Preventing Corruption Risk in Legislation: Evidence from Russia, Moldova, and Kazakhstan

References

• Anzhekenova, N. (2014, November 24). It was decided in Kazakhstan that corruption proofing of legal acts was no longer necessary. Zakon.KZ. Retrieved from https://www.zakon.kz/4670156-v-kazakhstane-reshili-chto.html
   Google Scholar
• Astanin, V. (2016). “Anti-corruption assessment of legislation: Developing method and practice”. Monitoring of Law Enforcement Journal, 3, 58–63. ( Moscow).
   Google Scholar
• Bekbaev, Y. (2015). Legal monitoring as a tool of ensuring legality of laws. Vestnik of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 3, 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• CAPC. (2016). Effectiveness of corruption proofing (2015-2016). Chisinau, Moldova: Center for the Analysis and Prevention of Corruption.
   Google Scholar
• Dmitriev, D., & Kudashkin, A. (2013). Anti-corruption expertise conducted by the prosecutor offices: Issues of legal regulation. Administrative Law and Practice, 3, 158–177. ( Moscow).
   Google Scholar
• Freedom House. (2017). Nations in transit 2017, Moldova Country Profile. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2017/moldova
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, L. (2002). Functions and dysfunctions of corruption and its reporting in central and eastern europe. In T.Lindsey & H.Dick (Eds), Corruption in asia: rethinking the governance paradigm (pp. pp. 50–70). Sydney, Australia: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, T. (2014). Anti-corruption assessment of laws (‘Corruption proofing’). Comparative study and methodology. Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina : Regional Cooperation Council.
   Google Scholar
• Izvestia. (2008 July 22). Interview of Dmitry Medvedev to Reuters News Agency. (pp. 1-2). Moscow, Russia: News Media
   Google Scholar
• Kilchling, M. (2004, August 25–28). Crime proofing as a method of criminal preventive risk assessment in the law-making procedure. Paper presented at ESC annual symposium 2004, v.u. Amsterdam, 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.mpicc.de/files/pdf1/kilch_amsterdam041.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kotchegura, A. (2004). Reducing corruption in post-communist countries. International Public Management Review, 5(1), 138–156.
   Google Scholar
• Kysykova, G. (2016, December 1). Tasks of anti-corruption review of draft regulatory acts. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 4, 31–36. ( Moscow).
   Google Scholar
• Moscow Times. (2016, December 1). Putin Promises Economic Growth, Anti-Corruption Fight in Annual Address. (pp. 1). Moscow, Russia: Publishing House “Moscow Times”.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Anti-corruption reforms in Kazakhstan. Monitoring of the Istanbul anti-corruption action plan. Round 3 report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/Kazakhstan-Round-3-Monitoring-Report-ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). Prevention of corruption in the public sector in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Cross country report. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation. (2016). Annual statistics. Retrieved from https://www.genproc.gov.ru/stat.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoza, K. (2016, August. 1). Billion dollar theft: In Moldova, one rich banker’s ‘crime’ has a nation doing time. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2016/08/01/billion-dollar-theft-in-moldova-one-rich-bankers-crime-has-a-nation-doing-time/#737776dc4f7e
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. (2016). Corruption and government: Causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rostova, O. (2016). Anti-corruption expertise of legal acts in the territorial entities of the Russian Federation: Practice and realization. RUDN Journal, Law Series, 3, 76–82. ( Moscow).
   Google Scholar
• Safarova, T. (2015). Legal monitoring in the Republic of Kazakhstan: Theoretical–analytical aspect. Vestnik of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 4, 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Savona, E. (2006). The crime risk assessment mechanism for proofing EU and national legislation against crime. Final Report of Project MARC. Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore and Transcrime.
   Google Scholar
• Savona, E. (2017). Proofing legislation against crime as situational prevention measure. In B. LeClerc, & E. Savona (Eds.), Crime prevention in the 21st century . (pp. 247–274). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Strategic Plans. (2016). Strategic Plan of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan for the period 2017-2021. Retrieved from http://www.adilet.gov.kz/sites/default/files/sp_na_2017-2021_rus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Talapina, E. (2004). Analyzing legislation for corruption risk: Handbook for experts. In V.Yuzhakov (Ed.), Initial assessment of legislation for corruption risk (pp. pp. 24–42). Moscow, Russia: Statut.
   Google Scholar
• Tarna, C. (2014). Anti-corruption expertise of draft legislation in Moldova. Presentation in Tirana on 14 November 2014; Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/COSP/session6/SpecialEvents/2015_11_05_CristinaTarnaMoldova.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2016). Global corruption barometer. People and corruption: Europe and Central Asia. Retrieved from https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/publication/7493
   Google Scholar
• Turetsky, V. (2014, October 31). Anti-corruption expertise of legislation: Necessity or excess. Kazakhstan News. Retrieved from http://www.zakon.kz/4669161-antikorrupcionnaja-jekspertiza-npa.html
   Google Scholar
• Vokaze, K. (2014). Legal expertise in legislative process. Law and State, 1, 14–21. ( Kazguu).
   Google Scholar
• Voronina, Y. (2013). The essence of the principles of corruption proofing of draft and acting legal acts in the Russian Federation. Vestnik of Udmurt University, Series Economy and Law, 1, 115–120.
   Google Scholar
• Vrieze, F. D. (2016). Anti-corruption self-assessment report for the parliament of the Republic of Moldova. Chisinau, Moldova UNDP Office in Moldova.
   Google Scholar
• Yuzhakov, V. (Ed). (2007). Guidelines for initial assessment of laws for corruption risk. Moscow, Russia: CSD.
   Google Scholar
• Yuzhakov, V. (2008). Corruption proofing of legal and normative acts. Public Administration Issues, 2, 4–42. ( Moscow: High School of Economics).
   Google Scholar
• Yuzhakov, V. (Ed). (2014). Corruption proofing of draft and enacted legal and normative acts: Formation, experience, perspectives. Moscow, Russia: Delo.
   Google Scholar