498
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Infrastructure Provision on the Margins: An Assessment of Broadband Delivery UK

, &

References

  • Abdelkader Benmansour, N. (2016). Public–Private partnership in Tunisia: Enfidha airport assessment of an infrastructure achievement. International Journal of Public Administration, 39(7), 552–562. doi:10.1080/01900692.2015.1004087
  • Alizadeh, T., Grubesic, T. H., & Helderop, E. (2017). Urban governance and big corporations in the digital economy: An investigation of socio-spatial implications of Google Fiber in Kansas City. Teleamtics & Informatics, 34, 973–986. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.04.007
  • Alizadeh, T., Sipe, N., & Dodson, J. (2014). Spatial planning and high-speed broadband: Australia’s National broadband network and metropolitan planning. International Planning Studies, 19(3–4), 359–378. doi:10.1080/13563475.2014.965248
  • Araújo, S., & Sutherland, D. (2010). Public-private partnerships and investment in infrastructure OECD Economics Department Working Papers, Number 803, Paris, France: OECD Publishing
  • Bauer, J. (2005). Regulation and state ownership: Conflicts and complementarities in EU telecommunications. Annals of Public & Cooperative Economics, 76(2), 151–177. doi:10.1111/apce.2005.76.issue-2
  • Beltrán, F. (2014). Fibre-to-the-home, high-speed and national broadband plans: Tales from down under. Telecommunications Policy, 38(9), 715–729. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2013.08.006
  • BIS & DCMS. (2010, December). Britain’s superfast broadband future. Department for Business, Innovation & Skills and Department of Culture, Media & Sport Retrieved from www.gov.uk
  • Briglauer, W., Holzleitner, C., & Vogelsang, I. (2016). The need for more efficient public funding of new communications infrastructure in EU member states. Information Economics and Policy, 36, 26–35. doi:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2016.07.002
  • Broadband Commission for Sustainable Development. (2017). The state of broadband 2017. Broadband catalyzing sustainable development. Geneva, Switzerland: ITU.
  • Cave, M., & Artin, I. (2010). Motives and means for public investment in nationwide next generation networks. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 505–512. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.07.003
  • Culture, Media & Sport Committee. (2016). Establishing world-class connectivity throughout the UK, second report of session 2016–17. House of Commons, Retrieved from http//:www.parliament.uk
  • Davidson, C. L., & Santorelli, M. (2014). Understanding the debate over government-owned broadband networks: Context, lessons learned, and a way forward for policy makers. Advanced Communications Law & Policy Institute, New York Law School, Retrieved from http//:www.nyls.edu
  • Department for Culture, Media & Sport. (2011, September). Broadband delivery programme: Delivery model. Retrieved from www.gov.uk
  • Department for Culture, Media & Sport. (2015, November 7). Government plan to make sure no one is left behind on broadband access. Retrieved from http//:www.gov.uk
  • Department for Culture, Media & Sport. (2016, February). Emerging findings from the BDUK market test pilots. Retrieved from http//:www.gov.uk
  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012, March). Full speed ahead – the government broadband report Q1 2012. London, UK: EIU.
  • Elgot, J. (2017, December 20). High-speed broadband to be legal right for UK homes and businesses. The Guardian, Retrieved from www.theguardian.com
  • European Commission. (2012, November 20). State Aid SA.33671 (2012/N) – United Kingdom. National Broadband Scheme for the UK – Broadband Delivery UK. C(20112) 8223 final, Brussels. Belgium.
  • European Commission. (2013a, January 26). EU guidelines for the application of state aid rules in relation to the rapid deployment of broadband networks. C25/1. Brussels, Belgium.
  • European Commission. (2013b, March 26). The socio-economic impact of bandwidth. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu
  • European Commission. (2016, May 26). SA.40720 (2016/N) – National broadband scheme for the UK 2016–2020. C(2016) 3208 final. Brussels, Belgium.
  • Falch, M., & Henten, A. (2010). Public private partnerships as a tool for stimulating investments in broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 496–504. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.07.010
  • Fiveash, K. (2013, March 18). Fujitsu pulls a muscle, drops out of face for £530m broadband pot. The Register, Retrieved from www.theregister.co.uk
  • Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., & Boyer, E. (2010). Public-private partnerships and the public accountability question. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 475–484. doi:10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6210
  • Gerli, P., Wainwright, D., & Whalley, J. (2017). Infrastructure investment on the margins of the market: The role of niche infrastructure providers in the UK. Telecommunications Policy, 41(9), 743–756. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.03.005
  • Gillett, S. E., Lehr, W. H., & Osorio, C. A. (2004). Local government broadband initiatives. Telecommunications Policy, 28(7–8), 537–558. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2004.05.001
  • Girard, P., Mohr, R. D., Deller, S. C., & Halstead, J. M. (2009). Public-private partnerships and cooperative agreements in municipal service delivery. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(5), 370–392. doi:10.1080/01900690902827267
  • Gómez-Barroso, J. L., & Feijoo, C. (2010). A conceptual framework for public-private interplay in the telecommunications sector. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 487–495. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.01.001
  • Gómez-Barroso, J. L., & Pérez-Martínez, J. (2005). Public intervention in the access to advanced telecommunication services: Assessing its theoretical economic basis. Government Information Quarterly, 22(3), 489–504. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2005.08.001
  • Grubesic, T. H., Helderop, E., & Alizadeh, T. (2019). Closing information asymmetries: A scale agnostic approach for exploring equity implications of broadband provision. Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 50–66. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.04.002
  • Hauge, J. A., & Prieger, J. E. (2015). Evaluating the impact of the American recovery and reinvestment act’s BTOP on broadband adoption. Applied Economics, 47(60), 6553–6579. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1080810
  • Hirst, D. (2015, October 7). Fixed broadband: Policy and speeds. House of Commons Library, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2007). Public-private partnerships: An international performance review. Public Administration Review, 67(3), 545–558. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x
  • Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2016). On public–Private partnership performance: A contemporary review. Public Works Management & Policy, 22(1), 55–78. doi:10.1177/1087724X16657830
  • House of Commons. (2016, July 13). Establishing world class connectivity throughout the UK. Retrieved from publictaions.parliament.uk
  • Howell, B., & Sadowski, B. (2018). Anatomy of a public-private partnership: Hold-up and regulatory commitment in ultrafast broadband. Telecommunications Policy, 42(7), 552–565. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2018.05.001
  • Hutton, G. (2017, December). A universal service obligation (USO) for broadband. House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP 8146, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • Hutton, G. (2018, November 13). Full-fibre networks in the UK. House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP 8392, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • ITU. (2012). Developing successful public-private partnerships to foster investment in universal broadband. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  • Jackson, M. (2015, August 20). INCA demands share of GBP129m clawback for alternative broadband ISPs, ISP Review, Retrieved from www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2016a, March 10). Update – Government claims 90 percent UK superfast broadband cover. ISP Review, Retrieved from www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2016b, June 24). Oxfordshire - £4.2m savings form BDUK and BT fibre broadband rollout. ISP Review, Retrieved from www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2017a, June 30). Gigaclear and BT wins Essex’s phase 3 ‘Superfast Broadband’ rollout contract. ISP Review, Retrieved from http//:www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2017b, July 18). Leicestershire approve £5.63m project to extend superfast broadband cover. ISP Review, Retrieved from http//:www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2017c, July 30). Update – BT and Gov propose £600m 10Mbps broadband USO universal service, ISP Review, Retrieved from http//:www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2018a, January 29). Government hails 95% UK coverage of 24Mbps superfast broadband. ISP Review, Retrieved from http//:www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jackson, M. (2018b, February 2). BT ultrafast broadband covers 886K UK premises as pay TV shrinks. ISP Review, Retrieved from www.ispreview.co.uk
  • Jones, G., & Stewart, J. (2009). New development: Accountability in public partnerships – The case of local strategic partnerships. Public Money & Management, 29(1), 59–64. doi:10.1080/09540960802617376
  • Lattemann, C., Stieglitz, S., Kupke, S., & Schneider, A.-M. (2009). Impact of PPPs to broadband diffusion in Europe. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3(4), 355. doi:10.1108/17506160910997874
  • Le Grand, J. (1991). The theory of government failure. British Journal of Political Science, 21(4), 423–442. doi:10.1017/S0007123400006244
  • Loube, R. (2016). Broadband policy: Industry planning and the public interest. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(2), 510–518. doi:10.1080/00213624.2016.1179058
  • Marsh, D., & McConnell, A. (2010). Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2), 564–583. doi:10.1111/padm.2010.88.issue-2
  • Martinez Coral, P. (2014). Fallas del mercado de Internet banda ancha: Lecciones para el diseño de política pública. Contexto, 43, 95–113.
  • Mölleryd, B. G. (2015). Development of high-speed networks and the role of municipal networks. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No 26, Retrieved from www.oecd.org
  • NAO. (2013, July 5). The rural broadband programme. Retrieved from www.nao.org.uk
  • NAO. (2015, January). The superfast (rural) broadband programme: Update. Retrieved from www.nao.org.uk
  • Nucciarelli, A., Sadowski, B., & Achard, P. (2010). Emerging models of public–Private interplay for European broadband access: Evidence from the Netherlands and Italy. Telecommunications Policy, 34(9), 513–527. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2010.07.004
  • OECD. (2008). Public-private partnerships: In pursuit of risk sharing and value for money. Paris, France: Author.
  • Ofcom. (2017, December 15). Connected Nations 2017. London, UK: Author.
  • Ofcom. (2018, July 24). Regulatory certainty to support investment in full-fibre broadband. London, UK: Author.
  • Osborne, S. P. (2000). Public-private partnerships : Theory and practice in international perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Picot, A., & Wernick, C. (2007). The role of government in broadband access. Telecommunications Policy, 31(10–11), 660–674. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2007.08.002
  • Po-An Hsieh, J. J., Keil, M., Holmström, J., & Kvasny, L. (2012). The bumpy road to universal access: An actor-network analysis of a U.S. municipal broadband Internet initiative. The Information Society, 28(4), 264–283. doi:10.1080/01972243.2012.689271
  • Pratt, A., & Rathbone, D. (2016, July 4). Broadband in Wales. House of Commons Library, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • Priestly, S., & Baker, C. (2017, March9). Superfast broadband coverage in the UK. House of Commons Library, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • Public Accounts Committee. (2014). Public accounts committee – fifitieth report. The rural broadband programme. London, UK: House of Commons.
  • Qiang, C. Z-W., Rossotto, C. M., & Kimura, K. (2009). Economic impacts of broadband. In World bank information and communications for development 2009. Washington DC, USA: The World Bank.
  • Rathbone, D. (2016, July 4). Superfast broadband coverage in the UK. House of Commons Library, Retrieved from www.parliament.uk
  • Sadowski, B., Howell, B., & Nucciarelli, A. (2013). Structural separation and the role of public-private partnerships in New Zealand’s UFB initiative. Communications & Strategies, 91(3), 57–80.
  • Stocker, V., & Whalley, J. (2018). Speed isn’t everything: A multicriteria analysis of broadband consumer experience in the UK. Telecommunications Policy, 42(1), 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.06.001
  • Thinkbroadband. (2017). UK superfast and fibre coverage, Retrieved from labs.thinkbroadband.com
  • Valle de Souza, S., Dollery, B., & Kortt, M. A. (2018). Counting the cost: A critical evaluation of the Australian national broadband network roll-out under the Rudd/Gillard Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(2), 129–136. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1255960
  • Van der Wee, M., & Beltran, F. (2015, November 9 – 10). The efficiency and effectiveness of a mixed public-private broadband deployment. The case of New Zealand’s ultra fast broadband deployment. In Conference of telecommunication, media and internet techno-economics. Munich, Germany.
  • Yoo, C. S., & Pfenninger, T. (2017). Municipal fiber in the United States: An empirical assessment of financial performance. Retrieved from http//:www.law.upenn.edu

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.