Obstacles and Opportunities for Sustaining Performance Management Systems

References

• Ammons, D. (1997). Raising the performance bar…locally. Public Management, 79, 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ammons, David (1995). Overcoming the inadequacies of performance measurement in local government: The case of libraries and leisure services. Public Administration Review, 55(1), 37–47. doi:10.2307/976826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barzelay, M. (1992). Breaking through bureaucracy: A new vision for managing in government. Berkeley, CA: University of California press.
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 586–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2004). Performance leadership: 11 better practices that can ratchet up performance. Washington D.C, United States.: IBM center for the business of government.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., & Wang, X. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60(5), 409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Haverland, M. (2012). Designing case studies: Explanatory approaches in small-N research. Hampshire, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, C., & Chikoto, G. (2008). Legislative influences on performance management reforms. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 253–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014a). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014b). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dull, M. (2009). Results-model reform leadership: Questions of credible commitment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 255–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2011). Survey methodology (Vol. 561). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H. (2006). Performance measurement: Getting results. Washington D.C, USA: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hatry, H., Gerhart, C., & Marshall, M. (1994). Eleven ways to male performance measurement more useful to public managers. Public Management, 76(9), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Hedley, T. P. (1998). Measuring public sector effectiveness using private sector methods. Public Productivity and Management Review, 21(3), 251–258.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. T., & Haist, M. P. (2006). Putting performance measurement in context. In P. W. Ingraham, & L. E. Lynn (eds.), The art of governance (pp. 173–194). Washington D.C, USA: Georgetown university press.
   Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61(6), 693–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2008). Performance measurement: Building theory, supporting practice. New York, NY, USA: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F., & Kelman, S. (2007). Reflections on 21st century government management. Washington D.C, USA: IBM Center for the business of government.
   Google Scholar
• Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review, 73(2), 59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Likerman, A. (2009). The five traps of performance measurement. Harvard Business Review, 87(10), 96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micheli, P., & Neely, A. (2010). Performance measurement in the public sector in England: Searching for the golden thread. Public Administration Review, 70(4), 591–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. (2006). Managing for results in state government: Evaluating a decade of reform. Public Administration Review, 66(1), 77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Ingraham, P. W. (2004). Integrative leadership in the public sector: A model of performance information use. Administration & Society, 36(4), 427–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., & Landuyt, N. (2009). How do public organizations learn? Bridging structural and cultural divides. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1097–1105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 143–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, M. (2009). Overcoming the 9 deadly sins of balanced scorecards. Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 20(6), 83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Adison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the state of practice. Public Administration Review, 59(4), 325–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainey, H. G. (2003). Understanding and managing public organization. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Remler, D. K., & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2011). Research methods in practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rivenbark, W. C. (2000). Embracing risk-based auditing in local government. Government Finance Review, 16(3), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sanger, M. B. (2008). From measurement to management: Breaking through the barriers to state and local performance. Public Administration Review. Special Issue, 570–585.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, H. L. (2010). Objective and subjective performance measures: A note on terminology. Administration & Society, 42(5), 550–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (2001). Getting performance measures to measure up. In Quicker, better, cheaper: Managing performance in American government (pp. 39–60). (D. W. Forsythe, eds.). Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J. (2011). Factors influencing the use of performance information for decision making in Australian state agencies. Public Administration, 89(4), 1316–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wholey, J. (1999). Performance-based management: Responding to the challenges. Public Productivity and Management Review, 22(4), 288–307.
   Google Scholar
• WiaoHu, W. (2000). Performance measurement in budgeting: A study in county government. Public Budgeting and Finance, 20(3), 102–118.
   Google Scholar