Networked Co-Production of 311 Services: Investigating the Use of Twitter in Five U.S. Cities

References

• Agarwal, P. K. (2013). 311 services: A real-world perspective. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 702–703. doi:10.1111/puar.12115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. B. (2002). Computer-mediated communication: Human to human communication across the Internet. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Hansen, D. (2012). The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. doi:10.1111/puar.2007.67.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, H. (2014). The institutional digital divide: Immigrant-serving nonprofit organization adoption of social media. Social Science Computer Review, 33(6),680–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 43, 59–65. doi:10.2307/975300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cela, K. L., Sicilia, M. Á., & Sánchez, S. (2015). Social network analysis in e-learning environments: A preliminary systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 219–246. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9276-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesebro, J. W., & Bonsall, D. G. (1989). Computer-mediated communication: Human relationships in a computerized world. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Marking connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S. G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont, G. (2016). Resident-government engagement via new technologies. Presented at ASPA 2016 annual conference, Seattle, WA.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002). Administrative ethics and professional competence: Accountability and performance under globalization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(1), 127–143. doi:10.1177/0020852302681007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2009). Building administrative capacity for the age of rapid globalization: A modest prescription for the twenty-first century. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1007–1020. doi:10.1111/puar.2009.69.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2013). Governance in the age of globalization: Challenges and opportunities for south and Southeast Asia. Public Organization Review, 13, 349–363. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0249-4
   Google Scholar
• Feeney, M. K., & Welch, E. W. (2014). Technology–task coupling: Exploring social media use and managerial perceptions of e-government. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferro, E., Loukis, E. N., Charalabidis, Y., & Osella, M. (2013). Policy making 2.0: From theory to practice. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 359–368. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, S., & Crawford, S. (2014). The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati, G. J., & Williams, C. B. (2013). Social media and campaign 2012 developments and trends for Facebook adoption. Social Science Computer Review, 31(5), 577–588. doi:10.1177/0894439313489258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himelboim, I., Smith, M., & Shneiderman, B. (2013). Tweeting apart: Applying network analysis to detect selective exposure clusters in Twitter. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3–4), 195–223. doi:10.1080/19312458.2013.813922
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. T. K., & McCall, B. (2016). Ten actions to implement big data initiatives: A study of 65 cities. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• ICMA. (2008). Customer Service and 311/CRM Technology in Local Governments: Lessons on Connecting with Citizens. ICMA.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. (2012). Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 27–54. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M., & Andersen, S. C. (2013). Coproduction and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 704–713. doi:10.1111/puar.2013.73.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., & Moore, M. (2004). Institutionalised co-production: Unorthodox public service delivery in challenging environments. Journal of Development Studies, 40(4),31–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiser, L. L., & Percy, S. L. (1980). The concept of coproduction and its implications for public service delivery. Presented in 1980 Annual Meetings of the American Society for Public Administration, April 13-16, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kuz, A., Falco, M., De Renzis, E., Nahuel, L., & Giandini, R. S. (2015). Using social network analysis in the classroom: A case study applying NodeXL. XXI Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación.
   Google Scholar
• Landsbergen, D. (2010). Government as part of the revolution: Using social media to achieve public goals. Electronic Journal of E-Government, 8(2), 135–147.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, C. H., & Fisher, G. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178–189. doi:10.2307/975559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipschultz, J. H. (2015). Social media communication in the classroom: A pedagogical case study of social network analysis. In DF Conway, et al. (Eds.), Digital Media in Teaching and Its Added Value (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Waxmann Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29, 446–454. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2012.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovejoy, K., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 337–353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: An introduction. In J. Scott, & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11–25). London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Meijer, A. J. (2011). Networked coproduction of public services in virtual communities: From a government-centric to a community approach to public service support. Public Administration Review, 71(4), 598–607. doi:10.1111/puar.2011.71.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizruchi, M. S. (1994). Social network analysis: Recent achievements and current controversies. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 329–343. doi:10.1177/000169939403700403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nah, S., & Saxton, G. D. (2012). Modeling the adoption and use of social media by nonprofit organizations. New Media & Society, 15, 294–313. doi:10.1177/1461444812452411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2012). Modeling municipal service integration: A comparative case study of New York and Philadelphia 311 systems (Doctoral Dissertation). State University of New York at Albany.
   Google Scholar
• Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2013). Identifying success factors and challenges of 311-driven service integration: A comparative case study of NYC311 and Philly311. Proceedings of the 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, T. (June 3, 2015). Scaling down 311: Challenges and opportunities with multichannel CRM. Retrieved from http://www.govtech.com/dc/articles/Scaling-Down-311-Challenges-and-Opportunities-with-Multichannel-CRM.html
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World development, 24(6), 1073–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., & Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Osborne, S. P., & Brandsen, T. (2006). Patterns of co-production in public services: Some concluding thoughts. Public Management Review, 8(4), 591–595. doi:10.1080/14719030601022999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 49–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddick, C. G. (2011). Customer Relationship Management (CRM) technology and organizational change: Evidence for the bureaucratic and e-Government paradigms. Government Information Quarterly, 28(3), 346–353. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2010.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serrat, O. (2009). Social network analysis. Washington, DC: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. doi:10.1177/0093650205279209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A. (2013). NodeXL: Simple network analysis for social media. In R. Alhajj, & J. Rokne (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining (pp. 1153–1170). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Shneiderman, B., & Himelboim, I. (2014). Mapping Twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Pew Research Center, 20.
   Google Scholar
• Suri, M. V. (2013). From crowd-sourcing potholes to community policing: Applying interoperability theory to analyze the expansion of 'Open311'. Berkman Center Research Publication: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thurlow, C., Lengel, L., & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer mediated communication. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Sinnaeve, I., Van Houtte, M., & Van Braak, J. (2010). ICT as cultural capital: The relationship between socio-economic status and the computer-use profile of young people. New Media & Society, 13(1), 151–168. doi:10.1177/1461444810369245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres, L. H. (2007). Citizen sourcing in the public interest. Knowledge Management for Development Journal, 3(1), 134–145.
   Google Scholar
• Tremayne, M. (2014). Anatomy of protest in the digital era: A network analysis of Twitter and Occupy Wall Street. Social Movement Studies, 13(1), 110–126. doi:10.1080/14742837.2013.830969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101. doi:10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, A. M., Sulaiman, A., & Jaafar, N. I. (2014). Social media effects on fostering online civic engagement and building citizen trust and trust in institutions. Government Information Quarterly, 31(2), 291–301. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, G. P. (1980). Coproduction: Citizen participation in service delivery. Public Administration Review, 40, 240–246. doi:10.2307/975377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, J. (2014). Can 311 call centers improve service delivery? Lessons from New York and Chicago. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar