Street-level Enforcement Style: A Multidimensional Measurement Instrument

References

• Baldwin, R., Scott, C., & Hood, C. (1998). A reader on regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (2012). Trust and public administration. Administration, 60(1), 91–115.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., Walker, J., & Grabosky, P. (1987). An enforcement taxonomy of regulatory agencies. Law & Policy, 9(3), 323–351. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.1987.tb00414.x
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (2003). Dancing with tax authorities: Motivational postures and non-compliant actions. In Taxing democracy: Understanding tax avoidance and evasion (pp. 15–39). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bruijn, H., Ten Heuvelhof, E., & Koopmans, M. (2007). Law enforcement: The game between inspectors and inspectees. Boca Raton, FL: Universal-Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, D. P. (2017). Public, nonprofit, and for-profit sector regulatory approaches in third-party regulatory administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(4), 726–744. doi:10.1093/jopart/muw022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer, N., & Eshuis, J. (in press). A street-level perspective on government transparency and regulatory performance: Does relational distance matter? Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, N., Eshuis, J., & Klijn, E. H. (2018). Does disclosure of performance information influence street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement style? Public Administration Review. doi:10.1111/puar.12926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (Vol. 26). Los Angeles, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, T. J., Baguley, T., & Brunsden, V. (2014). From alpha to omega: A practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. British Journal of Psychology, 105(3), 399–412. doi:10.1111/bjop.12046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, R. S., & Worden, R. E. (2003). Police officers’ attitudes, behavior, and supervisory influences: An analysis of problem solving. Criminology, 41(1), 131–166. doi:10.1111/crim.2003.41.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, J. (2013). Ambiguity and relational signals in regulator–Regulatee relationships. Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 30–47. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01160.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, J. (2014). The politics of detection in business regulation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 257–284. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, Jr., W. T. (1998). Regulatory enforcement styles. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 363–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Knies, E. (2017). Validating a scale for citizen trust in government organizations. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(3), 583–601. doi:10.1177/0020852315585950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. (1984). Environment and enforcement: Regulation and the social definition of pollution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., Hill, M., & Buffat, A. (Eds.). (2016). Understanding street-level bureaucracy. Chicago: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. A. (1994). Regulatory enforcement. Handbook of Regulation and Administrative Law, 383, 383–385.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, W. (2017). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. New York, NY: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy, 30th ann. Ed.: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, C. W. H., Fryxell, G. E., & van Rooij, B. (2009). Changes in enforcement styles among environmental enforcement officials in China. Environment and Planning A, 41(11), 2706–2723. doi:10.1068/a41357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascini, P. (2013). Why was the enforcement pyramid so influential? And what price was paid? Regulation & Governance, 7(1), 48–60. doi:10.1111/rego.12003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascini, P., & Wijk, E. V. (2009). Responsive regulation at the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority: An empirical assessment of assumptions underlying the theory. Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 27–47. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01047.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P., & Burby, R. (1998). Making sense out of regulatory enforcement. Law & Policy, 20(2), 157–182. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00046
   Google Scholar
• May, P., & Winter, S. (2000). Reconsidering styles of regulatory enforcement: Patterns in Danish agro‐environmental inspection. Law & Policy, 22(2), 143–173. doi:10.1111/1467-9930.00089
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. (1999). Regulatory enforcement and compliance: Examining Danish agro-environmental policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 625–651. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199923)18:4<625::AID-PAM5>3.0.CO;2-U
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Winter, S. C. (2011). Regulatory enforcement styles and compliance. In Explaining compliance: Business responses to regulation (pp. 222–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J., & Wood, R. S. (2003). At the regulatory front lines: Inspectors’ enforcement styles and regulatory compliance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 117–139. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., & Musheno, M. (2000). State agent or citizen agent: Two narratives of discretion. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 329–358. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024272
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, L. K. (2010). Dimensions of enforcement style: Factoring in regulatory autonomy and capacity. Law & Policy, 32(1), 61–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. (2007). Differential treatment and Communicative interactions: Why the character of social interaction is important. Law & Policy, 29(2), 257–283. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00255.x
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, V. L. (2015). Law enforcement behaviour of regulatory inspectors. In Understanding Street-Level Bureaucracy (pp. 115–131). Chicago: Polity press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. W., & Fitzpatrick, D. C. (2012). Replication analysis in exploratory factor analysis: What it is and Why it Makes your Analysis Better. Practical Assessment, 17(15), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. C. (2010). Front‐line regulators and their approach to environmental regulation in Southwest Ohio. Review of Policy Research, 27(6), 761–780. doi:10.1111/ropr.2010.27.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. C., & Rinfret, S. R. (2011). Making sense of the front lines: Environmental regulators in Ohio and Wisconsin. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1(4), 277–288. doi:10.1007/s13412-011-0041-0
   Google Scholar
• Pautz, M. C., & Wamsley, C. S. (2012). Pursuing trust in environmental regulatory interactions: The significance of inspectors’ interactions with the regulated community. Administration & Society, 44(7), 853–884. doi:10.1177/0095399711429108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2013). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Posthumus, N. (2015). Hogere boetes voor geknoei met voedsel. Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2015/12/05/hogere-boetes-voor-geknoei-met-voedsel-a1411009
   Google Scholar
• Raaphorst, N. (2018). How to prove, how to interpret and what to do? Uncertainty experiences of street-level tax officials. Public Management Review, 20(4), 485–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiss, A. J. (1984). Consequences of compliance and deterrence models of law enforcement for the exercise of police discretion. Law and Contemporary Problems, 47(4), 83–122. doi:10.2307/1191688
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2014). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. R package version, 1, 1. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, F. (1994). Bureaucracy: A profound puzzle for presidentialism. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of bureaucracy (pp. 97–148). New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Rooij, B., Fryxell, G. E., Lo, C. W. H., & Wang, W. (2013). From support to pressure: The dynamics of social and governmental influences on environmental law enforcement in Guangzhou City, China. Regulation & Governance, 7(3), 321–347. doi:10.1111/rego.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2011). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling and more version 0.4-9 (BETA).
   Google Scholar
• Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107. doi:10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrow, M. K. (2000). The regulatory craft. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Tuijn, S, Janssens, F, Robben, P, & Van Den Bergh, H. (2012). Reducing interrater variability and improving health care: a meta‐analytical review. Journal Of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(4), 887–895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. (2012). Policy alienation of public professionals: The construct and its measurement. Public Administration Review, 72(4), 516–525. doi:10.1111/puar.2012.72.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. L., Bekkers, V., Vink, E., & Musheno, M. (2015). Coping during public service delivery: A conceptualization and systematic review of the literature. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1099–1126. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engen, N., Tummers, L., Bekkers, V., & Steijn, B. (2016). Bringing history in: Policy accumulation and general policy alienation. Public Management Review, 18(7), 1085–1106. doi:10.1080/14719037.2015.1088568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engen, N. A. (2017a). Scale development in public administration research: A review and suggestion for further improvement. Article presented at the 2017 IRSPM annual conference, Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• van Engen, N. A. (2017b). A short measure of general policy alienation: Scale development using a 10‐step procedure. Public Administration, 95(2), 512–526. doi:10.1111/padm.12318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kleef, D., Schott, C., & Steen, T. (2015). Inspections services and inter-rater reliability: Differentiating professional role identities of Dutch veterinary inspectors. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(2), 132–142. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.929589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L., Knies, E., & Brewer, G. A. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job‐centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662–673. doi:10.1111/puar.12569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weel, I. (2017). Slaat voedselwaakhond NVWA wel goed aan? Retrieved August 15, 2017, from https://www.trouw.nl/home/slaat-voedselwaakhond-nvwa-wel-goed-aan-~ab2aaaac
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., & May, P. J. (2002). Information, interests, and environmental regulation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 4(2), 115–142. doi:10.1080/13876980208412675
   Google Scholar
• Winter, S. C., & May, P. J. (2015). Street-level bureaucrats and regulatory deterrence. In Understanding street-level bureaucracy (pp. 133–152). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yee, W. H., Tang, S. Y., & Lo, C. W. H. (2014). Regulatory compliance when the rule of law is weak: Evidence from China’s environmental reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26(1), 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, X., Lo, C. W. H., & Tang, S. Y. (2013). Contextual changes and environmental policy implementation: A longitudinal study of street-level bureaucrats in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(4), 1005–1035. doi:10.1093/jopart/mut004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. (2016). Judicial enforcement deputies: Causes and effects of Chinese judges enforcing environmental administrative decisions. Regulation & Governance, 10(1), 29–43. doi:10.1111/rego.12070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar