of the dissertations of 1990. Public Administration Review, 52(1), 55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. W. (1996). Faculty, graduate student, and graduate productivity in public administration and public affairs programs, 1986–1993. Public Administration Review, 56, 433–440. doi:10.2307/977042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farber, M., Powers, P., & Thompson, F. (1984). Assessing faculty research productivity in graduate public policy programs. Policy Sciences, 16(3), 281–289. doi:10.1007/BF00138514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. P. (1996). Public administration productivity: An assessment of faculty in PA programs. Administration & Society, 27(4), 537–566. doi:10.1177/009539979602700404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowles, J., Frederickson, H. G., & Koppell, J. G. (2016). University rankings: Evidence and a conceptual framework. Public Administration Review, 76(5), 790–803. doi:10.1111/puar.12610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederickson, H. G. (2001). Getting ranked. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 33(1), 48–55. doi:10.1080/00091380109601778
   Google Scholar
• Goldberger, M. L., Maher, B. A., & Flattau, P. E. (1995). Research doctorate programs in the United States: Continuity and change. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from https://books.google.com/books?id=G_tK4C8D9fsC&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ViewAPI#v=onepage&q&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the US News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995–2004. Economics of Education Review, 26(2), 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunig, S. D. (1997). Research, reputation, and resources: The effect of research activity on perceptions of undergraduate education and institutional resource acquisition. Journal of Higher Education, 68(1), 17–52. doi:10.2307/2959935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. V., Lindzey, G., & Coggeshall, P. E. (1982). Assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academy of Science Press. Retrieved June 20, 2015, from http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9781&page=R1
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, J. K., & Green, K. C. (1980). A question of quality: The higher education ratings game. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report (No. 5). Retrieved from www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ir.37019958608/pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Legge, J. S., & Devore, J. (1987). Measuring productivity in US public administration and public affairs programs 1981–1985. Administration & Society, 19(2), 147–156. doi:10.1177/009539978701900201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luca, M., & Smith, J. (2013). Salience in quality disclosure: Evidence from the US News college rankings. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(1), 58–77. doi:10.1111/jems.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, H. E., & Cleary, R. E. (1984). Why can’t we resolve the research issue in public administration? Public Administration Review, 44(1), 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Pérez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39(5), 513–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monks, J., & Enrenberg, R. G. (1999). The Impact of U.S. News & World Report college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau Of Economic Research. Retrieved July 2, 2015, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w7227.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. R., Meier, K. J., Kearney, R. C., Hays, S. W., & Birch, H. B. (1981). Reputation and productivity among US public administration and public affairs programs. Public Administration Review, 41, 666–673. doi:10.2307/975743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, R. (2016). Methodology: Best public affairs schools rankings. Retrieved July 2, 2016, from http://www.usnews.com/education/best-graduate-schools/articles/public-affairs-schools-methodology?int=a95909
   Google Scholar
• Myers, L., & Robe, J. (2009). College rankings: History, criticism and reform. A Report from the Center for College Affordability and Productivity, Retrieved July 1, 2015, from http://www.centerforcollegeaffordability.org/uploads/College_Rankings_History.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ostriker, J. P., Kuh, C. V., & Voytuk, J. A. (2010). A revised guide to the methodology of the data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved July 1, 2015, from http://web.mit.edu/ir/rankings/nrc/2010GuideMethodology.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ostriker, J. P., Kuh, C. V., & Voytuk, J. A. (2011). A data-based assessment of research-doctorate programs in the United States. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Retrieved June 23, 2014, from https://grants.nih.gov/training/research_doctorates.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sweitzer, K., & Volkwein, J. F. (2009). Prestige among graduate and professional schools: Comparing the US News’ graduate school reputation ratings between disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 812–836. doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9140-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1130. doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, D. S. (1992). Rankings of undergraduate education in US News & World Report and Money: Are they any good? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 24(2), 19–31. doi:10.1080/00091383.1992.9937104
   Google Scholar
• White, J. D. (1986). Dissertations and publications in public administration. Public Administration Review, 46(3), 227–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A. M., Slagle, D. R., & Wilson, D. (2014). Ranking universities for scholarship in public administration research 2006–2010. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 20(3), 393–412.
   Google Scholar