The Multiple Bases of Social Return Platforms: Evidence of a Brazilian Initiative

References

• Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de conteúdo. São Paulo, Brazil: Almedina Brasil.
   Google Scholar
• Bayus, B. L. (2013). Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the dell ideastorm community. Management Science, 59(1), 226–244. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, S. (2013). Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5), 63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K., & Lakhani, K. (2009). How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(4), 69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., & Jeppesen, L. B. (2015). Unpaid crowd complementors: The platform network effect mirage. Strategic Management Journal, 36(12), 1761–1777. doi:10.1002/smj.2324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2008). Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence, 14(1), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2010). Moving the crowd at threadless: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Information, Communication & Society, 13(8), 1122–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2002). Bridge decay. Social Networks, 24(4), 333–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudary, S. P., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Parker, G. G. (2016). Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy–and how to make them work for you. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, R. Y., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J. F. (2015). The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 189–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest editorial: Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), 141–146.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, M. G., Franzoni, C., & Rossi‐Lamastra, C. (2015). Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(1), 75–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2004). Identity ambiguity and change in the wake of a corporate spin-off. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 173–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & Piezunka, H. (2014). Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention. Research Policy, 43(5), 812–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenmann, T., Parker, G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(10), 92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., & Hardey, M. (2014). Social media and local government: Citizenship, consumption and democracy. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., & Noel, M. D. (2008). The analysis of mergers that involve multisided platform businesses. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 4(3), 663–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. S., & Schmalensee, R. (2010). Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses. Review of Network Economics, 9, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., Keinz, P., & Klausberger, K. (2013). “Does this sound like a fair deal?”: Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual’s decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization Science, 24(5), 1495–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleasure, R. (2015). Resistance to crowdfunding among entrepreneurs: An impression management perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(4), 219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2015). Does Twitter increase perceived police legitimacy? Public Administration Review, 75(4), 598–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., & Rothman, S. (2016). Network effects aren’t enough. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagiu, A., & Spulber, D. (2013). First-party content and coordination in two-sided markets. Management Science, 59(4), 933–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2005). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., & Leiba-O’Sullivan, S. (1998). The power behind empowerment: Implications for research and practice. Human Relations, 51(4), 451–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, N., & Wood, C. (2005). Public participation in environmental impact assessment—Implementing the Aarhus convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(4), 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgers, D., & Ihl, C. (2010). Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. The International Journal of Public Participation, 4(1), 67–88.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., Vir Singh, P., & Srinivasan, K. (2014). Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Science, 60(9), 2138–2159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Beech, N. (2003). Contrary prescriptions: Recognizing good practice tensions in management. Organization Studies, 24(1), 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, T. (2015). Crowdsourcing-based business models. California Management Review, 57(4), 63–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Seo, D. (2016). Crowdsourcing not all sourced by the crowd: An observation on the behavior of Wikipedia participants. Technovation, 55, 14–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libert, B., Wind, Y., & Fenley, M. (2014). What Airbnb, Uber, and Alibaba have in common. Harvard Business Review, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, D. (2012). From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 446–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannes, A. E. (2009). Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision. Management Science, 55(8), 1267–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I. (2012). The social media innovation challenge in the public sector. Information Polity, 17(3, 4), 281–292.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mollick, E. (2014). The dynamics of crowdfunding: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalbandian, J., O’Neill, R., Michael, W. J., & Kaufman, A. (2013). Contemporary challenges in local government: Evolving roles and responsibilities, structures, and processes. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 567–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, T. (2012). Citizens’ attitudes toward open government and government 2.0. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 346–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. G., Van Alstyne, M. W., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Platform revolution. WW New York, NY: Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. (2015). Who gets what – And why: The new economics of matchmaking and Market design. Boston, Massachusetts: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Rover, C. (2010). Myoo create wants to teach the world to scheme. Triple Pundit. Retrieved from http://https://www.triplepundit.com/2010/09/myoo-create-wants-to-teach-the-world-to-scheme/
   Google Scholar
• Royo, S., & Yetano, A. (2015). Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: Two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level. Electronic Commerce Research, 15(3), 323–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(3), 125–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seltzer, E., & Mahmoudi, D. (2013). Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: Challenges and opportunities for planning. CPL Bibliography, 28(1), 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1948). Foundations of the theory of organization. American Sociological Review, 13(1), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research: examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Alstyne, M. W., Parker, G. G., & Choudary, S. P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard Business Review, 94(4), 54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirtz, B. W., Daiser, P., & Binkowska, B. (2016). E-participation: A Strategic Framework. International Journal of Public Administration, 41, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, B., Zheng, H., Xu, Y., & Wang, T. (2016). Configurational paths to sponsor satisfaction in crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 915–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetano, A., Royo, S., & Acerete, B. (2010). What is driving the increasing presence of citizen participation initiatives? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(5), 783–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. (1977). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. American Sociological Review, 42, 726–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar