Understanding Migration: The Case for Public Administration

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2005). Unbundling institutions. Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), 949–995. doi:10.1086/432166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adepoju, A., Boulton, A., & Levin, M. (2010). Promoting integration through mobility: Free movement under ecowas. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(3), 120–144. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdq032
   Google Scholar
• Alpes, M. J., & Spire, A. (2014). Dealing with law in migration control: The powers of street-level bureaucrats at French consulates. Social & Legal Studies, 23(2), 261–274. doi:10.1177/0964663913510927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G., O’Toole, L., Meier, K., & Walker, R. (2013). Managing migration? Eu enlargement, local government capacity and performance in England. Public Administration, 91(1), 174–194. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02043.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, P. A. (2010). National approaches to the administration of international migration: Introduction: Administrative history as policy analysis. In P. A. Arnold (Ed.), National approaches to the administration of international migration (Vol. 31, pp. 1–7). Amsterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashutosh, I., & Mountz, A. (2012). The geopolitics of migrant mobility: Tracing state relations through refugee claims, boats, and discourses. Geopolitics, 17(2), 335–354. doi:10.1080/14650045.2011.567315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. (2013). Public encounters: The history and future of face-to-face contact between public professionals and citizens. Public Administration, 91(2), 469–483. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. R. (2015). Communicative capacity: Public encounters in participatory theory and practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belabas, W., & Gerrits, L. (2017). Going the extra mile? How street-level bureaucrats deal with the integration of immigrants. Social Policy & Administration, 51(1), 133–150. doi:10.1111/spol.12184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, A., & Collier, P. (2017). Refuge: Rethinking refugee policy in a changing world (1st ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolderson, H. (2011). The ethics of welfare provision for migrants: A case for equal treatment and the repositioning of welfare. Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 219–235. doi:10.1017/S0047279410000899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. (2012). How information scarcity influences the policy agenda: Evidence from U.K. immigration policy. Governance, 25(3), 367–389. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01570.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, S., & Ramírez de la Cruz, E. E. (2017). Controlling administrative discretion promotes social equity? Evidence from a natural experiment. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 80–89. doi:10.1111/puar.12590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington, W. J. (2013). Brain drain revisited: The economic impact of immigration | Harvard international review. Retrieved from http://hir.harvard.edu/article/?a=10388
   Google Scholar
• Castles, S., De Haas, H., & Miller, M. J. (2013). The age of migration, fifth edition: International population movements in the modern world (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, P., & Krogstad, J. M. (2018, July 5). For the first time, U.S. resettles fewer refugees than the rest of the world. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/07/05/for-the-first-time-u-s-resettles-fewer-refugees-than-the-rest-of-the-world/
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2013, February 14). Policy | Where we stand: Immigration. Retrieved from http://www.conservatives.com/Policy/Where_we_stand/Immigration.aspx
   Google Scholar
• De Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2009.00804.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, V. (2010). The bureaucrat and the poor: Encounters in French welfare offices. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dwyer, P. (2005). Governance, forced migration and welfare. Social Policy & Administration, 39(6), 622–639. doi:10.1111/j.14679515.2005.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlins, M., & Larrison, J. (2018). Street-level bureaucrats and the governance of unaccompanied migrant children. Public Policy and Administration. doi:10.1177/0952076718811438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EuroStat. (2018, April 19). Asylum decisions in the EU. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/8817675/3-19042018-AP-EN.pdf/748e8fae-2cfb-4e75-a388-f06f6ce8ff58
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat - Data Explorer. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=migr_eipre&lang=en
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P., & Rauch, J. E. (1999). Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review, 64(5), 748–765. doi:10.2307/2657374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (1999). Predatory globalization. A critique. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (1999). Globalization and public administration on JSTOR. Public Administration Review, 59(6), 509–522. doi:10.2307/3110299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farazmand, A. (2017). Ethics and accountability in the age of predatory globalization. An impossibility theorem? In C. L. Jurkiewicz & R. A. Giacalone (Eds.), Radical thoughts on ethical leadership (pp. 199–220). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fayol, H. (1949). General principles of management. In C. Storrs (Ed.), General and industrial management. London, UK: Pittman.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson, G. (2005). The state of social equity in American public administration. National Civic Review, 94(4), 31–38. doi:10.1002/ncr.117
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (2014). Political order and political decay. From the industrial revolution to the globalization of democracy. New York, NY: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, A., & McAuliffe, M. (2016). Migrant Smuggling Data and Research: A global review of the emerging evidence base. Geneva: International Organization for Migration. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/books/migrant-smuggling-data-and-research-global-review-emerging-evidence-base
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, S. M. (2000). That’s not what we meant to do: Reform and its unintended consequences in the twentieth century. New York, NY: W W Norton & Co Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N. (2013). The transnational migration paradigm: Global perspectives on migration research. Migration and organized civil society: Rethinking national policy (pp. 25–43). doi:10.4324/9780203103821
   Google Scholar
• Gooden, S. T. (2014). Race and social equity: A nervous area of government. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, J. S., & Pierson, P. (2016). American Amnesia. How the war on government led us to forget what made American prosper. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, J. (2013). The politics of immigration: Contradictions of the liberal state. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, G. H. (2008). The economic consequences of the international migration of labor. NBER Working Papers 14490, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w14490 doi:10.3386/w14490
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y., & Steinmetz, D. (1981). Client-Official encounters in social service agencies. In C. T. Goodsell (Ed.), The public encounter: Where state and citizen meet (pp. 83–101). Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, A. (2009). Neighbourhood environmental services and neighbourhood ‘effects’: Exploring the role of urban services in intensifying neighbourhood problems. Housing Studies, 24(4), 503–524. doi:10.1080/02673030902938389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbst, J. (2011). States and power in africa: Comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollifield, J. (2004). The emerging migration state. International Migration Review, 38(3), 885–912. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00223.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2011). Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy & Politics, 39(2), 163–186. doi:10.1332/030557310X519650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Y., Ni, A. Y., Poocharoen, O., Yang, K., & Zhao, Z. J. (2011). The case for public administration with a global perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 21(1), i45–i51. doi:10.1093/jopart/muq070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Migration. (2015). How the world views migration. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from https://publications.iom.int/system/files/how_the_world_gallup.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jung, T. (2010). Citizens, co-producers, customers, clients, captives? A critical review of consumerism and public services. Public Management Review, 12(3), 439–446. doi:10.1080/14719031003787940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. (2009). International migration: The human side of globalisation. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Keiser, L. (2003). The determinants of street-level bureaucratic behavior: Gate-keeping in the social security disability program. Presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Georgetown University, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, M. (2012, June 2). Explainer: What is Mercosur? Retrieved from http://www.as-coa.org/articles/explainer-what-mercosur-0
   Google Scholar
• Kontunen, K., Rijks, B., Motus, N., Iodice, J., Schultz, C., & Mosca, D. (2014). Ensuring health equity of marginalized populations: Experiences from mainstreaming the health of migrants. Health Promotion International, 29(suppl_1), i121. doi:10.1093/heapro/dau042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koser, K. (2007). International migration: A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kritz, M. M., Lim, L. L., & Zlotnik, H. (1992). International migration systems: A global approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krogstad, J. M., Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2017, April 27). 5 facts about illegal immigration in the U.S. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/27/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/
   Google Scholar
• Larrison, J., Raadschelders, J. C. N., & Thapar, A. V. (2019). Refugee migration as wicked problem: Controlling, palliative and governance policies in the United States. World Affairs Journal, 2019, Fall. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, P. (2001). Transnational migration: Taking stock and future directions. Global Networks, 1(3), 195–216. doi:10.1111/glob.2001.1.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebert, S. (2010). The role of informal institutions in U.S. Immigration Policy: The case of illegal labor migration from Kyrgyzstan. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 390–400. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban Affairs Quarterly, 6(4), 391–409. doi:10.1177/107808747100600401
   Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Lokshin, M., Bontch-Osmolovski, M., & Glinskaya, E. (2011). Work-related migration and poverty reduction in Nepal. In Migration and Poverty: Towards better opportunities for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://proxy-ub.researchport.umd.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=buh&AN=64994452&site=eds-live
   Google Scholar
• Manning, P., & Trimmer, T. (2013). Migration in world history. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (2006). Managing labor migration: Temporary worker programs for the 21st century. Presented at the International Symposium on International Migration and Development, Turin, Italy. Retrieved fromhttps://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/other/turin/P07_Martin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Martin, P. (2011). Mexico–US migration, NAFTA and CAFTA, and US immigration policy. In R. Hansen, J. Koehler, and J. Money (Eds.), Migration, nation states, and international cooperation (pp. 75–86). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S. (1999). International migration at the dawn of the twenty-first century: The role of the state. Population and Development Review, 25(2), 303–322. doi:10.1111/padr.1999.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1999). Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Money, J. (1999). Fences and neighbors: The political geography of immigration control (1st ed.). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgen, S. (2001). The agency of welfare workers: Negotiating devolution, privatization, and the meaning of self-sufficiency. American Anthropologist, 103(3), 747–761. doi:10.1525/aa.2001.103.3.747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murrugarra, E., & Herrera, C. (2011). Migration choices, inequality of opportunities, and poverty reduction in Nicaragua. In E. Murrugarra, J. Larrison, and M. Sasin (Eds.), Migration and poverty: Toward better opportunities for the poor (pp. 101–124). Washington, DC, US: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Murrugarra, E., Larrison, J., & Sasin, M. J. (2011). Migration and poverty: Toward better opportunities for the poor. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808678
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, L. (2009). The role of advocacy in shaping immigrant education: A California case study. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 817–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozkul, D. (2012). Transnational migration research. Sociopedia,Isa. doi:10.1177/2056846012111
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prottas, J. M. (1979). People processing: The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, S. S. (2002, November 1). Refugees: Risks and challenges worldwide. Retrieved from https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/refugees-risks-and-challenges-worldwide
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. (2011). High-skilled immigrants: How satisfied are foreign-born scientists and engineers employed at American Universities? Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31(2), 143–170. doi:10.1177/0734371X11408572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabharwal, M. (2013). Introduction: Immigration and its impact on human capital development. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 15(4), 293–296. doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.812775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (2017). Predatory formations dress in wall street suits and algorithmic math. Science, Technology & Society, 22(1), 1–15. doi:10.1177/0971721816682783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63. doi:10.2307/3317464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. doi:10.2307/2939044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal, U., Elliott, D., & Mayadas, S. (2010). Immigration worldwide. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388138.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T. (1979). States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511815805
   Google Scholar
• Soifer, H., & Vom Hau, M. (2008). Unpacking the strength of the state: The utility of state infrastructural power. Studies in Comparative International Development, 43, 219–230. doi:10.1007/s12116-008-9030-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soss, J. (1999). Lessons of welfare. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 363–380. doi:10.2307/2585401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, S. (2011). The Migration Debate. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality. How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York, Ny: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Moloney, K. (Eds.). (2019). The oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. (2005). From border control to migration management: The case for a paradigm change in the western response to transborder population movement. Social Policy & Administration, 39(6), 563–586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2005.00457.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (2007). Democracy (1st ed.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torpey, J. (1999). The invention of the passport: Surveillance, citizenship and the state. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (n.d.). H-2A temporary agricultural workers. Retrieved from https://www.uscis.gov/working-united-states/temporary-workers/h-2a-temporary-agricultural-workers
   Google Scholar
• United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2018, September 26). Figures at a glance. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/figures-at-a-glance.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). Trends in international migrant stock: The 2017 revision. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/data/estimates2/estimates17.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (2000). Migration control in Germany and the United States. International Migration Review, 34(2), 390–422. doi:10.1177/019791830003400202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. M. (2015). Beyond enforcement: Welcomeness, local law enforcement, and immigrants. Public Administration Review, 75(3), 433–442. doi:10.1111/puar.12335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, V. (2011). Interstate cooperation in migration management in the South African Development Community (SADC). In R. Hansen, J. Koehler, and J. Money (Eds.), Migration, nation states, and internation cooperation (pp. 149–168). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, C. F. (2014). How do states implement liberal immigration policies? Control signals and skilled immigration reform in Australia. Governance, 27(3), 397–421. doi:10.1111/gove.12043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar