Does IPSAS Meet Heritage Assets’ User Needs?

References

• Adam, B., Mussari, R., & Jones, R. (2011). The diversity of accrual policies in local government financial reporting: an examination of infrastructure, art and heritage assets in Germany, Italy and the UK. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(2), 107–133.
   Google Scholar
• Anessi Pessina, E., Nasi, G., & Steccolini, I. (2008). Accounting reforms: Determinants of local governments choices. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(3), 321–342.
   Google Scholar
• Aversano, N., & Christiaens, J. (2014). Governmental financial reporting of heritage assets from a user needs perspective. Financial Accountability & Management, 30(2), 150–175.
   Google Scholar
• Aversano, N., Sannino, G., & Tartaglia Polcini, P. (2015). Heritage assets in local government financial reporting: The analysis of two case studies. Journal of Economy, Business and Financing, 3(1), 35–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bakar, N. B. A., & Ismail, S. (2011). Financial Management Accountability Index (FMAI) in the Malaysian public sector: A way forward. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 159–190. doi:10.1177/0020852310390281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambagiotti-Albert, L., Manetti, G., & Sibilio-Parri, B. (2016). The quality of annual reporting by Italian museums: An international comparison. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(14), 1159–1170. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1070361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, P. (2006). Heritage assets can accounting do better? Accountancy Ireland, 38(4), 48–50.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., & Clinch, G. (1998). Revalued financial, tangible, and intangible assets: Associations with share prices and non-market-based value estimates. Journal of Accounting Research, 36, 199–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, A. D. (2000). Accounting for public heritage facilities – Assets or liabilities of the government? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 13(2), 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, A. D. (2005). The conceptual arguments concerning accounting for public heritage assets: A note. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 434–440.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, S. D., Jagalla, T., & Skærbæk, P. (2014). The translation of accrual accounting and budgeting and the reconfiguration of public sector accountants’ identities. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4), 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benito, B., Brusca, I., & Montesinos, V. (2007). The harmonization of government financial information systems: The role of IPSASs. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 3(2), 293–317. doi:10.1177/0020852307078424
   Google Scholar
• Biondi, L., & Lapsley, I. (2014). Accounting, transparency and governance: The heritage assets problem. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 11(2), 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2003). Evaluating the quality of public governance: Indicators, models and methodologies. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69, 313–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caperchione, E., & Lapsley, I. (2011). Making comparisons in government accounting. Financial Accountability & Management, 27(2), 103–106.
   Google Scholar
• Caperchione, E., & Mussari, R. (2000). Comparative issues in local government accounting. Boston, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., & Wolnizer, P. W. (1995). The financial value of cultural, heritage and scientific collections: An accounting fiction. Australian Accounting Review, 5(1), 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Carnegie, G. D., & Wolnizer, P. W. (1996). Enabling accountability in museums. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9(5), 84–99.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J. (2004). Capital assets in governmental accounting reforms: Comparing Flemish technical issues with international standards. European Accounting Review, 13(4), 743–770.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Rommel, J., Barton, A., & Everaert, P. (2012). Should all capital goods of governments be recognized as assets in financial accounting? Baltic Journal of Management, 7(4), 429–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., Vanhee, J., Manes Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2015). The effect of IPSAS on reforming governmental financial reporting: An international comparison. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(1), 158–177. doi:10.1177/0020852314546580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., Doumpos, M., Neofytou, E., & Zopounidis, C. (2012). Assessing financial distress where bankruptcy is not an option: An alternative approach for local municipalities. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(1), 270–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini, D., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2016). Contextualizing politicians’ uses of accounting information: Reassurance and ammunition. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 483–490. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1237128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greffe, X. (2004). Is heritage an asset or a liability? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 5(3), 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, L. E., & Antonio, J. F. (1990). What users want in government financial reports. Journal of Accountancy, 170(2), 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hooper, K., Kearins, K., & Green, R. (2005). Knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing: Accounting for heritage assets. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 18(3), 410–433.
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2000). IPSAS 17: Property, plant and equipment. New York, NY: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2006). Consultation paper. Accounting for heritage assets under the accrual basis of accounting. New York, NY: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• IPSASB. (2014). Conceptual framework for general purpose financial reporting by public sector entities. New York, NY: IFAC.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, D. B., Scott, R. B., Kimbro, L., & Ingram, R. W. (1985). The needs of users of governmental financial reports. Stamford, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, S., Jesus, M., & Laureano, R. (2016). Governmental accounting maturity towards IPSASs and the approximation to national accounts in the European Union. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(12), 976–988. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1068324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley, I., Mussari, R., & Paulsson, G. (2009). On the adoption of accrual accounting in the public sector: A self-evidence and problematic reform. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 719–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Fisherb, G. (2004). Infrastructure assets disclosure in Australian public sector annual reports. Accounting Forum, 28, 349–367.
   Google Scholar
• Liguori, M., Sicilia, M., & Steccolini, I. (2012). Some Like it Non-Financial… Politicians’ and managers’ views on the importance of performance information. Public Management Review, 14(7), 903–922. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.650054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mack, J., & Ryan, C. (2004). An empirical investigation of users of the general purpose financial reports Australian government departments. Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference 4 to 6 July 2004 Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, J., & Ryan, C. (2006). Reflections on the theoretical underpinnings of the general purpose financial reports of Australian government departments. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19(4), 592–612.
   Google Scholar
• Manes Rossi, F. (2015). Public sector accounting and Auditing in Italy. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. M. Rossi (ed.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe: The challenge of harmonization (pp. 125–142). New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Manes Rossi, F., Aversano, N., & Christiaens, J. (2014). IPSASB’s conceptual framework: Coherence with accounting systems in European Public Administrations. International Journal of Public Administration, 37(8), 456–465.
   Google Scholar
• Mautz, R. (1988, June). Monuments, mistakes and opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 2(2), 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Mayston, D. (1992). Financial reporting in the public sector and the demand for information. Financial Accountability & Management, 8(4), 317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Micallef, F., & Peirson, G. (1997). Financial reporting of cultural, heritage and scientific and community collections. Australian Accounting Review, 7(1), 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nogueira, S. P. S., Margarida, F., Jorge, S., & Cervera Oliver, M. (2013). The usefulness of financial reporting for internal decision-making in Portuguese municipalities. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 11(2), 178–212.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. (2010). The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsson, G. (2006). Accrual accounting in the public sector: Experiences from the central government in Sweden. Financial Accountability & Management, 22(1), 47–62. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00392.x
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., Torres, L., & Yetano, A. (2009). Accrual accounting in EU local governments: One method, several approaches. European Accounting Review, 18(4), 765–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priest, A. N., Ng, J., & Dolley, C. (1999). Users of local government annual reports: Information preferences. Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 5(3), 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, W. A. (1984). Consensus between preparers and users of municipal annual reports: An empirical analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 14(54), 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Saliterer, I., & Korac, S. (2014). The discretionary use of performance information by different local government actors–Analysing and comparing the predictive power of three factor sets. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(3), 637–658. doi:10.1177/0020852313518170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, A. (1995). The chameleon of accountability: Forms and discourses. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soverchia, M. (2010). Analyzing governmental accounting and financial reporting: Italy, European Union, and the United States. International Journal of Public Administration, 33(11), 529–533. doi:10.1080/01900692.2010.507113
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, P. J., & Stanton, P. A. (1997). Governmental accounting for heritage assets; economic, social implications. International Journal of Social Economics, 24(7/8/9), 988–1006.
   Google Scholar
• Steccolini, I. (2004). Is the annual report an accountability medium? An empirical investigation into Italian local governments. Financial Accountability &Management, 20(3), 327–350.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Bogt, H. J. (2004). Politicians in search of performance information?‐Survey research on Dutch Aldermen’s use of performance information. Financial Accountability & Management, 20(3), 221–252. doi:10.1111/j.0267-4424.2004.00387.x
   Google Scholar
• Trenholm, B., & Arcelus, F. (1989). Accounting valuation methods: Structuring an unstructured problem. Accounting Horizons, 3(3), 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Van Helden, J. (2016). Literature review and challenging research agenda on politicians’ use of accounting information. Public Money & Management, 36(7), 531–538. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1237162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Helden, J., Argento, D., Caperchione, E., & Caruana, J. (2016). Editorial: Politicians and accounting information—A marriage of convenience? Public Money & Management, 36(7), 473–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. G., Dean, G. W., & Edwards, P. J. (2004, November). Infrastructure reporting: Attitudes of preparers and potential users. Financial Accountability& Management, 20(4), 351–375.
   Google Scholar