Analysis of the Technical Efficiency of the Programme of Modernisation of the Land Tenure Services in a Developing Country

References

• Afonso, A., & Aubyn, M. S. (2005). Non-parametric approaches to education and health efficiency in OECD countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 8(2), 227–246. doi:10.1080/15140326.2005.12040626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amar, A., & Berthier, L. (2007). Le nouveau management public: Avantages et limites. Gestion Et Management Publics, 5, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264. doi:10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., & Entwistle, T. (2010). Does cross-sectoral partnership deliver? An empirical exploration of public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 679–701. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augustinus, C., Lemmen, C., & van Oosterom, P. (2006). Social tenure domain model: Requirements from the perspective of pro-poor land management. Proceeding of the 5th FIG Regional Conference, Accra, Ghana, International Federation of Surveyors.
   Google Scholar
• Bandeira, P., Sumpsi, J. M., & Falconi, C. (2010). Evaluating land administration systems: A comparative method with an application to peru and honduras. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 351–363. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, G. (2003). Lessons learned: An evaluation of land administration initiatives in Latin America over the past two decades. Land Use Policy, 20, 367–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2008). Organising land information for sustainable land administration. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 126–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilodeau, N., Laurin, C., & Vining, A. (2006). “Choice of organizational form makes a real difference”: The impact of corporatization on government agencies in Canada. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 119–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogetoft, P., & Otto, L. (2010). Benchmarking with Dea, Sfa, and R (Vol. 157). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Borzacchiello, M. T., & Craglia, M. (2012). The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: A research strategy. International Journal of Technology Management, 60(1–2), 114–129. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2012.049109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouckaert, G. (1993). Measurement and meaningful management. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17, 31–43. doi:10.2307/3381047
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, S., Johnson, G., & Millington, J. (2001). The effect of competition on the efficiency of secodary schools in English. European Journal of Operational Research, 135, 545–568. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00328-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, A., & Dalrymple, K. (2007). Land administration core comparisons. In FIG working week 2007 (pp. 1–16). Hong Kong SAR: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, T., Grant, C., Nettle, K., Brits, A. M., & Dalrymple, K. (2007). Land administration reform: Indicators of success and future challenges. Agriculture and Rural Development Discussion Paper, 37, 1–227.
   Google Scholar
• Centre for Affordable Housing Finnance in Africa. (2018). Year book. CAHF.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Neralić, L. (1990). Sensitivity analysis of the additive model in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(3), 332–341. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90416-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale, P. F., & McLaughlin, J. D. (1999). Land Administration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 19, 273–292. doi:10.2307/1906814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deininger, K., Selod, H., & Burns, A. (2011). The land governance assessment framework: Identifying and monitoring good practice in the land sector. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Deininger, K. W. (2003). Land policies for growth and poverty reduction. World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsch, J. J., & Yasin, M. M. (1998). A framework for benchmarking in the public sector: Literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11(2/3), 91–115. doi:10.1108/09513559810216410
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, P. J., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money and Management, 14(3), 9–16. doi:10.1080/09540969409387823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark, S. (2001). Land administration infrastructures for sustainable development. Property Management, 19(5), 366–383. doi:10.1108/02637470110410194
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (general), 120(3), 253–281. doi:10.2307/2343100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayol, H. (1918). Administration industrielle et générale (Vol. 2). Dunod et Pinat.
   Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management in action. USA: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galiani, S., & Schargrodsky, E. (2010). Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling. Journal of Public Economics, 94(9–10), 700–729. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1989). An application procedure for DEA. Omega, 17(3), 237–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosskopf, S., & Valdmanis, V. (1987). Measuring hospital performance: A non-parametric approach. Journal of Health Economics, 6(2), 89–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure: Experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 433–467. doi:10.1016/S0161-8938(00)00036-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyimah-Brempong, K., & Elizabeth, N. A. (2004). Technical efficiency in Ghanaian secondary education. Conference on Ghana’s economy, Accra.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingsworth, B. (2003). Non-parametric and parametric applications measuring efficiency in health care. Health Care Management Science, 6(4), 203–218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19. doi:10.1111/padm.1991.69.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1995). Contemporary public management: A new global paradigm? Public Policy and Administration, 10(2), 104–117.
   Google Scholar
• Institut national de la Statistique. (2018). Rapport statistique annuel. INS.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, P. H., & Stonecash, R. E. (2005). Incentives and the efficiency of public sector‐outsourcing contracts. Journal of Economic Surveys, 19(5), 767–787. doi:10.1111/joes.2005.19.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, A. L., & McGinnis, L. F. (2008). Outlier detection in two-stage semiparametric DEA models. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(2), 629–635. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., & Sambo, L. G. (2002). Measurement of technical efficiency of public hospitals in Kenya: Using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Medical Systems, 26(1), 39–45.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. In: Activity analysis of production and allocation (pp. 33–97). London: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (2003). Stochastic Frontier analysis. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., Van Oosterom, P., & Bennett, R. (2015). The land administration domain model. Land Use Policy, 49, 535–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luenberger, D. G. (1992). New optimality principles for economic efficiency and equilibrium. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 75(2), 221–264. doi:10.1007/BF00941466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millimet, D. L., & Collier, T. (2008). Efficiency in public schools: Does competition matter? Journal of Econometrics, 145(1–2), 134–157. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MINDCAF. (2017). Rapport d’activité annuel. Ministère des domaines du Cadastre et des affaires Foncière.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère du domaine du Cadastre et des affaires Foncières. (2018). Rapport d’activité annuel. MINDAF.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Domaine and Land Tenure. (2018). Annual report. MINDLT.
   Google Scholar
• Molen, V. P. (2002). The dynamic aspect of land administration: An often-forgotten component in system design. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(5), 361–381. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(02)00009-1
   Google Scholar
• Morris, M. H., & Sexton, D. L. (1996). The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: Implications for company performance. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 5–13. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(95)00158-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367. doi:10.1177/0951692890002004001
   Google Scholar
• Oï, W. Y. (1992). Productivity in the distributive trades: The shopper and the economies of massed reserves. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), Output measurement in the service sectors (pp. 161–193). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, O., Guthrie, J., & Humphrey, C. (1998). Global warning! Debating international developments in new public financial management. Oslo, USA: Cappelen Akademisk Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1993). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Plume.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osei, D., d'Almeida, S., George, M. O., Kirigia, J. M., Mensah, A. O., & Kainyu, L. H. (2005). Technical efficiency of public district hospitals and health centres in Ghana: A pilot study. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 3(1), 9.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform. A comparative analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabifard, A., Williamson, I. P., Steudler, D., Binns, A., & King, M. (2006). Assessing the worldwide comparison of cadastral systems. Land Use Policy, 24(1), 275–288. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, H. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 400–410. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00160-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sergei, S., Burdyco, O., & Miroslave, K. (2017). Land administration quality assessment: LGAF, Doing bussiness, WPLA UNECE. What next? In from digitalisation to augmented reality. FIG. Retrieved From https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_Pproceedings/fig2017/papers/ts01a/TS01A_shavrov_burdyko_et_al_8663.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shephard, G. C. (1953). Unitary groups generated by reflections. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 5, 364–383. doi:10.4153/CJM-1953-042-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83(3), 573–596. doi:10.1111/padm.2005.83.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, P. C., & Street, A. (2005). Measuring the efficiency of public services: The limits of analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (statistics in Society), 168(2), 401–417. doi:10.1111/rssa.2005.168.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steudler, D. (2004). A framework for the evaluation of land administration systems (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Thellufsen, C., Rajabifard, A., Enemark, S., & Williamson, I. (2009). Awareness as a foundation for developing effective spatial data infrastructures. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 254–261. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P., & Davidson, J. O. (1995). The continuity and discontinuity: Managerial rhetoric in turbulent times. Personnel Review, 24(4), 17–33. doi:10.1108/00483489510147286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyteca, D. (1996). On the measurement of the environmental performance of firms—A literature review and a productive efficiency perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 46(3), 281–308. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (1996). Land administration guidelines with special reference to countries in transition. New York and Geneva: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1922). Bureaucracy. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics of public administration (4th ed., pp. 37–44). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace College Publishers, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy  and  society (2 vols.). Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, cited in DuGay (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I. (2001). Re-engineering land administration systems for sustainable development - from rhetoric to reality increasingly. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation, 3(3), pp.278–289.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development (p. 487). Redlands, CA: ESRI Press Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, I., & Ting, L. L. (2001). Land administration and cadastral trends - a framework for re-engineering. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 25(4–5), 339–366. doi:10.1016/S0198-9715(00)00053-3
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies (p. 2630). New York, NY and Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. W. (1993). Detecting outliers in deterministic nonparametric frontier models with multiple outputs. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 11(3), 319–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, W. (1887). The Study of Administration. Political Science Quarterly, 2, 197–22. doi:10.2307/2139277
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (1996). Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(3), 451–460. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(95)00054-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar