334
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Is Citizens’ Trust Escalating the Effect of Sound Governance on Citizens’ Satisfaction in Ethiopia?

&

References

  • Akinloye Akinboade, O., Chanceline Kinfack, E., & Putuma Mokwena, M. (2012). An analysis of citizen satisfaction with public service delivery in the sedibeng district municipality of South Africa. International Journal of Social Economics, 39, 182–199. doi:10.1108/03068291211199350
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
  • Awang, Z. (2012). A handbook on structural equation modelling using AMOS. Shah Alam, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi MARA press.
  • Baker, W. H., Lon Addams, H., & Davis, B. (2005). Critical factors for enhancing municipal public hearings. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 490–499.
  • Beeri, I., Uster, A., & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2019). Does performance management relate to good governance? a study of its relationship with citizens’ satisfaction with and trust in Israeli local government. Public Performance & Management Review, 42(2), 241–279. doi:10.1080/15309576.2018.1436074
  • Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
  • Bentler, P., & Bonett, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  • Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the bulletin. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 400–404. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
  • Berner, M. (2001). Citizen participation in local government budgeting. Popular Government, 66(3), 23–30.
  • Beshi, T. D., & Kaur, R. (2019). Public trust in local government: Explaining the role of good governance practices. Public Organization Review, 1–14. doi:10.1007/s11115-019-00444-6
  • Blind, P. K. (2007, June). Building trust in government in the twenty-first century: Review of literature and emerging issues. 7th global forum on reinventing government building trust in government. Vienna, Austria: United Nations Head Quarter.
  • Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2001, September). Government performance and trust in government. Paper for the permanent study group of productivity and quality in the public sector at the European group of public administration annual conference, Vaasa, Finland.
  • Bouckaert, G., & Van de Walle, S. (2003). Comparing measures of citizen trust and user satisfaction as indicators of ‘good governance’: Difficulties in linking trust and satisfaction indicators. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(3), 329–344.
  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Caemmerer, B., Brock, C., Evanschitzky, H., & Alexander, M. (2017). Public service satisfaction, citizen trust, and participation: An abstract. In P. Rossi (Ed.), Marketing at the confluence between entertainment and analytics (pp. 513–514). Cham, Switzerland: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_96
  • Chin, W. W., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: A note of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237–246. doi:10.2307/249690
  • Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2005). Trust in government: The relative importance of service satisfaction, political factors and demography. Public Performance and Management Review, 28(4), 487–511.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Denhardt, R. B. (2002). Trust as capacity: The role of integrity and responsiveness. Public Organization Review, 2(1), 65–76. doi:10.1023/A:1016027504549
  • Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley.
  • Farazmand, A. (2004a). Sound governance in the age of globalization. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations (pp. 1–23). Westport: Praeger.
  • Farazmand, A. (2004b). Building partnerships for sound governance. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations (pp. 77–98). Westport: Praeger.
  • Farazmand, A. (2012). Sound governance: Engaging citizens through collaborative organizations. Public Organization Review, 12(3), 223–241. doi:10.1007/s11115-012-0186-7
  • Farazmand, A. (2017). Governance reforms: The good, the bad, and the ugly; and the sound: Examining the past and exploring the future of public organizations. Public Organization Review, 17(4), 595–617. doi:10.1007/s11115-017-0398-y
  • Firdaus. (2016). Sound governance in case of mamminasata metropolitan development area in South Sulawesi Province. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 20(1), 1–22.
  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
  • Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science, 28(6), 725–737. doi:10.1016/S0305-0483(00)00021-9
  • Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for likert-type scales. Midwest research-to-practice conference in adult, continuing, and community education. Columbus, OH.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis with readings (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Rabin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hardt, M., & Negri, N. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Holidin, D., & Handini, R. S. (2014). Sound governance analysis in the innovation of traditional market revitalization and street vendors management. International Journal of Administrative Science and Organization, 21(1), 17–26.
  • Holmes-Smith, P., Coote, L., & Cunningham, E. (2006). Structural equation modeling: From the fundamental to advanced topics. Melbourne, Australia: Streams.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modelling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Johnston, W., Krahn, H., & Harrison, T. (2006). Democracy, political institutions, and trust: The limits of current electoral reform proposals. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31(2), 165–182.
  • Kampen, J. K., Van De Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2006). Assessing the relation between satisfaction with public service delivery and trust in government: The impact of the predisposition of citizens toward government on evaluations of its performance. Public Performance and Management Review, 29(4), 387–404.
  • Kim, D., Ferrin, D., & Rao, H. R. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 237–257. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0188
  • Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819–828. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02593.x
  • Kim, S., Lee, J., & Lee, J. (2018). Citizen participation and public trust in local government: The Republic of Korea case. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 18(2), 73–92. doi:10.1787/budget-18-5j8fz1kqp8d8
  • Knack, S., & Zak, P. J. (2003). Building trust: Public policy, interpersonal trust, and economic development. Supreme Court Economic Review, 10, 91–107. doi:10.1086/scer.10.1147139
  • Kweit, M. G., & Kweit, R. W. (2007). Participation, perception of participation, and citizen support. American Politics Research, 35(3), 407–425. doi:10.1177/1532673X06296206
  • Ma, L. (2017). Performance management and citizen satisfaction with the government: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Public Administration, 95(1), 39–59. doi:10.1111/padm.12275
  • Miller, A. H., & Listhoug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20, 357–386. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005883
  • Netemeyer, R. G., Johnston, M. W., & Burton, S. (1990). Analysis of role conflict and role ambiguity in a structural equations framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 148–157. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.148
  • Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Nye, J., Zelikow, P. D., & King, D. C. (Eds.). (1997). Why people don’t trust government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • OECD. (2013). Trust in government, policy effectiveness and the governance agenda. In Government at a glance (pp. 19–37). Paris: Author. doi:10.1787/gov_glance-2013-6-en
  • Park, H., & Blenkinsopp, J. (2011). The roles of transparency and trust in the relationship between corruption and citizen satisfaction. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(2), 254–274. doi:10.1177/0020852311399230
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
  • Rawlins, B. L. (2008). Measuring the relationship between organizational transparency and employee trust. Public Relations Journal, 2(2), 1–21.
  • Selnes, F. (1998). Antecedents and consequences of trust and satisfaction in buyer‐seller relationships. European Journal of Marketing, 32(3/4), 305–322. doi:10.1108/03090569810204580
  • Setyadihraja, R., Kurniasih, D., Nursnaeny, P. S., & Nengsih, N. S. (2017). Good governance vs. sound governance: A comparative theoretical analysis. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), volume 163. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Democracy, Accountability and Governance (ICODAG 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis press.
  • Sternstein, A. (2010). Study links online transparency efforts, trust in government. Retrieved from https://www.nextgov.com/cio-briefing/2010/02/study-links-online-transparency-efforts-trust-in-government/45965/.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning, and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70(4), 547–593. doi:10.3102/00346543070004547
  • UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). (1998, March). Governance in Africa: Consolidating the international foundations. Report of the joint ECA/DESA conference on governance in Africa. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8/9), 891–913. doi:10.1081/PAD-120019352
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23, 433–448. doi:10.1002/pam.20020
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2006). Testing the expectancy disconfirmation model of citizen satisfaction with local government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599–611. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui058
  • Van Ryzin, G. G. (2007). Pieces of a puzzle: Linking government performance, citizen satisfaction, and trust. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 521–535.
  • Vigoda, E., & Yuval, F. (2003). Managerial quality, administrative performance and trust in governance: Can we point to causality? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 62(3), 12–25. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8500.2003.00333.x
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2007). Citizens’ perceptions of politics and ethics in public administration: A five-year national study of their relationship to satisfaction with services, trust in governance, and voice orientations. Journal of Public Administration and Research and Theory, 17(2), 285–305. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj018
  • Wang, X. (2001). Assessing public participation in U.S. cities. Public Performance and Management Review, 24(4), 322–336.
  • Wang, Z. (2010). Citizens’ satisfactions with government performance in six Asia-Pacific giants. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 11(1), 51–75. doi:10.1017/S1468109909990132
  • Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Hindi, N., & Osman, I. (2016). Are U.K. citizens satisfied with E-Government services? Identifying and testing antecedents of satisfaction. Information Systems Management, 33(4), 331–343. doi:10.1080/10580530.2016.1220216
  • Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government and trust in government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391. doi:10.1093/jopart/mui021
  • Wu, W.-N., & Jung, K. (2016). A missing link between citizen participation, satisfaction, and public performance: Evidences from the city and county of San Francisco. International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 2(4), 392–410. doi:10.1504/IJPSPM.2016.079720
  • Yang, Y. (2018). Is transparency a double-edged sword in citizen satisfaction with public service? Evidence from China’s public healthcare. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 28(4), 484–506. doi:10.1108/JSTP-06-2017-0102
  • Zikmund, W. G. (1994). Business research methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Dryden Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.