Local Government Finance Office Orientation Revisited: Actually, It’s All About Control

References

• Bosworth, K. A. (1958). The manager is a politician. Public Administration Review, 18(1), 216–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. S., Jr. (1990). Comparative fiscal analysis for counties. Public Budgeting and Finance, 10(2), 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, T. N., DeSeve, G., & Johnson, J. C. (1985). Financial handbook for mayors and city managers (2nd ed., pp. 180–182). New York, NY: Van Norstrand Reinhold Company.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K. (2003). Usefully engaging local budget analysts during budget execution. State & Local Government Review, 35(1), 48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K. (2007). Preventing local government fiscal crises: The North Carolina approach. Public Budgeting and Finance, 27(1), 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K. (2008). Preventing local government fiscal crises: Emerging practices. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 759–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, C. K., & Vogt, A. J. (1993). A close look at North Carolina city and county government practices. Popular Government, 6–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gosling, J. J. (1987). The state budget office and policymaking. Public Budgeting and Finance, 7(1), 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, S. M., & Valente, M. G. (2003). Evaluating financial conditions: A handbook for local government. Washington, DC: International City/County management Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hensher, D. A., & Johnson, L. W. (1981). Applied discrete-choice modeling. London, UK: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, J. W., & Laverdiere, R. (1986). Comparative local government financial analysis. Public Budgeting and Finance, 6(4), 23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Key, V. O., Jr. (1940). The lack of budgetary theory. American Political Science Review, 34(6), 1137–1144.
   Google Scholar
• Lauth, T. (1978). Zero-based budgeting in Georgia: The myth and the reality. Public Administration Review, 38(5), 420–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-based budgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2008). Defining the role of county commissioners in the budgetary process. Politics & Policy, 36(6), 1044–1065.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2010). State enhancement of local government decision making in the budgetary process: A model for state oversight of local government finances. Public Performance & Management Review, 33(4), 571–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2011a). The declining use of internal service funds: How local governments are changing the allocation of indirect costs. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 23(2), 151–165.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2011b). Who really runs county government? The county manager in the budget formulation process. Public Administration & Management, 16(12), 21–45.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2012). County government finance practices: What independent auditors are finding and what makes local government susceptible. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 24(4), 558–578.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2016a). County government fleet purchasing practices: Financial efficiency v. Need assertion. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 2(1), 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modlin, S. (2016b). Increasing transparency and efficiency: An examination of county government note disclosures. Public Administration Research, 5(2), 59–69.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S., & Stewart, L. (2012). Cash management practices among southeastern county governments: Proper utilization or excessive caution. Public Finance and Management, 12(2), 100–119.
   Google Scholar
• Modlin, S., & Stewart, L. (2014). Staff involvement in the external audit process: Reassessing independent auditor satisfaction levels among professionally administered county governments. Public Administration Quarterly, 38(2), 243–269.
   Google Scholar
• North Carolina General Statute 159 (1973). Raleigh, N.C.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, I. S. (1990a). Budget theory and budget practice: How good the fit? Public Administration Review, 50(2), 179–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, I. S. (1990b). The politics of public budgeting: Getting and spending, borrowing and balancing. Chatham, New Jersey: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1966). The road to PPB: The stages of budget reform. Public Administration Review, 26(4), 244–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1978). The road from ZBB. Public Administration Review, 38(2), 177–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. (1976). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolow, A. D., & Honadle, B. W. (1984). How rural local governments budget. Public Administration Review, 44(5), 373–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurmaier, K. (1995). Execution phase budgeting in local governments: It’s not just for control anymore! State & Local Government Review, 27(2), 102–117.
   Google Scholar
• Thurmaier, K., & Gosling, J. J. (1997). The shifting roles of state budget offices: Gosling revisited. Public Budgeting and Finance, 17(4), 48–70.
   Google Scholar