What Drives For-Profit and Nonprofit Organizations’ Entry into Voucher Markets?

References

• Aligica, P. D. (2016). Neither market nor state domain: Nonprofits from the Ostroms’ theoretical perspective. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 1–18. doi:10.1177/0899764016651727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, F. O., & Ford, M. (2017). Entry barriers and nonprofit founding rates: An examination of the milwaukee voucher school population. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8(1), 71–90. doi:10.1515/npf-2016-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, K. B., & Sohn, H. (2017). Factors contributing to the size of nonprofit sector: Tests of government failure, interdependence, and social capital theory. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(3), 470–480.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, J. P. (2008). Do nonprofit and government nursing homes enter unprofitable markets? Economic Inquiry, 46(2), 241–260. doi:10.1111/ecin.2008.46.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63, 391–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.1992.tb02098.x
   Google Scholar
• Bielefeld, W., & Murdoch, J. C. (2004). The locations of nonprofit organizations and their for-profit counterparts: An exploratory analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(1), 221–246. doi:10.1177/0899764003260589
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., & Potoski, M. (2003). Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(4), 441–468. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarty, S., Gaynor, M., Klepper, S., & Vogt, W. B. (2006). Does the profit motive make Jack nimble? Ownership form and the evolution of the U.S. hospital industry. Health Economics, 15, 345–361. doi:10.1002/hec.1111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. S., Koh, D. Y., & Park, M. S. (2013). The Introduction of the e-voucher system and market structure changes in the mother-infant help service market. The Korean Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(3), 25–61.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J. J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 296–314. doi:10.1177/0899764099283004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, R. J., & Trebilcock, M. J. (2005). Rethinking the welfare state: The prospects for government by voucher. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., Henry, A. N., Nyssens, S., & Nyssens, M. (2010). Dose the mission of providers matter on a quasi-market?: The case of the Belgian ‘Service Voucher’ scheme. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 81(4), 583–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00423.x
   Google Scholar
• Downes, T., & Greenstein, S. M. (2002). Entry into the schooling market, How is the behaviour of private organizations influenced by public sector decisions? Bulletin of Economic Research, 54(4), 341–371. doi:10.1111/1467-8586.00156
   Google Scholar
• Glomm, G., Harris, D., & Lo, T.-F. (2005). Charter school location. Economics of Education Review, 24(4), 451–457. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706. doi:10.1177/0899764001304004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–893. doi:10.2307/796089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Im, T. (2003). Bureaucratic Power and the NPM Reforms in Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 89–102. doi:10.1080/12294659.2003.10805020
   Google Scholar
• Jung, K. (2007). An analysis of voucher programs in South Korea and the United States. Korean Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 61–109.
   Google Scholar
• Kähkönen, L. (2005). Costs and efficiency of quasi-markets in practice. Local Government Studies, 31(1), 85–97. doi:10.1080/0300393042000332873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, P. S. (2000). Administrative reform in the Korean central government: A case study of the Dae Jung Kim administration. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(2), 145–160. doi:10.2307/3381265
   Google Scholar
• King, E. M., Orazem, P. F., & Wohlgemuth, D. (1999). Central mandates and local incentives: The Colombia education voucher program. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 467–491. doi:10.1093/wber/13.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutsen, W. L. (2012). Value as a self-sustaining mechanism: Why some nonprofit organizations are different from and similar to private and public organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(5), 985–1005. doi:10.1177/0899764012457244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushman, J. E. (1979). A three-sector model of day care center services. The Journal of Human Resource, 14(4), 543–562. doi:10.2307/145323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, I., & Park, S. (2018). Public–private mixed delivery and information effects. Economica, 85(337), 75–91. doi:10.1111/ecca.2018.85.issue-337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamothe, M., & Lamothe, S. (2011). To trust or not to trust? What matters in local government-vendor relationships? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 867–892. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Grand, J. (1991). Quasi-markets and social policy. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1256–1267. doi:10.2307/2234441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2012). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 189–214. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. B. (2015). What causes nonprofit organizations’ entry into the social service sector: Evidence from Korea’s voucher program for the elderly and the disadvantaged. Korean Public Administration Review, 49(2), 347–372. doi:10.18333/KPAR.49.2.347
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. B. (2017). Applying a voucher market in a local municipality: Competition and fiscal capacity in the Korean elderly program. International Review of Public Administration, 22(1), 32–44. doi:10.1080/12294659.2017.1292042
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. B., & Park, S. (2011). The effect of distance and ownership of provider on household choice in social service voucher market: An empirical analysis of the maternity home care voucher market in Korea. The Journal of Korean Association for Policy Studies, 20(4), 371–399.
   Google Scholar
• Leroux, K. M. (2005). What drives nonprofit entrepreneurship? A look at budget trends of metro Detroit social service agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 35(4), 350–362. doi:10.1177/0275074005278813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsunaga, Y., & Yamauchi, N. (2004). Is the government failure theory still relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(2), 227–263. doi:10.1111/apce.2004.75.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2008). Information about the postpartum voucher program, Ministry of Health and Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, E. C., & Staiger, D. O. (1994). How hospital ownership affects access to care for the uninsured. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(1), 171–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-López, G., Prior, D., & Zafra-Gómez, J. L. (2015). Rethinking new public management delivery forms and efficiency: Long-term effects in Spanish local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(4), 1157–1183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pop, D., & Radu, R. (2013). Challenges to local authorities under EU structural funds: Evidence from mixed quasi-markets for public service provision in Romania. Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(6), 1108–1123. doi:10.1111/jcms.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1996). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally’. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248. doi:10.1023/A:1022058200985
   Google Scholar
• Twombly, E. C. (2003). What factors affect the entry and exit of nonprofit human service organization in metropolitan areas? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(2), 211–223. doi:10.1177/0899764003032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E., & Gradus, R. H. (2011). The consequences of implementing a child care voucher scheme: Evidence from Australia, the Netherlands and the USA. Social Policy & Administration, 45(5), 569–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisbord, B. A. (1997). The future of the nonprofit sector: Its entwining with private enterprise and government. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 16(4), 541–555. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(199723)16:4<541::AID-PAM2>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, -J.-J. (2013). Parochial welfare politics and the small welfare state in South Korea. Comparative Politics, 45(4), 457–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwanziger, J., Mukamel, D. B., & Indridason, I. (2002). Use of resident-origin data to define nursing home market boundaries. Inquiry, 39(1), 56–66. doi:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_39.1.56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar