Task Environment Matters for Intra-ministerial Change: The Interaction of International Environment, Organizational and Opportunity Factors

References

• Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The differential empowering effects of Europeanization on the autonomy of national agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304. doi:10.1111/gove.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzer, C., & Humrich, C. (2008). Bildungspolitik. In H. Heinelt & M. Knodt (Eds.), Politikfelder im EU – mehrebenensystem (pp. 271–293). Baden Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, P. (2014). Das Finanz- und Haushaltssystem der Europäischen Union. Grundlagen und Reformen aus der deutschen Perspektive. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS- Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Child, J. (1972). Strategic Structure, Environment and Performance. The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22. doi:10.1177/003803857200600101
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. G. (1997). Interpreting administrative change: Bureaucratic self-interest and institutional inheritance in government. Governance, 10(2), 143–174. doi:10.1111/gove.1997.10.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: Instrument, culture and myth. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derlien, H.-.U. (1996). Zur logik und politik des ressortzuschnitts. Verwaltungsarchiv, 87, 548–580.
   Google Scholar
• Derlien, H.-.U. (2000). Co-ordinating German EU policy. Failing successfully? In H. Kassim, G. B. Peters, & V. Wright (Eds), National co-ordination of EU policy (pp. 54–57). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derlien, H.-.U. (2001). Personalpolitik nach regierungswechse. In H.-.U. Derlien & A. Murswieck (Eds.), Regieren nach wahlen (pp. 39–59). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A., & Toshkov, D. (2007). The dynamics of domestic coordination of EU policy in the new member states: Impossible to lock in? West European Politics, 30(5), 961–986. doi:10.1080/01402380701617381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L. (1996). The normal science of structural contingency theory. Academy of Management Review, 15, 369–381.
   Google Scholar
• Dver, R. (2007). The EU’s foreign, security and defence policies. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics (pp. 23–253). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egan, M. (2007). The Singel market. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics (pp. 253–271). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (1994). Bridging the gap between theory and practice: the case of administrative policy making. Governance, 17, 83–98.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2007). The EU’s social dimension. In M. Cini (Eds.), European Union politics (pp. 271–287). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2001). Privatization or public enterprise reform? Implications for public management, an introduction. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Privatization or public enterprise reform? International case studies with implications for public management (pp. 3–23). Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2002). Organizational theory: from pre-classical to contemporary and critical theories – an overview and appraisal. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations. Theory and practice (pp. 19–63). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. (2008). Agrarpolitik. In H. Heinelt & M. Knodt (Eds.), Politikfelder im EU – mehrebenensystem (pp. 191–213). Baden Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, M. (2007). Wie vollzieht sich der (bürokratische) Wandel von Staatlichkeit? – Das Beispiel der Europäisierung des Mehrebenenverwaltungssystems Deutschlands. TransState Working Papers, (48).
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T. (2013). Ministerialverwaltung im Wandel. Reihe „Staatslehre und politische Verwaltung“. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., Peters, G. B., & Wright, V. (2000). The national Co-ordination of EU policy. Oxford, UK: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., & Ebers, M. (2014). Organisationstheorien. 7. Aktualisierte und überarbeitete Auflage. Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• Kieser, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Organisation. 5. Auflage. Stuttgart, Germany: Schäffer-Poeschel.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1996). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Schnurre –Weiß, X. (2008). Entwicklungspolitik. In H. Heinelt & M. Knodt (Eds.), Politikfelder im EU – mehrebenensystem (pp. 115–141). Baden Baden, Germany: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Laegreid, P., Rolland, V., Roness, P., & Agotnes, J.-E. (2008 June 3–4). The structural anatomy of the Norwegian state 1985–2007: increased specialization or a pendulum shift? Paper presented at the COST meeting, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• MacCarthaigh, M., Roness, P. G., & Sarapuu, K. (2012). Mapping public sector organizations: An agenda for future research. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 844–851. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.715568
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749. doi:10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalowitz, I. (2007). Lobbying in der EU. Stuttgart, Germany: Facultas Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, P., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2014). Institutional effects of changes in political attention – Explaining organizational changes in the top bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 165–189. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakrošis, V., & Budraitis, M. (2012). Longitudinal change in Lithuanian agencies: 1990–2010. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 820–831. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.715566
   Google Scholar
• Page, E. C., & Wouters, L. (1995). The Europeanization of national bureaucracies. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Bureaucracy in the modern state (pp. 185–204). Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2002). Government reorganization: Theory and practice. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Modern organizations. Theory and practice (pp. 159–181). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (1984). Manipulating the machine: Changing the pattern of ministerial departments, 1960–83. London, UK: George & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland, V. W., & Roness, P. G. (2012). Foundings and terminations: Organizational change in the Norwegian state administration 1947–2011. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 783–794. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.715562
   Google Scholar
• Sarapuu, K. (2012). Administrative structure in times of changes: The development of Estonian ministerial departments and government agencies 1990–2010. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(12), 808–819. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.715561
   Google Scholar
• Schamburek, D. (2016). Die Ansiedlung von Aufgaben in der Aufbauorganisation deutscher Landesministerialverwaltungen. Eine handlungstheoretische Erklärung von Organisationsentscheidungen am Beispiel der Migrations- und Integrationspolitik, Dissertation. Bamberg, Germany: University of Bamberg Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1976). Does organization matter? Task structure and interaction in the ministerial bureaucracy. Paper presented to the Workshop on ‘Process, structure and system in public policy – empirical research’ of the ECPR Conference. April 8–14, 1976. Louvain, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1973). Komplexität als Schranke der politischen Planung. In F. Scharpf ( Hrsg.), Planung als politischer Prozeß. Aufsätze zur Theorie der planenden Demokratie (pp. 73–113). Frankfurt a.M, Germany: Suhrkamp, S.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. (2005). Aufgabeneuropäisierung. In G. Schuppert, I. Pernice, & U. Haltern (Eds.), Europawissenschaft (pp. 129–145). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. D. (1967). Organizations in action. Social science basis of administrative theory. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ucarer, E. (2007). Justice and home affairs. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics (pp. 304–321). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urff, W. (1988). Agrar und Fischereipolitik. In W. Weidenfeld & W. Wessels (Eds.), Jahrbuch der Europäischen integration 1988/1989 (pp. 87–98). Bonn, Germany: Europa Union Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Urwin, D. (2007). The European community: From 1945 to 1985. In M. Cini (Eds.), European Union politics (pp. 13–30). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2007). Economic and monetary union. In M. Cini (Ed.), European Union politics (pp. 321–340). New York, US: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walgenbach, P. (2014). Neo-institutionalistische ansätze in der organisationstheorie. In A. Kieser & M. Ebers (Eds.), Organisationstheorien (pp. 295–346). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer.
   Google Scholar
• White, A., & Dunleavy, P. (2010). Making and breaking Whitehall departments: A guide to Machinery of government changes. London, UK: Institute for Government.
   Google Scholar