Exploring the Relationship between Trust in Government and Citizen Participation

References

• Abramson, P. R., & Finifter, A. W. (1981). On the meaning of political trust: New evidence from items introduced in 1978. American Journal of Political Science, 25(2),297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, B. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 43–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 246–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, G., & Davidov, E. (2011). Can we rate public support for democracy in a comparable way? Cross-national equivalence of democratic attitudes in the World Value Survey. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglio, R. P. (2009). Privatization and vitizen preferences a cross national analysis of demand for private versus public provision of services in three industries. Administration & Society, 41(1), 38–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund, F., Kleven, Ø., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Political activism. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 110–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 271–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, J. (1974). Comment: The political relevance of trust in government. The American Political Science Review, 68(3), 973–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citrin, J., & Luks, S. (2001). Political trust revisited: Déjà vu all over again? In J. Hibbing & E. Theiss-Morse (Eds.), What is it about government that Americans dislike (pp. 9–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coffé, H., & Michels, A. (2014). Education and support for representative, direct and stealth democracy. Electoral Studies, 35, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study item. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, J. V. (1972). Citizen participation in public affairs. Public Administration Review, 32, 589–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenge, democratic choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., Burklin, W. P., & Drummond, A. (2001). Public opinion and direct democracy. Journal of Democracy, 12(4), 141–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011). How general is trust in “most people”? Solving the radius of trust problem. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 786–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyck, J. J. (2009). Initiated distrust: Direct democracy and trust in government. American Politics Research, 37(4), 539–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1965). A system analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Exadaktylos, T., & Zahariadis, N. (2012). Policy implementation and political trust: Greece in the age of austerity (Greece Paper No. 65). London: Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe, Hellenic Observatory Europe Institute, The London School of Economics and Political Science. Europe. U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (1991). Forms of expressing economic discontent. In H. Norpoth, M. S. Lewis-Beck, & J.-D. Lafay (Eds.), Economics and politics: The calculus of support (pp. 267–280). Michigan, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gastil, J., Black, L. W., Deess, E. P., & Leighter, J. (2008). From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Human Communication Research, 34(1), 137–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfinch, S., Gauld, R., & Herbison, P. (2009). The participation divide? political participation, trust in government, and E-government in Australia and New Zealand. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68(3), 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012). Linking transparency, knowledge and citizen trust in government: An experiment. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 50–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M., & Husser, J. (2012). How trust matters: The changing political relevance of political trust. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 312–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (2005). Why trust matters: Declining political trust and the demise of American liberalism. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419–436.
   Google Scholar
• Jen, M. H., Jones, K., & Johnston, R. (2009). Global variations in health: Evaluating Wilkinson’s income inequality hypothesis using the World Values Survey. Social Science and Medicine, 68(4), 643–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., Meuleman, B., & Van De Walle, S. (2015). We need to compare, but how? measurement equivalence in comparative public administration. Public Administration Review, 75(1), 36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi, M. (2007). Assessing government efforts to (re) build trust in government: Challenges and lessons learned from Japanese experiences. International Public Management Review, 8(2), 183–203.
   Google Scholar
• La Due Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social capital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19(3), 567–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-O., Kim, S.-J., & Wainwright, J. (2010). Mad cow militancy: Neoliberal hegemony and social resistance in South Korea. Political Geography, 29(7), 359–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S.-Y., & Whitford, A. B. (2008). Exit, voice, loyalty, and pay: Evidence from the public workforce. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 647–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighley, J., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1092–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 475–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Listhaug, O., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Trust in political institutions. In H. Ervasti, T. Fridberg, M. Hjerm, & K. Ringdal (Eds.), Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective (pp. 131–151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luks, S. (2001). Information and complexity in trust in government. Paper presented at the The Princeton Conference on Trust in Government, Princeton, NJ. http://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Trust2001/luks.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–1241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, E. B. (1984). The great paradox of democratic citizenship and public personnel administration. Public Administration Review, 44, 126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3), 297–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medaglia, R. (2012). eParticipation research: Moving characterization forward (2006–2011). Government Information Quarterly, 29(3), 346–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E. (1980). Disinterest, disaffection, and participation in presidential politics. Political Behavior, 2(1), 7–32.
   Google Scholar
• Morrel, M. E. (2005). Deliberation, democratic decision-making and internal political efficacy. Political Behavior, 27(1), 49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T. (2010). Why public administration should take deliberative democracy seriously. In R. O’Leary, D. Van Slyke, & S. Kim (Eds.), The future of public administration around the world. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neblo, M. A., Esterling, K. M., Kennedy, R. P., Lazer, D. M. J., & Sokhey, A. E. (2010). Who wants to deliberate—And why? American Political Science Review, 104(3), 566–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. D. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 267–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, B. J., Johnson, J., & Lown, P. L. (2014). The “Daily grind”: Work, commuting, and their impact on political participation. American Politics Research, 42(1), 141–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (1999). Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 257–272). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. J., Putnam, R. D., & Dalton, R. J. (2000). A quarter-century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy, 11(2), 5–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincock, H. (2012). Does deliberation make better citizens?”. In T. Nabatchi, J. Gastil, G. M. Weiksner, & M. Leighninger (Eds.), Democracy in motion (pp. 135–162). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plutzer, E. (2002). Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 41–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Trust and taxpaying: Testing the heuristic approach to collective action. American Journal of Political Science, 42(2),398–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare: Policy design, political learning, and political action. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, C. S., Chang, P. Y., & Lim, Y. (2012). Spill up and spill over of trust: An extended test of cultural and institutional theories of trust in South Korea. Sociological Forum, 27(2), 504–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science, 8, 227–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timpone, R. J. (1998). Structure, behavior, and voter turnout in the United States. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (2010). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. G. (2007). Gendering municipal government: Female descriptive representation and feelings of political trust. Social Science Quarterly, 88(5), 1106–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1987). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Illinois, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? what do they say? American Political Science Review, 87(2), 303–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagle, U. R. (2006). Political participation and civic engagement in Kathmandu: An empirical analysis with structural equations. International Political Science Review, 27(3), 301–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Van Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 67(2), 265–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, P. (2013). Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research, 52(6), 747–772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., & Pandey, S. K. (2011). Further dissecting the black box of citizen participation: When does citizen involvement lead to good outcomes? Public Administration Review, 71(6), 880–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar