Managing Social Risk in China Local Administration: An Examination of SSRA Initiative

References

• Alidoosti, A., Yazdani, M., Fouladgar, M. M., & Basiri, M. H. (2012). Risk assessment of critical asset using fuzzy inference system. Risk Management, 14(1), 77–91. doi:10.1057/rm.2011.19
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, E. C. (2015). Risk governance and development. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ann, T. W., Wu, Y., Zheng, B., Zhang, X., & Shen, L. (2014). Identifying risk factors of urban-rural conflict in urbanization: A case of China. Habitat International, 44, 177–185. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. R. (2013). The practice of social research (13th ed.). Vermont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2001). An introduction to content analysis qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed., pp. 238–267). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Borins, S. (2001). The challenge of innovating in government. Arlington, VA: Price water house Coopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Breakdown of the state four-trillion stimulus package by sector and an update on the projects invested in by central government (Development and Reform Commission of China). Retrieved May 8, 2015, from: http://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xwzx/xwtt/t20090521_280383.htm
   Google Scholar
• CPC Central Committee. (2009). Decision of the CPC Central Committee on several important issues concerning Strengthening and improving Party building under the new situation. Beijing, China: Xinhua News Agency.
   Google Scholar
• CPC Central Committee and China State Council. (2012). Guidance (Trial) on establishing a sound social stability risk assessment mechanism. (No. 2). Beijing, China: Xinhua News Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, J. (2009). Governing by goals and numbers: A case study in the use of performance measurement to build state capacity in China. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), 21–31. doi:10.1002/pad.514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, P., & Edmonds, R. L. (2008). China’s embedded activism: Opportunities and constraints of a social movement. In Studies on China in transition (Vol. 30). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. S. (2010). Building trust by improving governance: Searching for a feasible way for developing countries. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 271–299.
   Google Scholar
• Leib,, & Ethan, J. (2006). The search for deliberative democracy in China. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, A. T., & Grubesic, T. H. (2012). Critical infrastructure protection: The vulnerability conundrum. Telematics and Informatics, 29(1), 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2011.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., & Donahue, J. (2000). Governance in globalizing world. Washington, DC: Brook Institution.
   Google Scholar
• O’Faircheallaigh, C. (2010). Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(1), 19–27. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2009.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortwin R., Andreas K., Marjolein V A. (2011). Coping with Complexity, Certainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis. AMBIO—A Journal of the Human Environment, 40(2), 231–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2008). White Paper on Risk Governance: Toward an Integrative Framework. Global Risk Governance. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Klinke, A., & van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. AMBIO- A Journal of the Human Environment, 40(2), 231–246. doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan, C., & Yai, T. (2011). Public involvement requirements for infrastructure planning in China. Habitat International, 35(1), 158–166. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Q., Liu, Y., Zuo, J., Pan, N., & Ma, G. (2015). On the management of social risks of hydraulic infrastructure projects in China: A case study. International Journal of Project Management, 33(3), 483–496. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, X., & Zhang, H. B. (2007). China’s transition social risk and identification—Theory discussion and experience research. Nanjing, China: Nanjing University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2006). Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 3–14. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, G. (2011). Dilemmas of scientific development. Asian Survey, 51, 18–32. doi:10.1525/as.2011.51.1.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xinhua News Agency, Decision of the CCCPC on Some Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening the Reform, (2012). 11–12.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, G. (2010). China social stability risk assessment practice. Nanjing, China: Phoenix Publishing Media Group, China.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar