Why Civil Society Cannot Battle it All Alone: The Roles of Civil Society Environment, Transparent Laws and Quality of Public Administration in Political Corruption Mitigation

References

• Abers, R. (1998). From clientelism to cooperation: Local government, participatory policy, and civic organizing in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Politics and Society, 26(4), 511–537. doi:10.1177/0032329298026004004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbouAssi, K. (2012). Hands in the pockets of mercurial donors: NGO respose to shifting funding priorities. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 584–602. doi:10.1177/0899764012439629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbouAssi, K. (2014). Get money get involved? NGO’s reactions to donor funding and their potential involvement in the public policy processes. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25, 968–990. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9389-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alt, J., & Lassen, D. (2003). The political economy of institutions and corruption in American states. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15(3), 341–365. doi:10.1177/0951692803015003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amundsen, I. (1999). Political corruption: An introduction to the issues. Working Paper, Chr. Michelsen Institute, Development Studies and Human Rights, Bergen, Norway: Chr. Michelsen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Anechiarico, F. (1998). Administrative culture and civil society – A comparative perspective. Administration & Society, 30, 13–34. doi:10.1177/009539979803000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccaro, L., & Papadakis, K. (2009). The downside of participatory-deliberative public administration. Socio-economic Review, 7, 245–276. doi:10.1093/ser/mwn030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G., Heller, P., & Silva, M. K. (2008). Making space for civil society: Institutional reforms and local democracy in Brazil. Social Forces, 86(3), 911–936. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batalla, E. (2015). Treading the straight and righteous path: Curbing corruption in the Philippines. Asian Education and Development Studies, 4(1), 51–75. doi:10.1108/AEDS-10-2014-0043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batory, A. (2012). Why do anti-corruption laws fail in Central Eastern Europe? A target compliance perspective. Regulation and Governance, 6(1), 66–82. doi:10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhard, M., Tzelgov, E., Jung, D.-J., Coppedge, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2015), ‘The varieties of democracy core civil society index (V-Dem Working Paper Series 2015 (13)). Retrieved from: https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/24/28/24280356-9e0f-4e2b-a339-f5b7f27f645b/v-dem_working_paper_2015_13_edited.pdf; https://ssrn.com/abstract=2667493
   Google Scholar
• Birner, R., & Wittmer, H. (2006). Better public sector governance through partnership with the private sector and civil society: The case of Guatemala’s forest administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(4), 459–472. doi:10.1177/0020852306070077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, D. (2007). Foreword. In S. Bracking (Ed.), Corruption and development: The anti-corruption campaigns. (pp. ix–xi). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Buyse, A. (2018). Squeezing civic space: Restrictions on civil society organizations and the linkages with human rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 1–23. doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1492916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camaj, L. (2013). The media’s role in fighting corruption: Media effects on governmental accountability. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(1), 21–42. doi:10.1177/1940161212462741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, E., & Chu, Y. (2006). Corruption and trust: Exceptionalism in Asian democracies? The Journal of Politics, 68(2), 259–271. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00404.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, M. (2002). Explaining corruption: An institutional approach. Crime, Law and Social Change, 38(1), 1–32. doi:10.1023/A:1019802614530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppedge, M., Gerring, J., Knutsen, C. H., Lind- Berg, S. I., Skaaning, S.-E., Teorell, J., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). “V-Dem Codebook v8” Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. doi:10.23696/vdemcy18.
   Google Scholar
• Desta, Y. (2006). Designing anti-corruption strategies for developing countries: A country study of Eritrea. Journal of Developing Societies, 22(4), 421–449. doi:10.1177/0169796X06072568
   Google Scholar
• Donaghy, M. (2011). Do participatory Governance Institutions matter? Municipal councils and social housing programs in Brazil. Comparative Politics, 44(1), 83–102. doi:10.5129/001041510X13815229366606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2018). Government co-option of civil society: Exploring the AKP’s role within Turkish women’s CSOs. Democratization, 25(3), 445–463. doi:10.1080/13510347.2017.1373096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., Molders, F., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2007). Are NGOs the better donors? A case study of aid allocation for Sweden. Working Paper, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, K., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Who survived Ethiopia’s regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419–456. doi:10.1080/09692290.2014.903854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00014-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egerer, M., Kankainen, V., & Hellman, M. (2018). Compromising the public good? Civil society as beneficiary of gambling revenue. Journal of Civil Society, 14(3), 207–221. doi:10.1080/17448689.2018.1496306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritzen, S. (2005). Beyond “Political Will”: How institutional context shapes the implementation of anti-corruption policies. Policy and Society, 24(3), 79–96. doi:10.1016/S1449-4035(05)70061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gans-Morse, J., Borges, M., Makarin, A., Mannah-Blankson, T., Nickow, A., & Zhang, D. (2018). Reducing bureaucratic corruption: Interdisciplinary perspectives on what works. World Development, 105, 171–188. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 295–330. doi:10.1017/S0007123404000067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibelman, M., & Gelman, S. (2004). A loss of credibility: Patterns of wrongdoing among nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 15(4), 355–381. doi:10.1007/s11266-004-1237-7
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L., & Mohseni, P. (2018). Disabling dissent: The colour revolutions, autocratic linkages, and civil society regulations in hybrid regimes. Contemporary Politics, 24(4), 454–480. doi:10.1080/13569775.2018.1471645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenlee, J., Fischer, M., Gordon, T., & Keating, E. (2007). An investigation of fraud in nonprofit organizations: Occurences and deterrents. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4), 676–694. doi:10.1177/0899764007300407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, M. (2013). The contingencies of societal accountability: Examining the link between civil society and good government. Studies in Comparative International Development, 48(4), 380–402. doi:10.1007/s12116-012-9126-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindess, B. (2013). Good government and corruption. In P. Larmour & N. Wolanin (Eds.), Corruption and anti-corruption (pp. 1–10). Canberra: Australian National University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt2tt19f.4%0AJSTOR
   Google Scholar
• Ishkanian, A. (2014). Engineered civil society: The impact of 20 years of democracy promotion on civil society development in the former Soviet countries. In T. Beichelt, I. Hahn, F. Schimmelfennig, & S. Worshech (Eds.), Civil society and democracy promotion (pp. 150–170). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jepson, P. (2005). Governance and accountability of environmental NGOs. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(5), 515–524. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2005.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kray, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2003). ‘Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996, 1998, 2000, and 2002ʹ. World Bank Economic Review, 18(2), 253–287. doi:10.1093/wber/lhh041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunicova, J., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2005). Electoral rules and constitutional structures as constraints on corruption. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 573–606. doi:10.1017/S0007123405000311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, G. (2005). Textbook count and civil society participation: Effecting system reforms in the Department of Education (pp. 1–14). Makati City, Philippines: Government Watch Ateneo School of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. (2010). Disciplined activists, unruly brokers: Exploring the boundaries between non-governmental organizations (NGOs), donors, and the state in Bangladesh. In D. Gellner (Ed.), Varieties of activist experience: Civil society in South Asia. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, C., & Naurin, D. (2010). Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption. International Political Science Review, 31(4), 301–322. doi:10.1177/0192512110377602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, H. (2004). Fellesskapets fundament: Sivilsamfunnet og individualismen. Oslo: Pax.
   Google Scholar
• Manzetti, L., & Wilson, C. (2007). Why do corrupt governments maintain public support? Comparative Political Studies, 40(8), 949–970. doi:10.1177/0010414005285759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova, D. (2011). When government fails us: Trust in post-socialist civil organizations. Democratization, 18(1), 160–183. doi:10.1080/13510347.2011.532623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMann, K., Pemstein, D., Teorell, J., & Seim, B. (2015) Complementary strategies of validation. 2015: Assessing the validity of V-Dem corruption index and indicators (Working Paper Series, 2015 (23)). Varieties of Democracy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Minogue, M. (2002). Power to the People? Good governance and the reshaping of the state. In U. Kothari & M. Minogue (Eds.), Development theory and practice (pp. 117–135). London, UK: Palgrave – now Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morlino, L. (2011). Changes for democracy: Actors, structures, processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mosley, J. (2012). Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 841–866. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2006). Corruption: Diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Democracy, 17(3), 86–99. doi:10.1353/jod.2006.0050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2010). The experience of civil society as an anticorruption actor in East Central Europe. Romanian Journal of Political Science, 10(SPEC. ISSUE), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Mungiu-Pippidi, A., & Dusu, A. E. (2011). Civil society and control of corruption: Assessing governance of Romanian public universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(5), 526–540. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dwyer, B., & Boomsma, R. (2015). The co-construction of NGO accountability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28(1), 36–68. doi:10.1108/AAAJ-10-2013-1488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, S. (2017). Grassroots accountability promises in rights-based approaches to development: The role of transformative monitoring and evaluation in NGOs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 63, 21–41. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2003)
   Google Scholar
• Parks, T. (2008). The rise and fall of donor funding for advocacy NGOs: Understanding the impact. Development in Practice, 18(2), 213–222. doi:10.1080/09614520801899036
   Google Scholar
• Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K. L., & Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y.-t., Krusell, J. & Miri, F. (2018). The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert- coded data (V-Dem Working Paper Series 2018 (21)). Retrieved from: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2704787.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2001). The politics of bureaucracy (5th ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid, A. K. (2014). The role of the bureaucracy in policymaking in Bangladesh. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36(2), 150–161. doi:10.1080/23276665.2014.911491
   Google Scholar
• Rios-Figueroa, J. (2012). Justice system institutions and corruption control: Evidence form Latin America. The Justice System Journal, 33(2), 195–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and Government: Causes consequences and reform. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rose-Ackerman, S. (2008). Corruption. In Readings in Public Choice and Constitutional Political Economy (pp. 551–566). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Saglie, J., & Sivesind, K. (2018). Civil society institutions or semi-public agencies? State regulation of parties and voluntary organizations in Norway. Journal of Civil Society, 1–19. doi:10.1080/17448689.2018.1518769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrama, R., & Zhelyazkova, A. (2018). “You can’t have one without the other”: The differential impact of civil society strength on the implementation of EU policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 1029–1048. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1433709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serageldin, I. (1996). Sustainability as opportunity and the problem of social capital. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 3(2), 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Setiyono, B., & McLeod, R. H. (2010). Civil society organisations’ contribution to the anti-corruption movement in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 46(3), 347–370. doi:10.1080/00074918.2010.522504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 599–617. doi:10.2307/2118402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, A. (2016). Configurations of corruption: A cross-national qualitative comparative analysis of levels of perceived corruption. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57(4), 183–206. doi:10.1177/0020715216665663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, H.-E. (2002). A convergence approach to the analysis of political corruption: A cross-national study. Crime, Law and Social Change, 38(20), 137–160. doi:10.1023/A:1020239413622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Themudo, N. S. (2013). Reassessing the impact of civil society: Nonprofit sector, press freedom, and corruption. Governance, 26(1), 63–89. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01602.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, J. G., & Townsend, A. R. (2004). Accountability, motivation and practice: NGOs North and South. Social and Cultural Geography, 5(2), 271–284. doi:10.1080/14649360410001690259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tusalem, R. (2007). A boon or a bane? The role of civil society in third- and fourth-wave democracies. International Political Science Review, 28(3), 361–386. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20445098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlin, A. (2009). Which characteristics of civil society organizations support what aspects of democracy? Evidence from post-communist Latvia. International Political Science Review, 30(3), 271–295. doi:10.1177/0192512109105639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlin, A. (2010). The structure and culture of post-communist civil society in Latvia. Europe–Asia Studies, 62(5), 829–852. doi:10.1080/09668136.2010.481388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2008)
   Google Scholar
• van Biezen, I. (2004). Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics, 10(6), 701–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B., & Avritzer, L. (2004). Participatory publics civil society and new institutions in democratic Brazil. Comparative Politics, 36(3), 291–312. doi:10.2307/4150132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widojoko, J. D. (2017). Indonesia’s anticorruption campaign: Civil society versus the political cartel. In M. dela Rama & C. Rowley (Eds),The changing face of corruption in the Asia Pacific (pp. 253–266). Elsevier BV. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-101109-6.00017-4
   Google Scholar
• Wiktorowicz, Q. (2000). Civil society as social control: State power in Jordan. Comparative Politics, 33(1), 43–61. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/422423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. (2009). Institutional congruence, ideas and anticorruption policy: The case of the United States. Public Administration Review, 69, S142–S150. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40469085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan, J. (2012). Filling the gap of formal institutions: The effects of Guanxi network in corruption in reform-era China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 93–109. doi:10.1007/s10611-012-9379-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar