The New Era of Stakeholder Engagement: Gaining, Maintaining, and Repairing Legitimacy in Nonprofit Organizations

References

• Abzug, R., & Galaskiewicz, J. (2001). Nonprofit boards: Crucibles of expertise or symbols of local identities? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(1), 51–73. doi:10.1177/0899764001301003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AccountAbility (2015). AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard. http://www.accountability.org/images/content/5/4/542/AA1000SES%202010%20PRINT.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ACRI (2016). 21st Report on foundations of banking origin. Year 2015. Rome, Italy: ACRI.
   Google Scholar
• Anheier, H. K. (2001). Foundations in Europe: A comparative perspective. Civil Society Working Paper series, 18. Centre for Civil Society, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ashforth, B., & Gibbs, B. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151–179. doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boesso, G., Cerbioni, F., Menini, A., & Parbonetti, A. (2017). The role of the board in shaping foundations’ strategy: An empirical study. Journal of Management and Governance 21, 375–397. doi:10.1007/s10997-016-9348-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2005). Organizational legitimacy, capacity, and capacity development. European Centre for Development Policy Management, Discussion paper No 58A.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. D., Cohen, D., Edwards, M., Eigen, P., Heinrich, F., Martin, N. (2001). Civil Society Legitimacy: A Discussion Guide. In L. Brown, (Ed.). Practice-Research Engagement and Civil Society in a Globalizing World (pp. 63–79). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. A. (2002). Inclusive governance practices in nonprofit organizations and implications for practice. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 12(4), 369–385. doi:10.1002/nml.v12:4
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H., Paine, A. E., Alcock, P., Kendall, J., & Macmillan, R. (2014). Who’s speaking for whom? Exploring issues of third sector leadership, leverage and legitimacy. Working paper 121, TSRC, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, K. (2007). Citizen participation: Models and methods. International Journal of Public Administration, 30, 1179–1196. doi:10.1080/01900690701225366
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R., & Lowndes, V. (2014). Searching for authenticity? Understanding representation in network governance: The case of faith engagement. Public Administration, 92(2), 274–290. doi:10.1111/padm.12067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaskin, R. J. (2003). Fostering neighborhood democracy: Legitimacy and accountability within loosely coupled systems. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 161–189. doi:10.1177/0899764003032002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhury, E., & Ahmed, S. (2002). The shifting meaning of governance: Public accountability of third sector organizations in an emergent global regime. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(4), 561–588. doi:10.1081/PAD-120013256
   Google Scholar
• Cnaan, R. A. (1991). Neighborhood-representing organizations: How democratic are they? Social Service Review, 65(4), 614–634. doi:10.1086/603878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, C., Hyndman, N., & McConville, D. (2015). UK charity accounting. In Z. Hoque & L. Parker (Eds), Performance management in nonprofit organizations: Global perspectives (pp. 155–182). New York & London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, S. L., O’Keefe, P. A., & Hrasky, S. L. (2015). Legitimacy, accountability and impression management in NGOs: The Indian Ocean tsunami. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1075–1098. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-01007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornforth, C. (2004). The governance of co-operatives and mutual associations: A paradox perspective. Annals of Public and Co-Operative Economics, 75(1), 11–32. doi:10.1111/apce.2004.75.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Dart, R. (2004). The legitimacy of social enterprise. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14(4), 411–424. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1542-7854
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. doi:10.2307/1388226
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2009). Placing the normative logics of accountability in “thick” perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(6), 885–904. doi:10.1177/0002764208327664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2010). The many faces of nonprofit accountability. Harward Business School, Working paper 10-069.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman Trust (2016). Edelman Trust barometer 2007. http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2016-edelman-trust-barometer/
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4308385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsbach, K., & Sutton, R. (1992). Acquiring organizational legitimacy through illegitimate actions: A marriage of institutional and impression management theories. The Academy of Management Journal, 35(4), 699–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enright, P., & Bourns, C. (2010). The case for stakeholder engagement. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(2), 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound governance in the age of globalization: A conceptual framework. In A. Farazmand (Ed), Sound governance: Policy and administration innovation (pp. 1–24). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2009). Globalization and public administration. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522. doi:10.2307/3110299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2013). Governance in the age of globalization: Challenges and opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. Public Organization Review, 13(4), 349–363. doi:10.1007/s11115-013-0249-4
   Google Scholar
• Follman, J., Cseh, M., & Brudney, J. L. (2016). Structures, challenges, and successes of volunteer programs co‐managed by nonprofit and public organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 26(4), 453–470. doi:10.1002/nml.2016.26.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, B. (2010). Promoting civil society in Third Sector organizations through participatory management patterns. European Management Journal, 28, 403–412. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnan, L., Hinna, A., Monteduro, F., & Scarozza, D. (2013). Corporate governance and management practices: Stakeholder involvement, quality and sustainability tools adoption. Evidences in local public utilities. Journal of Management and Governance, 17, 907–937. doi:10.1007/s10997-011-9201-6
   Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Musso, J. A. (2007). Representation in nonprofit and voluntary organizations: A conceptual framework. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 308–326. doi:10.1177/0899764006289764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, C., & Zhang, Z. (2013). Mapping the representational dimensions of non-profit organizations in China. Public Administration, 91(2), 325–346. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01994.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S., & Mort, M. (1998). Which champions, which people? Public and user involvment in health care as a technology of legitimation. Social Policy & Administration, 32(1), 60–70. doi:10.1111/1467-9515.00086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinna, A., & Monteduro, F. (2016). Boards, governance and value creation in grant-giving foundations. Journal of Management and Governance. doi:10.1007/s10997-016-9370-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque, Z., & Parker, L. (2015). Accountability, governance and performance management in nonprofit organizations. In Z. Hoque & L. Parker (Eds.), Performance Management in Nonprofit Organizations: Global Perspectives (pp. 3–16). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hybels, R. C. (1995). On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: A critical review and integrative theoretical model. Academy of Management Journal, Best Papers Proceedings, 241–245. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536509
   Google Scholar
• Iecovich, E. (2005). The profile of board membership in Israeli voluntary organizations. Voluntas, 16(2), 161–180. doi:10.1007/s11266-005-5696-2
   Google Scholar
• Jassaud, N. (2014). Reforming the corporate governance of Italian banks. IMF Working Paper, WP/14/181. 10.5089/9781484387511.001
   Google Scholar
• Jreisat, J. (2004). Governance in a Globalizing World. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(13–14), 1003–1029. doi:10.1081/PAD-200039883
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. H., & Edelenbos, J. (2012). The influence of democratic legitimacy on outcomes in governance networks. Administration & Society, 45(6), 627–650. doi:10.1177/0095399712454113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leardini, C., Rossi, G., & Moggi, S. (2014). Board governance in bank foundations. London, UK: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Leardini, C., Rossi, G., Moggi, S., & Zardini, A. (2017). When the law shapes nonprofit boards. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 46(1), 47–70. doi:10.1177/0899764016634891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2016). What encourages nonprofits’ adoption of good governance policies? Nonprofit Leadership and Management, 27(1), 95–112. doi:10.1002/nml.21226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. K. (1994). The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspectives on Accounting Conference, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Lister, S. (2003). NGO legitimacy. Technical issue or social construct? Critique of Anthropology, 23(2), 175–192. doi:10.1177/0308275X03023002004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayan, M. J. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. California, CA: Left Coast Press, Walnut.
   Google Scholar
• Mercelis, F., Wellens, L., & Jegers, M. (2016). Beneficiary participation in non-governmental development organisations: A case study in Vietnam. The Journal of Development Studies, 52(10), 1446–1462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. A methods sourcebook. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller G. (1997). Contexttualizing texts: Studying organizational texts. In G. Miller & R. Dingwall Eds, Context and method in qualitative research Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. doi:10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moggi, S. 2017. Focus groups in social accounting as a stakeholder engagement tool. In D. Crowther, L. Lauesen (Eds.). Handbook of Research Methods in Corporate Social Responsibility (pp: 364–376). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moggi, S., Leardini, C., & Rossi, G. (2015). Mandatory or not mandatory reporting? Insights from Italian bank foundations. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(10), 734–742. doi:10.1080/01900692.2014.969842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moggi, S., Leardini, C., Rossi, G., & Zardini, A. (2016). Meeting local community needs. A dashboard from the stakeholder engagement experience. Vita e Pensiero, Working paper n. 16.
   Google Scholar
• Murtaza, N. (2012). Putting the lasts first: The case for community-focused and peer-managed NGO accountability mechanisms. Voluntas, 23, 109–125. doi:10.1007/s11266-011-9181-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO). (2010). Code of Good Governance. NCVO.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2002). Managerial perceptions of corporate social disclosure: An Irish story. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 406–436. doi:10.1108/09513570210435898
   Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B. (2005). Stakeholder democracy: Challenges and contributions from social accounting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 4(1), 28–41. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2005.00384.x
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L., & Hoque, Z. (2015). Boardroom governance. Interrogating, strategising, control and accountability processes. In Z. Hoque & L. Parker (Eds.), Performance management in nonprofit organizations: Global perspectives (pp. 260–284). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3th). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. California, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragab, I., Blum, A., & Murphy, M. (1981). Representation in neighborhood organizations. Social Development Issues, 5(2–3), 62–73.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, G., Leardini, C., Moggi, S., & Campedelli, B. (2015). Toward community engagement in non-profit organizations governance. Voluntary Sector Review, 6(1), 21–39. doi:10.1332/204080515X14251102462737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulston, K. (2010). Reflective interviewing: A guide to theory and practice. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soobaroyen, T., & Devi, M. J. (2016). Community disclosures in a developing country: Insights from a neo-pluralist perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(3), 452–482. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2012). Multiple-case study methods in governance-related research. Public Management Review, 14(1), 67–82. doi:10.1080/14719037.2011.589618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson, L. A. (2013). A strategic engagement framework for nonprofits. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 23(3), 303–323. doi:10.1002/nml.v23.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindell, D. (2000). Issue representation in neighborhood organizations: Questing for democracy at the grassroots. Journal of Urban Affairs, 22(2), 123–137. doi:10.1111/0735-2166.00046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., & Warburton, D. (2003). Legitimacy and the role of uk third sector organizations in the policy process. Voluntas, 14(3), 321–338. doi:10.1023/A:1025618720650
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., & Van Wart, M. (2007). When public participation in administration leads to trust: An empirical assessment of managers’ perceptions. Public Administration Review, 265–278. March/April. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00712.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. (2004). Analysis of documents and records. In U. Flick, E. Von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 284–289). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research. Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 5. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar